- 1,137
- 1,153
Now hear me out, I have an idea: Since it’s data it should be 10-C, but within the eScape it’s Low 2-C.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Iron Man Weapon Pages
- Thread starter Newendigo
- Start date
- 165,705
- 73,447
Agreed.This armor is LITERALLY a data entity, it's ******* 10-C, not Low 2-C
Iron Man Armor Model 63 | VS Battles Wiki | Fandom
The Godbuster armor originated from eScape, a virtual reality developed by Tony Stark. When Tony was hijacked by the eScape's rogue operating system Motherboard, he eventually freed himself from her influence and rebelled against her. The escape freed Tony's mind from the constraints of the...vsbattles.fandom.com
- 9,331
- 3,315
Even if The Godbuster is stronger in eScape than in the real world, it should still have something like White Face, where it has a key inside-eScape and in the real world
And its real world key shouldn't even be 10-C since it casually one-shot The Controller and is apparently Tony's strongest armor
And its real world key shouldn't even be 10-C since it casually one-shot The Controller and is apparently Tony's strongest armor
- 11,805
- 7,368
The MAJORITY of their verse is a data entity, that's why.
MAJORITY of Marvel Comics however, isn't.
I'm downgrading it to 10-C, don't need random tier 2s based entirely in Data to confuse users on the already confusing Marvel cosmology.
- 9,331
- 3,315
It being 10-C makes no sense, how could The Controller go from Normal Iron man level to hulkbuster level with the power of a hundred 10-Cs?
White Face has a "In-Game" key. Why shouldn't The Godbuster have that?
Last edited:
- 11,805
- 7,368
Also I want a rule up that no armor will be made unless the user gets permission to work on it here. We have massive portions of the verse to work on not getting ****** up to clean up behind absolute randos
Have you even read the comic this comes from?
...because he is actually using the power of the users, who are typically 10-B and above, and they're millions? It won't be 5-A admittedly but that is just mechanics-PIS
Have you even read the comic this comes from?
- 7,461
- 2,875
- Thread starter
- #370
We are supposed to do team work here and you haven't made a single contribution in this entire thread previously.
- 9,331
- 3,315
Really? I must have skipped the part where he said that. Sorry
But a key "In-eSpace" and a "Real World" still works. That's what White Face does.
Last edited:
- 9,331
- 3,315
It shouldn't even be 10-C tho. When Tony made it in the real world it one-shot The Controller and Arno Stark deemed it as Tony's masterpiece and described it as the "ultimate weapon" and when Ironheart scanned The Godkiller Armor, its power readings were off the scale, and the armor radiated much more power than anything she had ever seen.
It should be like at least 5-A
It should be like at least 5-A
- 11,805
- 7,368
Again. MOST of White Face's verse, is him in the virtual world.
MOST of Marvel Comics isn't.
We only do it for former cases, not latter
No, then it gets a key for Real World if it can transfer between the two, the 10-C and at least 5-A.
Also Arno's and Ironheart's claims imo have fuckall reliability because Stark has still made more impressive shit than a Low 2-C armor anyways
- 9,331
- 3,315
Why would it be 10-C in eScape? If someone fights The Godbuster in eScape it wouldn't be 10-C, it would be Low 2-C
- 11,805
- 7,368
Yes tbh
...because it's him as a data entity? When have I stated I was making a key for him in eScape?
- 1,137
- 1,153
At this point, even if is Low 2-C its pretty underwhelming for a Low 2-C anyways, so I don't mind the downgrade.
Also like Obber said, we could just have it at unknown or straight up delete it
Also like Obber said, we could just have it at unknown or straight up delete it
- 1,137
- 1,153
Yeah. I believe that's why we never had a key for this model even before this thread began.
- 9,331
- 3,315
what was the first key gonna be? If someone enters the eScape and fights The Godbuster, wouldn't it be Low 2-C?
- 15,808
- 12,147
I'm of the opinion that even less relevant armors shouldn't be deleted if the profiles are decently made. So while I'm ok with a deletion that is only for pages of low quality.
- 9,331
- 3,315
Model 63 can be fixed?
It can have two keys
One for eScape and one in The Real World, Since Tony made it in the real World
and It one-shot The Controller, so the real world key can "At least 5-A" or even 4-B, since Tony was making the Ultron-Buster during this time
It can have two keys
One for eScape and one in The Real World, Since Tony made it in the real World
and It one-shot The Controller, so the real world key can "At least 5-A" or even 4-B, since Tony was making the Ultron-Buster during this time
- 11,805
- 7,368
First key is him in his data form.
