Fully Embedding Wikidot Backrooms into Vs Battles Wiki

[Iiliminal]

Alright well this is it.
Not a big start, so no cosmology blogs or a verse page, simply new profiles for low tier entities that are part of the main canon of the Wikidot (no extended stuff for now). The big stuff will happen later during the year.
Backrooms legitimacy was discussed both here and here. These profiles are based on the Backrooms Wikidot's main canon which was deemed strict enough for indexing.

Spoiler: The Profiles

Entity 2 - The Windows

vsbattles.fandom.com

Entity 3 - The Smiler

vsbattles.fandom.com

Entity 5 - Clumps

vsbattles.fandom.com

Entity 6 - Dullers

vsbattles.fandom.com

Entity 7 - Jerry

vsbattles.fandom.com

Entity 8 - The Hound

vsbattles.fandom.com

Entity 10 - Skin-Stealer

vsbattles.fandom.com

Level 30 - Shifted Beyond Reality

vsbattles.fandom.com

Entity 97 - Scream Eaters

vsbattles.fandom.com

Entity 121

vsbattles.fandom.com

 

[Unkn0wnAether]

how gnarly totally not cause i'm involved with this

 

[RoggerReggor]

LETS GOOO!

Another verse with weird numerical values after a keyword after SCP.

 

[Deidalius]

I think the backrooms should be added as long as they don't flow the wiki with overpowered characters that are almost OCs and as long as they don't infringe copyright rules.

 

[ShionAH]

LETS GOOO!

Another verse with weird numerical values after a keyword after SCP.

Bro weakest SCP character probably solos backrooms

 

[RoggerReggor]

Bro weakest SCP character probably solos backrooms

Idc about that, I just am talking about how both the verses have characters with weird names rofl.

 

[ShionAH]

Idc about that, I just am talking about how both the verses have characters with weird names rofl.

Jerry>Scp verse

 

[RoggerReggor]

Jerry>Scp verse

If that's Jerry from Tom and Jerry, then it's an overkill and Jerry stomps bro.

BTW, where does the backrooms cosmology scale to according to your opinion? I don't know much about that since I am not really much into the backrooms. Like, does any character have the potential to be boundless or smth?

 

[Kazuma_kuwabara]

Disagree with letting backrooms enter to VSBW

 

[ShionAH]

If that's Jerry from Tom and Jerry, then it's an overkill and Jerry stomps bro.

Fax

BTW, where does the backrooms cosmology scale to according to your opinion? I don't know much about that since I am not really much into the backrooms. Like, does any character have the potential to be boundless or smth?

If we use fanon then probably, canon? Eh at best H3-A.

 

[ShockingPsychic]

Both the threads you linked in the OP seem to say the backrooms aren't allowed. I was apart of one them, and remember that being the consensus

 

[RoggerReggor]

Fax

Jerry beyond tiering, he entered the real world and is now the mouse below my computer table which I am trying to get rid of from like a day.

If we use fanon then probably, canon? Eh at best H3-A.

Fanon? So is SCP. SCP is entirely fan-fiction to be accurate.

 

[Ped2018]

Both the threads you linked in the OP seem to say the backrooms aren't allowed. I was apart of one them, and remember that being the consensus

Not the second one, check the staff opinions on the end of the second page.

 

[ShionAH]

Fanon? So is SCP. SCP is entirely fan-fiction to be accurate.

True lol

 

[Livinmeme]

I blame /x/ for this

 

[Unkn0wnAether]

okay so i did some research, and ironically enough, the SCP Foundation originates from a /x/ post about the original SCP-173. So I don't see why the Backrooms should be treated any different.

 

[Iiliminal]

BTW, where does the backrooms cosmology scale to according to your opinion? I don't know much about that since I am not really much into the backrooms. Like, does any character have the potential to be boundless or smth?

its not tier 0

 

[Greatsage13th]

Now we wait for staff

 

[Iiliminal]

bump

 

[Greatsage13th]

Just ask staff to come here

 

[Iiliminal]

who to ask tho

 

[Greatsage13th]

who to ask tho

Every single one.

