- 21,469
- 30,790
Doesn’t the universe have borders?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No its literally not, we know the universe doesn't actually look like how its conveyed, it varies throughout the series.It's a blatant visual contradiction my dude.
Yes it matters completely, if they are separated by a higher dimensional space they will look finite from the neutral zone, like wtf?This doesn't matter? It doesn't change what they look like.
Based on? That happened in real time, we see two spheres, filled with nebulae, galaxies, and more, why in the world are we assuming "nuh uh it fake", it is LITERALLY what they look without artistic license or representation.
Give me, an actual hard statement saying this so "purely visual" as if we don't see non visual stuff like shenron's light at the exact same time.
Tbh I would've agreed with the CRT but Super ******* hates ya dog
Like that is not infinite, and they show them a few times too iirc.
And whys that?I don't really agree with making the physical universe of Dragon Ball infinite.
In what capacity?Doesn’t the universe have borders?
In truth no.This ain't an argument, this is literally what they look like without fluff
Space-time barriers, so 4D barriers yeah.Doesn’t the universe have borders?
In truth no.
If it were literally like this, universe 7 would be 3-A and not 2-C as we see.
This visual representation is from universe 7, which has the living universe, the other world and the world of kaioshins that is outside the main macrosm.
We basically see ourselves from a higher dimensional perspective, as each universe is basically a multiverse and everything we see in visual representation is a normal universe.
If we see ourselves from a higher dimensional perspective, we would not see the three-dimensional size of the space of the universe from the outside.
alive.
A finite four-dimensional box can fit infinite 3-D space inside it, and we wouldn't see that finite from a higher perspective, only the finite box.
Dude, this is the SINGLE time it is quite literally shown. It isn't a map, some dude yapping, an artistic representation, it is literally the universe shown directly.No its literally not, we know the universe doesn't actually look like how its conveyed, it varies throughout the series.
No they wouldn't? It's just a dimensional wall, we can literally see into them. The fact we can see into them, and the inside is blatantly finite, well sucks ig. And what does it being a higher-D wall matter? It can still be finite in scale, that's what the "space" part entails.Yes it matters completely, if they are separated by a higher dimensional space they will look finite from the neutral zone, like wtf?
And how would we know? That shit may as well be non-visible. And hell, you said yourself, it varies all the time, why take any of that literally as opposed to the actual time we see them?Because this BLATNATLY does not show all the parts of the universe like the afterlife, hell, kaioshin realm, its so obviously just a representation, its not what the actual universe looks like in full scope, we have been over this so many times.
Comprised of とんでもない, or an "unthinkable; unexpected; absurd; outrageous; preposterous; terrible" number of galaxies. Unquantifiable.Later on jaco comments on bulma wanting to go to the center of the universe and tells her she it stupid for even wanting to try because of how massive the universe is, being composed of "Countless galaxies"
Because the number of galaxies is as vast as Jaco claims, travelling to the center of the universe is infeasible.and that it's not possible.
Jaco never discredited her knowing of the edge and the center of the universe, he only shot down her desire to explore said regions of space.Which shows bulma as not a credible source and the statement shouldn't be taken seriously when deciding cosmology
The television series provides a visual of said edge and center of the universe.especially since we have never seen this so called edge of the universe at all.
And what Jaco co-signs.You can easily just knock this statement off as bulma saying they are on the edge of the universe based off what she herself knows.
Never implied.Or in other words, this is only in reference to the observable universe
Not that the place is non-existent, though.that confirms jaco's statement to be true that there is no way of going to a place like that.
This is the second time you've said thisHyperbole, inconsistent, outlier, out of context.
In fact, this is the edge of just a single galaxy, see other galaxies shining in the backgroundThe television series provides a visual of said edge and center of the universe.
And the universes have been shown multiple times, sometimes they are different, but based on how we know all the different realms look, it means that what we are shown isnt what the actual universe looks like.Dude, this is the SINGLE time it is quite literally shown. It isn't a map, some dude yapping, an artistic representation, it is literally the universe shown directly.
