- 4,716
- 4,209
Seems to be some shading on some rubbletake a look it. It's foot is not injured. It's just surrounding rubbleshttps://cdn.****************.com/file/CDN-M-A-N/jjk_23412_016.png
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Seems to be some shading on some rubbletake a look it. It's foot is not injured. It's just surrounding rubbleshttps://cdn.****************.com/file/CDN-M-A-N/jjk_23412_016.png
120% of Whatever they were is 1.2xThanks both of you I Kinda Get it now
Btw How much of an amp Black flash gives. Is it above 120% base or just 120 of their power?
https://cdn.****************.com/file/CDN-M-A-N/jjktcb_128_13.jpg
It has a stated amp of ^2.5. However, we obviously don't use that. At minimum, It'd be greater than a 3x greater than his base AP. Black Flash let him one-shot Mahito out of Instant Spirit Body of Distorted Killing and caused him to vomit. Said form is 200% tougher than his original form. Obviously this won't be treated as such in the profile due to there being no statement of it. But it could be treated as granting a 3x AP increase bare minimumThanks both of you I Kinda Get it now
Btw How much of an amp Black flash gives. Is it above 120% base or just 120 of their power?
https://cdn.****************.com/file/CDN-M-A-N/jjktcb_128_13.jpg
It has a stated amp of ^2.5. However, we obviously don't use that. At minimum, It'd be greater than a 3x greater than his base AP. Black Flash let him one-shot Mahito out of Instant Spirit Body of Distorted Killing and caused him to vomit. Said form is 200% tougher than his original form. Obviously this won't be treated as such in the profile due to there being no statement of it. But it could be treated as granting a 3x AP increase bare minimumMaybe you could make a CRT to get it accepted as such? If DB could get SS2 accepted as a 500x increase, it doesn't seem implausible.
120% of Whatever they were is 1.2x
I see thanks .Oh, you mean the 120% thing. Yeah, just a 1.2x increase as @Shey said.
Don't think we scale Yuki's Black Hole to anyone but her, no. Only way that'd get accepted is if Sukuna or Gojo get their own Planetary feat or statement. And even then, people might be skeptical.Gege has wierd ways of giving multipliers. Lmao
I see thanks .
Btw Yuki Black Hole scales somewhere?
Tanking Black hole scales anywhere? Tengen Barriers are strong enough to hold it back.Don't think we scale Yuki's Black Hole to anyone but her, no. Only way that'd get accepted is if Sukuna or Gojo get their own Planetary feat or statement. And even then, people might be skeptical.
Surviving it's Gravity from a distance is fine, yeah. Just not the creation of it. @Arkenis calc'd Kenjaku surviving its pull. Didn't calc Tengen's barrier tanking it though. Didn't consider it, but it would indeed have to survive the gravitational pull of it from whatever distance it was away from the surface area.Tanking Black hole scales anywhere? Tengen Barriers are strong enough to hold it back.
https://cdn.****************.com/file/CDN-M-A-N/jjktcb_208_so4_017.png
I think it amps the power when only at the beginning shot. But gege failed to display it in every occasion or give a better feats for other characters.The only way the BF amp could make sense was if Gege stated that cursed energy reinforcment divided damage rather than subtract damage.
Instant Spirit Body has 200% of the strength of Mahito's original form, it's not 200% strongerIt has a stated amp of ^2.5. However, we obviously don't use that. At minimum, It'd be greater than a 3x greater than his base AP. Black Flash let him one-shot Mahito out of Instant Spirit Body of Distorted Killing and caused him to vomit. Said form is 200% tougher than his original form. Obviously this won't be treated as such in the profile due to there being no statement of it. But it could be treated as granting a 3x AP increase bare minimumMaybe you could make a CRT to get it accepted as such? If DB could get SS2 accepted as a 500x increase, it doesn't seem implausible.
Yeah the multiplier is insane, to put it in simple terms, if a 6 years old kid hit you with a blackflash, it will be similar to this:
Well it's not copy more like eating and storing thing. Absorption and Power Mimicry works differently you see.I think Sukuna's ace is his "open" technique, and maybe another thing like lightning or something like that, I don't think he copies or steals people CTs and it would be lame since Yuta can do something similar.
This man made Black Flash an exponent since it was more impressive than a multiplier to represent a power increase, but all his multipliers are x1.2 or x2Yeah Gege made it pretty clear he really wanted to use the black flash exponent but man is that some kind of insanity when put in a power scaling setting.
One eyed cat momentThis man made Black Flash an exponent since it was more impressive than a multiplier to represent a power increase, but all his multipliers are x1.2 or x2
It just sounds like it's 200% stronger than that of its original form. Which would be 3x. At worst 2x. Instead of using percent's in that sentence, replace it with "3x" and see what it comes out as.Its strength is 200% that of its original form
Yeah she said Yuji and Todo can harm her with their regular attacks, Dagon seems to be more durable than Hanami tbfEven outside of this wiki's standards with energy and whatnot, Hanami being durable enough to eat 4 consecutive Black Flashes and a strike from Playful Cloud kind of puts a wrench in that ^2.5 exponent because Todo and Yuji's regular attacks shouldn't even phase him in that case...
if a train that has seating for 100 people is at 200% capacity then it has 200 people in it because 100% capacity is 100 so 200% is 200, not 300.It just sounds like it's 200% stronger than that of its original form. Which would be 3x. At worst 2x. Instead of using percent's in that sentence, replace it with "3x" and see what it comes out as.
