- 10,116
- 11,488
You just made it 112
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You just made it 112
I'm aware given that's what you've been doing for the most part.Yes it absolutely can, literally anyone can just say "but this feat can be any other tier" without any basis whatsoever.
This is hardly any different since you're just throwing "it could be a Tier 1 artifact and this could have still played out the same way."
It could be literally any other tier but that's not what I'm arguing right now, I'm arguing about whether or not 3-A is even legit in the first place.
Nah, literally not what I said, unless you only read half the paragraph anyway...Except your point here is that we don't scale stabilization feats to something that never created the realm in the first place since you said "Your argument has a false premise, not only is Lorule not even created from it, but something else (that being the big three)",
And I'm telling you that's a blatant false equivalence that ignores context, on both ends tbh.I'm telling you that's wrong when the world pillar in GoW qualifies for that alone despite not making the greek pantheon in the first place. Also I'd really appreciate it if you tone it down with the "battle boarding rotted brain" ad hominems here.
How exactly did you get to that level of AP again? Because last time I checked assuming the dimension is a full universe it would be far higher than tier 8 or 7, unless you agree with me that not every dimension, Lorule included automatically means a universe.
That's on you mate, everyone knows AP can be literally whatever the **** it wants, including reality warping btw.When I say physical feats I mean it in a general term not a literal term, why are you assuming this when I never once was arguing about Striking or LS to begin with in this entire thread?
Uh, no, it's still an absence of a feat. The 3-A didn't happen, ergo, it's not there, But you're taking it and twisting it into "oh because the realm DIDN'T vanish, it must be a anti-feat as well", which is the issue that literally nobody agrees with you on.That's not even what an absence of a feat is in the first place, Lorule's entire backstory revolves around the triforce being required for them to save their kingdom from collapse, the triforce being a core part of what made their land prosper, and the land falling apart when the triforce shatters is not an absence, it would be an absence if the collapse of Lorule had absolutely nothing to do with the triforce in the first place.
Lol no I don't? There's an explicit statement saying that Ganon augmented and consolidated the full of the Triforce's magical might within, something we know bolsters Ganon's strength and own magical power. If the Triforce has 3-A magical anything, that shit is scaling to Ganon, no way around it unless you decide to just twist shit or ignore the meaning behind said words.Then you're going to need to make a CRT for some form of UES for Zelda to be accepted since with the recent additions of UES, that needs some form of explanation for stuff like reality warping items to scale in terms of raw stats.
See above matey, you came into this thread arguing IT wasn't a universe but just a kingdom (lmao), your original proposition would entail the whole of the feat is barely Tier 7 because you argued it took, in your own words, centuries, for a kingdom to even get to a state of decay (Which then, go back to my point about how you didn't even think this through).Again I'd like to know where you're getting the tier 7 calc from in the first place, if you're basing this off of the assumption that Lorule isn't an entire universe then that just contradicts everything you tried to debunk about Lorule not being an alternate world.
My dude, I think the issue here is you yourself didn't even properly think through what your proposition actually suggests. I, of course, read it (unfortunately), but unlike you, I actually thought on it and went "oh hmm this entails a bunch of fucky stuff OP failed to mention or convey".No, I just don't like it when people don't pay attention to what my points were in the first place and make massive assumptions.
Uh, basic human reading comprehension? It's the page FOR sustainability feats?Can you give me the quote where it mentions it applies to characters who only have stabilization feats? Because I don't see it on the page.
And nobody gives a shit because Ganon funny go brrr, it scales to him even if reality warping as it's done via the Triforce's magic (as everything by it is done), which he took, consolidated within himself, and augmented his own magical might off itI literally said several times in this thread how Lorule's the only one remotely close to any physical feats to scale to AP, where the dark world is strictly just reality warping at best with no showings of the realm being made from scratch.
Glass, my dude, your ass has been getting destroyed this entire thread, just because you may not like it, you're losing.@DaReaperMan I'm repeating my points because no one has bothered going through addressing all of my points, especially in the part of the stabilization page where it said the user or object's overall power wouldn't even scale to the full dimension it's sustaining in the first place.
Alright alright, I'll use different terminology@DaReaperMan I'm not going to say I disagree, but you really need to settle down. Telling people, "They are getting **** pounded in the ass" is not an appropriate thing to bring up in a PG-13 website in a discussion about tiers of fictional characters.
Mate, I basically said I'd make it in the realm of PG-13, not that I'd remove all aggression from it, there's a really big difference between the two, but if you want it served to you in less aggressive terms than here you go: You are losing this thread and overall debate quite badly, and there are practically no people in your ball park here.@DaReaperMan you mean different wording? You can say the same thing in a way that doesn't sound aggressive.
You can still come off as a childish asshole with PG-13 language, I would recommend steering clear from that too.Mate, I basically said I'd make it in the realm of PG-13, not that I'd remove all aggression from it, there's a really big difference between the two