• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Issues with Patchy the Pirate

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sure, but he still have never used on someone and yet people argues about him using on versus, which should be disregarded. Same thing with his plothax. Heck, it doesnt even work offensively.

Uh, just by reading Lady Death's profile it already tells you that she had engaged on battles before
 
It is actually somewhat important for the character to show any combat related feat in order to be considered as being able to fight, though it can be excused under the reason that it's self-evident for a character to use said hax to protect himself, in-character.

Just stating, not picking a side yet since I don't recall the character well enough
 
Which it is in this case. We can assume patchy would. He really only used it when upset or in danger. He even used time stop specifically in a dangerous situation. A fight would be both of those.The closest we got against it is "he hasn't used it in a fight". But that's cause he doesn't fight on screen. Which while can have an effect. In this case, it shouldn't have much. Patchys character and how he reacts should support what he likely does. More supporting evidence on that side then him not

As well, since we don't have he he would react to in a fight. We do see how he reacts to problems he has. Which he typically reacts with haxs. Time hacks the most. So it makes sense if someone is trying to kill him, he would consider the hack he uses in a lot of situations bad to him. It isn't like patchy is a pacifist. Or even shows remote signs of that. If you pissed him off, he probably would fight. The fact he can be childish would further support that. Someone childish would far more likely resort to that then Someone Whos more mature.
 
Has he used them offensively, first off?

Because if not, you're being too speculative. This isn't like "X Character has a gun, so he would use it" this is questioning whether his hax even have the capability to be used offensively. That's what I'm asking
 
So you want to argue that a character won't even fking punch under SBA?
 
He hasn't gotten offensive on screen is the problem. But in a situation that was gonna be dangerous to him, he used his hack. That's the best we have to go off of combat wise. He tends to solve problems with hacks. And since we don't really see him fight. But we have seen him use hacks when in danger, and use hacks to solver his issues. Seems to make sense he would use them in a Fight. Unless he gets in fights and shows not to use them. The best we have is, he uses hacks when it's dangerous, and to solve problems
 
So that's implying they're OOC to use in combat, and only applicable in evasive situations, doesn't it?

And if you have to bloodlust a character every single match because he wouldn't even use said abilities to harm others, isn't it the same thing Barney is going through?

Idk dude, overall I'm neutral because idrc, but this seems like it's leaning more on the side of the OP
 
His character and personality supports he would fight. He isn't put in situations he needs to fight in. But his attitude would support him fighting. He is childish. Resorts to anger pretty quickly. When he was in danger. He resorted to time hacks

And most abilities aren't really harmful to say. Time hacks aren't harmful, they are just helpful to his side. Undoing stuff and stopping time. Both things he think about using. As he has in a bad situation to him. the most he has that's harmful to say is Plot hacks. Which is just manipulating the ending into his favor.

SBA says they are in character but willing to fight. In character, patchy would be willing to fight. He can be aggressive and angry with even lower things. And if we see him use hacks in character in a situation dangerous to him. A fights dangerous. Why wouldn't he use them? If in character, he used it in a dangerous situation, he likely uses it here. Patchy isn't shown to have a non violent or pacifist like attitude. He is an easily angered pirate who can be agreeable and childish.
 
Oblivion Of The Endless said:
Can I have a scan of his plothax turning the things on his favor in a fight?
I've told y'all this already. I don't have the scans myself. Have to ask the person who put it on there.
 
i looked at the history of the page and its been there ever since the page was made, but the guy who made it is globally blocked so rip
 
In character he uses them as evasive maneuvers, he doesn't use them once for attacking the other person.

And SBA doesn't just bloodlust them so they're unstoppable killing machines. What makes you think he'll even use said hax and not like, just punch the other person.

The argument isn't that he won't use them, the arguments why would he use them and them only?
 
If the guy that added plothax is globally banned and no one else has scans to prove it, then it should be removed or deemed not combat applicable via lack of information
 
I didn't say it bloodlusted then. Just using what logical way a person would react to a situation like that would be. He tends to be at large distances in his fights. If he was like right in front of them. Sure. That could effect how he plays the fight. He tends to be at a large distance. So he would be more bound to use what stuff that can activate at range. After all. He does think of them. Time hacks the most,

He would use them cause it's the most logical thing he would think of based on his thought process and character. As well as just general way a person would react. And I wasn't saying he opens with only them. That's his biigger opener cause that's what he has used the most.
 
Oblivion Of The Endless said:
If the guy that added plothax is globally banned and no one else has scans to prove it, then it should be removed or deemed not combat applicable via lack of information
Globally banned? What now?
 
well, his discord tag is right there on his profile so maybe someone could ask there ┬»\_(Òâä)_/┬»
 
Patchy isn't a "general person", if you remember the show. Him and "logical" don't go together
 
He both is and isn't. He has been described just a standard suburban guy by Tom Kenny. The only thing notably different about him was his love and addiction for Spongebob, and he dressed like a Pirate.
 
Sorry for sounding rude, but like, play any clip of him. You yourself said he's immature af and thus is likely not smart enough to do any hax-based stomping
 
Well. Yea. He is childish. But if he wasn't smart enough to use the hacks in a situation to help him. Why has he used them on multiple occasions before to help himself
 
He used them to help himself, not kill a guy. Both aren't exactly the same now, are they?
 
Not like he really minds hurting others. He even was trying to force Potty's band to jump off a plank at the top of his building.
 
Well no. He just tried to shoo them off the plank. He had no reason to use a hack there. He wasn't in any danger. He has shown like with Potty he is stronger. He can just kinda rag doll them if he wanted. But he was making them do the jumping.
 
So lemme get this straight, he wants someone to **** off, he has hax to do it, and he doesn't.

Hmm... seems like someone doesn't use hax for harming others for whatever reason... almost like its OOC
 
Ok. Sorry. I'm back. I talked to him in Discord about it.

" It's from the original version of Shanghaied, where he changed the ending so SpongeBob could win and that Patrick and Squidward's ending couldn't become canon"
 
Ionliosite said:
I honestly agree with the ban. Sorry, Butter, but this is just Barney all over again.
Barney is activaly pacifist like and wouldn't consider combat to the slightest

Patchy is a Pirate who is hot tempered, has threatened people before, and given indications he is an actual pirate that goes out at sea.

Barney has an attitude that would support him not wanting to fight at all. Patchy has tried to force potty's band to jump off a building. If we ban patchy. Then that's opening a thread to band thousands of pages
 
He didn't use hacks against the people who could kill with one hand. Quite strange indeed. Not like it was completely unnecessary
 
I guess he's fine to stay unbanned, but the obvious wank with his In-character attittude should be dropped.
 
Well his plot hax doesn't seem combat applicable...Like at all, his time hax seems more open to discussion. (most toon force characters Ive seen enjoy beating the heck out of each other, with and without hax...)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top