That would be the case if the page worded it differently. If it meant to say he was at 200% capacity, it would've stated "His strength is at 200%", not "His strength is 200% that of its original power". The use of the word "that" implies an increase off of his normal form. That's why I said replace 200% with a multiplier, and if the wording makes it seem as though his power increases, then it's an amp off of base. "It's strength is 3x that of its original form".if a train that has seating for 100 people is at 200% capacity then it has 200 people in it because 100% capacity is 100 so 200% is 200, not 300.
That doesn't make sense, if a commentator said "their strength is 100% that of his" then that means two fighters are equal, not that one is 2x stronger than the other. If I said "his power is 50% that of his" then that means one dude is 0.5x weaker than the other guy, not 1.5x stronger.That would be the case if the page worded it differently. If it meant to say he was at 200% capacity, it would've stated "His strength is at 200%", not "His strength is 200% that of its original power". The use of the word "that" implies an increase off of his normal form. That's why I said replace 200% with a multiplier, and if the wording makes it seem as though his power increases, then it's an amp off of base. "It's strength is 3x that of its original form".
You gave an entirely different example which will of course change the meaning. We're talking about a transformation that increases your strength. Not two different fighters.That doesn't make sense, if a commentator said "their strength is 100% that of his" then that means two fighters are equal, not that one is 2x stronger than the other. If I said "his power is 50% that of his" then that means one dude is 0.5x weaker than the other guy, not 1.5x stronger.
No, you'd say "Your strength is 100% greater than (that of) when you started" to indicate a 2x increase, your original sentence would mean that there was no difference between then and now. Saying "Your strength/performance is 50% that of when you started" makes even less sense in a situation where you're talking about an increase of 1.5x, you'd have to specify by including "greater than" in the sentence otherwise you'd get very confused looks in a conversation.If you started working out, and I claimed "Your strength/performance is 100% that of when you started", that means your performance has increased by 100%. Not that you didn't get any better at all. We're talking about a single person here, and a transformation that increases their toughness at that. The context dictates that "that of" would mean "greater than" here. As both are used to compare two sets of data. And the context is that it's an increase of which we're given a specified amount. This is exactly why I suggested the multiplier method. If the sentence is grammatically correct with the use of a multiplier, it's talking about solely a increase.
Mannn, had a response ready, went to check a notification, and now it's gone. I guess it doesn't auto-save after all.No, you'd say "Your strength is 100% greater than (that of) when you started" to indicate a 2x increase, your original sentence would mean that there was no difference between then and now. Saying "Your strength/performance is 50% that of when you started" makes even less sense in a situation where you're talking about an increase of 1.5x, you'd have to specify by including "greater than" in the sentence otherwise you'd get very confused looks in a conversation.
In that context, the text would change to "100% greater than" not "100% that of," they are not interchangeable in this case because you have to use different phrases to match the context. Both multipliers of 2x and 3x are amps so I don't see how the train of thought that "200% that of" now means "3x that of" because it's an increase works.Mannn, had a response ready, went to check a notification, and now it's gone. I guess it doesn't auto-save after all.
To summarize what I said; That of and Greater than are interchangeable if the context is specifically referring to growth. Both are used to draw a comparison between two things. And if the context of the comparison is about growth, than "that of" can be used as a replacement for "greater than". If you're told you significantly improved since your last time in the gym, followed by "your results are 100% that of your last results" you know it could only mean 100% greater due to the context already provided. The fact viz translated this to mean 200% tougher makes it seem even more obvious that it's meant to be interpreted as a 200% increase rather than just a 100% increase.
I'll respond after I get another translation of the raw. I'm working on one rn since the one in the imgur link seems sketch (translated awkwardly).In that context, the text would change to "100% greater than" not "100% that of," they are not interchangeable in this case because you have to use different phrases to match the context. Both multipliers of 2x and 3x are amps so I don't see how the train of thought that "200% that of" now means "3x that of" because it's an increase works.
When you compare two values by using "that of" you find the fractional value of what is being what is being compared. if x is 20% that of y then x = 20/100 y = 1/5 y. So if x is 200% that of y then x = 200/100 y = 2y
When you say "greater than" you apply percentage increases so if x is 200% greater than y then x = 100% of y + 200% of y which is 3y because "greater than" means to exceed a given limit which is 100% of y in this case.
I think Hanami has better durability featsYeah she said Yuji and Todo can harm her with their regular attacks, Dagon seems to be more durable than Hanami tbf
Not really, Hanami can be harmed by normal hits from Yuji and Todo, Dagon received 0 damage from Nanami and Naobito, Yuji at shibuya is physically equal to NanamiI think Hanami has better durability feats
?
hmm, ig.take a look it. It's foot is not injured. It's just surrounding rubbleshttps://cdn.****************.com/file/CDN-M-A-N/jjk_23412_016.png
Naobito was the only one of the 3 damaging DagonDagon received 0 damage from Nanami and Naobito
?
also sukuna says 4km. where does 3.7km come from?
also couldn't one simply account for how fast it traveled before Sukuna reacted? (and divide from there or whatever. idk) feels like it could still be calced.
The translations seems to be contradicted, the leaker translated it as 4km but TCB says less than 4km, we should wait for vizCalc already subtracts the distance before Sukuna reacted. But yeah, if there is a stated 4km distance, it should be used instead.