Legend of Zelda Golden Goddesses 2-C downgrade

[GiverOfThePeace]

...So you're telling me that Hyrule is being referred to as the entire universe in these stories, instead of the whole planet which would make much more sense?
So you're trying to say that the Golden Goddesses also flew into Lorule and did the exact same thing, except with an upside down Triforce this time? I'm pretty sure that the upside down Triforce is supposed to imply that different people made it, there is no indication that they made every Triforce either.

It literally said before time began and that it was in chaos which in creation myth stories refers exactly to the definition I sent you, it doesn't make more sense at all.

It doesn't at all imply that.

 

[Super_Ascended_Sean_Pazdera]

It said before time began as though it was unrelated. Time starting after that point had not been mentioned. In fact both of the manuals imply that time had already started at that point and both of them refer to the Earth. It also said that only Hyrule (the Earth) had chaos.

Why would the Triforce not be upside right if it was made by the same people? There's even less proof to indicate that our Golden Goddesses went into an alternate dimension, created the Triforce, and dipped just like they did with us.

 

[LSirLancelotDuLacl]

Upside right? Uh.. Am sorry, what?

 

[Super_Ascended_Sean_Pazdera]

You've never heard that term? Upside down, upside right?

 

[Inverted_Tempest]

Why would that remotely be the case? Also, the creation myth gives similar vibes to what Pokemon has with its creation myth. Pokemon similarly emphasizes Arceus creating a universe over and over again when its in fact responsible for more than just that. Giver already explained what chaos meant, it was clearly a primordial chaos. You can even see in the Ocarina of Time cutscene that the planet was not around beforehand and the idea of "even before time began" would literally back that up.

Also, it's pretty much backed that the Golden Goddesses probably created the Realm of the Ocean King and Termina as well. There is imagery of them in each of those respective worlds to clarify they likely share that same creator status. You would need to substantiate to begin with that they just went and did that multiple times. Again, this is legit just Arceus vibes again. They both descend upon chaos, create a bunch of universes, then return to their higher existence because they already did their job.

 

[LSirLancelotDuLacl]

Never heard of it.

 

[Super_Ascended_Sean_Pazdera]

No, it doesn't. You're trying to force it to be similar to Arceus's creation myth. Why was Hyrule mentioned in the legend pre-time if it wasn't shown? In fact it WAS shown the moment they started working on it.

Also, the Waters of the Ocean King, even if they WERE not created by the Ocean King himself, is a pocket dimension, unlike Lorule which is a parallel universe and in fact does not have those symbols.

 

[Super_Ascended_Sean_Pazdera]

Never heard of it.

Oh, I meant right side up.

 

[Inverted_Tempest]

How am I remotely trying to "force" the connection? I gave reasons because there are similar parallels, which you've not decided to address other than calling it just wrong. Hyrule being mentioned pre-time is referring to its state before it had been fully formed by the Goddesses, which was in a primordial chaos, just as Giver already explained to you repeatedly. And no, it was shown that there was a nothingness, in which it starts showing the main creation of the planet as the example with the land developed.

The Ocean King didn't create the Realm of the Ocean King, he's just a deity classified as its protector. Also, when did we agree on that just being a pocket dimension? Do you have anything to prove that? Lorule and Termina should similarly fall under the creation at the minimum from the fact mentions of the Goddesses are in both realms.

 

[AKM sama]

Brane Cosmology, multiple chronal dimensions, etc etc.

Such an interpretation requires evidence in the work itself, however.

What kind of evidence are we talking about here?

 

[Kepekley23]

What kind of evidence are we talking about here?

Outright statements in the work itself, or at least suggestions of a similar cosmology.