Buddy we literally know that parallel universes are separated by a higher dimensional space, the spacetimes are disconnected by dimensional barriers, which means to be parallel they have to be across a higher dimensional space which is the neutral zone. Which is why it looks finite, but its actually not, and like I said, it doesn't matter whats shown here because we dont see any of the other realms at all lmao, so its clearly not 100 percent accurate to what the macrocosm looks like.No they wouldn't? It's just a dimensional wall, we can literally see into them. The fact we can see into them, and the inside is blatantly finite, well sucks ig. And what does it being a higher-D wall matter? It can still be finite in scale, that's what the "space" part entails.
This argument doesn't even make sense, in what world would they look finite from a neutral zone? By that logic everything should look non-literal in said zone, yet we know that isn't the case.
We know that because its not shown, its a different spacetime, the afterlife is literally bigger than the living universe, prove its just, "not visible", wheres the kaioshin realm or hell?And how would we know? That shit may as well be non-visible. And hell, you said yourself, it varies all the time, why take any of that literally as opposed to the actual time we see them?
This is the single time, ever, we ACTUALLY see what they look like, all this other variable showings? Maps? Whis or whoever yapping? That's the artistic representation. This is just straight-up what they look like.
You are literally arguing that they're not literal, yet everything in said scene happens in real time, is drawn literally, but just what contradicts the CRT isn't?
Clearly not.In fact, this is the edge of just a single galaxy,
Neutral Zone.see other galaxies shining in the background
Zen-Oh's Palace.No its literally not, we know the universe doesn't actually look like how its conveyed, it varies throughout the series.
A higher dimension is gonna make an infinite sized structure in a lower dimension appear finite. You can use this same example for a line and a 2D graph. A line is comprised of an infinite amount of point, but it’ll look finite on a graph. The same logic applies here, if we’re getting a higher dimensional perspective, then obviously it’ll appear finite. You’re arguing with basic dimensionality concepts.Dude, this is the SINGLE time it is quite literally shown. It isn't a map, some dude yapping, an artistic representation, it is literally the universe shown directly.
No they wouldn't? It's just a dimensional wall, we can literally see into them. The fact we can see into them, and the inside is blatantly finite, well sucks ig. And what does it being a higher-D wall matter? It can still be finite in scale, that's what the "space" part entails.
This argument doesn't even make sense, in what world would they look finite from a neutral zone? By that logic everything should look non-literal in said zone, yet we know that isn't the case.
And how would we know? That shit may as well be non-visible. And hell, you said yourself, it varies all the time, why take any of that literally as opposed to the actual time we see them?
This is the single time, ever, we ACTUALLY see what they look like, all this other variable showings? Maps? Whis or whoever yapping? That's the artistic representation. This is just straight-up what they look like.
You are literally arguing that they're not literal, yet everything in said scene happens in real time, is drawn literally, but just what contradicts the CRT isn't?
The part about counterargument (yes, a singular counterargument) is funny, at least.
Comprised of とんでもない, or an "unthinkable; unexpected; absurd; outrageous; preposterous; terrible" number of galaxies. Unquantifiable.
Because the number of galaxies is as vast as Jaco claims, travelling to the center of the universe is infeasible.
Why does this need to be spelled out to understand?
Jaco never discredited her knowing of the edge and the center of the universe, he only shot down her desire to explore said regions of space.
The television series provides a visual of said edge and center of the universe.
And what Jaco co-signs.
Never implied.
Not that the place is non-existent, though.
Could you point out the translation errors and the true translation? If there are genuine translation errors, we would want to fix that.If no one is going to point out any translation errors then I'm inclined to agree with this. Since the Neutral Space is treated as 5-D, it makes sense that the universes are depicted as finite visually since we're observing it from a 4-D spatial perspective.