 

[Damage3245]

I'm not so sure the Backrooms has enough notability or legitimacy to qualify for here.

 

[ZillertheBucko]

well if they were already accepted then I don't see why not

 

[Damage3245]

well if they were already accepted then I don't see why not

It was re-debated on this thread which didn't seem to end with a decision to allow the Backrooms.

 

[Unkn0wnAether]

doesnt scp literally go by the same canon rules? i dont see why we can't just treat it the same. both originated in the same way and just kinda. expanded into bigger things

 

[Greatsage13th]

It was re-debated on this thread which didn't seem to end with a decision to allow the Backrooms.

That's an old thread. Out with the old in with the new they say. Each to their own timeline.

 

[Unkn0wnAether]

oh yeah that thread is also nearing a year old didn't realize

 

[Iiliminal]

Bump

 

[Deagonx]

These profiles are based on the Backrooms Wikidot's main canon which was deemed strict enough for indexing.

Reading the thread which discussed this, it looks like this was actually not the case. This is the last tally that was given:

On the topic of Backrooms content on Wikidot, 19 users (11 staff) are against it being allowed on the wiki in its current state, while 9 users (7 staff) are for it being allowed in its current state.

But it looks like a concrete decision wasn't made, exactly, in the sense that it was closed with a distinct policy on Wikidot Backrooms.

@Moritzva would you be able to help clarify the conclusions of the Backroom discussion, as you see them?

 

[BLS]

Either you let Backrooms in or disallow SCP along with it

 

[Moritzva]

Either you let Backrooms in or disallow SCP along with it

Not the case.

Now, the first conversation on this happened a long time ago, so it would be good help if someone could link the previous thread. That being said, a lot of Backrooms content was deemed far too lenient and lax for the wiki, and SCP was noted to have significantly higher standards. I can’t really debate the specifics without looking over the previous thread because I can’t remember shit.

 

[BLS]

noted to have significantly higher standards.

How so? In actually contributing to the site or the over all quality? The former yes, it is harder to actually add to it, but it's not impossible for random people online like me and whatever to get in there and artificially inflate powerlevels for battleboarding. The latter is subjective and if stuff like Velma has profiles, there shouldn't be a discussion on this specifically

That aside some SCP's blatantly infringe on Copyright like Here.

 

[Unkn0wnAether]

pretty sure you dont even make money off writing scp content

 

[BLS]

pretty sure you dont even make money off writing scp content

It just feels weird when some SCP's literally use other verses in their stories like Minecraft or Kirby etc. Also i'm pretty sure that even if you don't make money off copyrighted work, it's still infringing on their IP, hence why Nintendo can take down fanworks. Could be wrong ofcourse, not a legal expert

 

[Livinmeme]

It just feels weird when some SCP's literally use other verses in their stories like Minecraft or Kirby etc. Also i'm pretty sure that even if you don't make money off copyrighted work, it's still infringing on their IP, hence why Nintendo can take down fanworks. Could be wrong ofcourse, not a legal expert

Nop. Nintendo actually can't do anything toward fangames if they somehow go to the court, the problem is defending yourself legally costs a **** ton of money

 

[Livinmeme]

Taeshi's unability to portray characters as sympathic only with an absurd amount of victimization is known to everyone. Don't you remember the "at least you still have a mom part?"

NU SCP writting sucks. It's either a self fullfilment shitty fantasy or bleach level powerlevel

 

[BLS]

Nop. Nintendo actually can't do anything toward fangames if they somehow go to the court, the problem is defending yourself legally costs a **** ton of money

If that's true then point taken

NU SCP writting sucks. It's either a self fullfilment shitty fantasy or bleach level powerlevel

Yeah, have to agree.

 

[Iiliminal]

bump

 

[KingNanaya]

no