• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

James Ramírez vs Cool Cat

Oh, I didn't see his durability.

Yeah, if Broadway Force exists Cool Cat wins. Otherwise I don't see how Cool Cat could win.
 
BigSmoke4269 said:
Oh, I didn't see his durability.

Yeah, if Broadway Force exists Cool Cat wins. Otherwise I don't see how Cool Cat could win.
I mean, iirc, If he's baseline 9-C, he can still get harmed by a 10-A attack (but barely)

And Cool Cat's Broadway force doesn't even seem legit so
 
Seems like the thread was made for James to get a win.

I mean, you know it's bad when OP inmediatly starts giving reasons as to why a character would win.
 
Uh, I made this because of the Cool Cat spam

And there is nothing wrong with the OP giving reasons why one side would win

And Cool Cat can still harm James as his durability is like basline 9-C

And I'm pretty sure Cool Cat can win so
 
well the thing is, phineas has supernatural luck and his luck has it so that an asteroid could land on CC or a train could derail and run him over or his punches/kicks could miss phineas every time or he could end up breaking his bones before he even has a chance to hit phineas

Edit: nvm it's passive probability manipulation, but my point still stands
 
Back
Top