- 14,947
- 1,823
also as Dz said I thought he mean they were very far away "dimensionally". after all we know that sasuke requires dimensional coordinates to get to certain dimensions. Unlike Obito who literally had to look for them.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Kaguya's dimensions are Low 2-C in size
- Thread starter Kepekley23
- Start date
- Status
- 40,446
- 12,915
Wait...why isn't this an outlier? It just means the people wanting Naruto to be Low 2-C were right.
- 15,332
- 7,559
- Thread starter
- #43
And I'm interested on what Dzi said. If Obito actually said her spacetime was too far from the main one, instead of saying it is too large, then yeah, she can keep the 5-A and we can close the matter.
- 554
- 204
It's an outlier. Kep made sure to highlight that fact.The real cal howard said:
- 4,487
- 732
Not gonna lie, this got me to laughMatthew Schroeder said:
- 40,446
- 12,915
Nah I don't think so. I think it's time for Naruto vs Goku.
- 15,332
- 7,559
- Thread starter
- #47
^^ Even if it weren't, Naruto wouldn't even scale tho lol
- 5,428
- 1,786
Kaguya can just be Low 2-C with ESTB. Looks like it fits perfectly.
- 14,409
- 1,692
Well for future reference atleast if this is acceptable; anymore feats about dimensions from a Otsutsuki which has an unknown but is parallel to Naruto's dimension may very well jsut be universal in size as well.
So thank Kep; it maybe an outlier for Naruto god tiers, but jsut possibly we can get in down the line for God tier of Boruto
So thank Kep; it maybe an outlier for Naruto god tiers, but jsut possibly we can get in down the line for God tier of Boruto
- 554
- 204
Though it wouldn't be an outlier if Ikemoto dishes out his Galaxy busting Otsutsukis. ƒÿŃÿÅ We just have to wait...
- 554
- 204
Tier 3 at the very least. It looked like there was an entire cosmos in there.Js250476 said:
- 63,487
- 8,486
They would think you were on this post rejecting itKepekley23 said:
- 15,332
- 7,559
- Thread starter
- #55
Since one image is worth a thousand words:
- 63,487
- 8,486
- 10,749
- 6,479
To be fair you really should have expected that
- 3,464
- 794
He just wants to change the note to say that it is implied Kaguya's dimensions are Low 2-C instead of the Star thing. This doesn't=Low 2-C Naruto but on the other hand it just feels weird as well lmao.
- 5,554
- 2,328
@Kep you intentionally made a misleading post, why are you surprised?
Deleted member 2530
Guest
Isn't it a bit ridiculous reason to think that just because Obito failed it would be 2C?
- 15,332
- 7,559
- Thread starter
- #62
You mean the fact he all but literally stated "Her dimensions are incredibly more vast than the normal spacetime"? sure.Immortalgodd said:
This also has the good side-effect of dealing with the 4-C upgrade theads...as it is now Low 2-C and thus an undebatable (as long as Kodachi doesn't go all Goku vs. Beerus) outlier.
- 15,332
- 7,559
- Thread starter
- #63
I did, but the comments I was expecting were "You had me for a second" or the likes. Like...faith that people would read the OP, y'know.Ogbunabali said:
- 10,749
- 6,479
It's the fault of everyone who made Low 2-C Naruto impossible to discuss with a straight face
- 63,487
- 8,486
Anyway
This is a very basic fix, and the outlier is literally impossible to debate without being a wanker of the nith degree
I agree with the ETSB Downgrade
This is a very basic fix, and the outlier is literally impossible to debate without being a wanker of the nith degree
I agree with the ETSB Downgrade
Deleted member 2530
Guest
Though it does create an arguement for 2C Kaguya if she really was going to destroy the dimension
- 40,446
- 12,915
ETSB stands for eternal time scorching bomb. It scorches eternal time making Low 2-C consistent. Checkmate. Smh, calling it an outlier how dare you.
- 8,373
- 3,043
Jvando said:
- 10,749
- 6,479
It's still words tho...Kepekley23 said:
- 32,327
- 20,219
First of all I think interpreting Obito's line to say it's larger than a universe is a massive reach.
Second of all I still don't buy that this is entirely serious and not just Kep trolling.
Second of all I still don't buy that this is entirely serious and not just Kep trolling.
- 14,409
- 1,692
Larger or the same size it would still make it low 2C
Deleted member 2530
Guest
Hey Matt what happened about the 1A downgrade?
- 10,749
- 6,479
Either Kep is really dedicated to trolling or it's not a troll thread due to him repeatedly stating it isn't
- 378
- 107
- 3,464
- 794
I don't think this is a Troll thread. Kep is absolutely serious. I just tend to agree with Matt in that Obito's line implying Kaguya's dimension was bigger then the main universe is a stretch.
- 4,143
- 571
People in this thread pay too much attention to trolling and other staff rather than solving the issue.
- 15,332
- 7,559
- Thread starter
- #80
ETSB would become Low 2-C, thus an outlier and removed from profiles.
Third time. (is the charm)
Third time. (is the charm)
- Status