If someone enters eScape, guess-guess? They're a data being, y'know, like how it is in the ******* comic, where only data characters were able to relevantly enter eScape? So it'll be a 10-C fighting a 10-C. Most Data Beings relevantly enough, have datamanip to yeet Stark.
So this is wank to have a Low 2-C Stark when everything in the ******* verse treats eScape as a 10-C construct.
- 1,137
- 1,153
I think there should be more evidence for Model 42 being 5-A, rather than just stalemating Doc. Doom. There's a lot more evidence supporting 5-A missing on the profile that we could use.
- 9,331
- 3,315
Yeah, that makes sense.
But could the real world key be Low 2-C? Since Tony built to be as similar to the original as possible to the eScape one, and even if it is 10-C within eScape, who's to say The Godbuster cannot preform the same feat it did in the eScape?
- 15,808
- 12,147
why does it matter if a character is fodder?
there's a pretty ******' big difference between hacking a data world and hacking a real-life dimension.
- 7,461
- 2,875
- Thread starter
- #388
The Low 2-C is not even solid.
You haven't read a single thread of what happened to SAO with their virtual bs didn't you? You complety glossed over my comment about case by case basis, and you are still ignoring Impress saying that the verse doesn't freaking treat eScape as a Low 2-C construct.
Cease and desist.
You haven't read a single thread of what happened to SAO with their virtual bs didn't you? You complety glossed over my comment about case by case basis, and you are still ignoring Impress saying that the verse doesn't freaking treat eScape as a Low 2-C construct.
Cease and desist.
- 9,331
- 3,315
Sorry. But wouldn't it be at least like 3-A compared to someone in the eScape?
- 11,805
- 7,368
Because I think this feels like manipulating stats to make him not fodder
Who's to say it could, mate, you have to prove that. You haven't proven that. Hence, it can't perform the same feat it did in the eScape.
Also 616 is a 2-A, possibly Low 1-C structure. It can't do that regardless.
- 7,461
- 2,875
- Thread starter
- #391
Adam.
If the escape is 10-C because is just a virtual world and is treated as such.
And Godbusters destroys this virtual 10-C construct.
And the armor is constructed in real life.
Why the hell, would be Low 2-C or High 3-A or anything, when the only thing it destroyed, was a virtual, fake, 10-C world.
If the escape is 10-C because is just a virtual world and is treated as such.
And Godbusters destroys this virtual 10-C construct.
And the armor is constructed in real life.
Why the hell, would be Low 2-C or High 3-A or anything, when the only thing it destroyed, was a virtual, fake, 10-C world.
- 11,805
- 7,368
Stark can barely create something to wreck the Phoenix Force, not without Pym's help at least, how the **** can he create ANYTHING capable of busting a universe?
His own shit struggles to hit 4-B
His own shit struggles to hit 4-B
- 11,805
- 7,368
Be deleted, someone else can make it in the future in better quality and stats, page is extremely poor by comics standards anyways.
- 165,705
- 73,447
Didn't he create an armor that can fight Celestials? Mind you, anything Jason Aaron touches gets a very dishonest and distorted propagandistic strawman personality with completely ignored and mutilated continuity, and extremely irrational and inconsistent power levels, but nevertheless. It still happened. The Celestials were only 4-B at best in that story though.
- 165,705
- 73,447
Okay. Please link to the profile here, so I can remove it then.
All of the links to it need to be updated as well though.
- 1,137
- 1,153
Iron Man Armor Model 63 | VS Battles Wiki | Fandom
The Godbuster armor originated from eScape, a virtual reality developed by Tony Stark. When Tony was hijacked by the eScape's rogue operating system Motherboard, he eventually freed himself from her influence and rebelled against her. The escape freed Tony's mind from the constraints of the...
vsbattles.fandom.com
- 165,705
- 73,447
I deleted the page.
These other pages need to have their links to it updated: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere?target=Iron+Man+Armor+Model+63&namespace=0
I suppose that we could add some kind of Marvel Comics-specific discussion rule, but I would need suggestions for a good wording.
These other pages need to have their links to it updated: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere?target=Iron+Man+Armor+Model+63&namespace=0
I suppose that we could add some kind of Marvel Comics-specific discussion rule, but I would need suggestions for a good wording.
- 792
- 589
So for that, since the Celestials didn't really show 2-A levels of power in that story, how would the scaling work? Would we just say 4-B, or would we still use Celestial scaling from other stories to support 2-A?