What exactly is there to talk about?You gonna mention the official site statement about what Jaco thought?
In fact, it is not the center of the Universe, but the center of just one galaxy, it is refuted by Jacob who has knowledge about the Universe, there is no centerClearly not.
The visual accompanies Bulma's explanation of her plans to reach the center of the universe, and there are other galaxies inside the construct we're both looking at.
There is a cluster of them towards the center.
What you mentioned doesn't make sense, you are refuted by the anime itself which shows that the neutral zone has a different color than spaceNeutral Zone.
C'mon, I thought you were an expert on this kind of stuff; you should know better.
Sucks to suck I guessIn truth no.
If it were literally like this, universe 7 would be 3-A and not 2-C as we see.
It literally isn't, it's the single time it isn't a visual representation.This visual representation is from universe 7, which has the living universe, the other world and the world of kaioshins that is outside the main macrosm.
Dude, it's straight up a zoomed out shotWe basically see ourselves from a higher dimensional perspective, as each universe is basically a multiverse and everything we see in visual representation is a normal universe.
This isn't even true?If we see ourselves from a higher dimensional perspective, we would not see the three-dimensional size of the space of the universe from the outside.
alive.
Dude, we can literally see the very 3D light from shenron shine in real time.A finite four-dimensional box can fit infinite 3-D space inside it, and we wouldn't see that infinite from a higher perspective, only the finite box.
Yeah in maps, yapping, etc, this is the sole time we ACTUALLY see them. the rest don't matter.And the universes have been shown multiple times, sometimes they are different, but based on how we know all the different realms look, it means that what we are shown isnt what the actual universe looks like.
And we can see that dimensional barriers are but translucent walls. Neutral Zone quite literally effects nothing.Buddy we literally know that parallel universes are separated by a higher dimensional space, the spacetimes are disconnected by dimensional barriers, which means to be parallel they have to be across a higher dimensional space which is the neutral zone.
It is the single time we actually see it. The single, lone, time were the universe is not subject to abstraction. It should be the main frame of reference dude.Which is why it looks finite, but its actually not, and like I said, it doesn't matter whats shown here because we dont see any of the other realms at all lmao, so its clearly not 100 percent accurate to what the macrocosm looks like.
Pocket realities my dude. This should be fairly obvious, given, ya know, DBZ is chock full of them?We know that because its not shown, its a different spacetime, the afterlife is literally bigger than the living universe, prove its just, "not visible", wheres the kaioshin realm or hell?
Well, I wouldn't know entirely but this is the translation that particularly bothers me:Could you point out the translation errors and the true translation? If there are genuine translation errors, we would want to fix that.
Dude, we can see the goddamn galaxies in it, all it is, is a universe contained in a dimensional wallA higher dimension is gonna make an infinite sized structure in a lower dimension appear finite. You can use this same example for a line and a 2D graph. A line is comprised of an infinite amount of point, but it’ll look finite on a graph. The same logic applies here, if we’re getting a higher dimensional perspective, then obviously it’ll appear finite.
Which evidently heed not apply.You’re arguing with basic dimensionality concepts.
Just in one ear and out the other, huh?In fact, it is not the center of the Universe, but the center of just one galaxy, it is refuted by Jacob who has knowledge about the Universe, there is no center
Weird.What you mentioned doesn't make sense, you are refuted by the anime itself which shows that the neutral zone has a different color than space
Supermassive galaxy with a slew of smaller galaxies arounds it (so by default we know the big center one aint normal).I'm not really care at this point, but if we seriously using visual as counter argument, then we should accept universe being 3-C because the sphere that depicted the universe contain only 1 galaxy, we can't just use thing we like and discard other aspects we don't like
The rest do matter because its clearly shown what we see is purely visual. The neutral zone effects everything because it literally keeps them separate, via being higher dimensional which is what ALL universe separation comes down to.Yeah in maps, yapping, etc, this is the sole time we ACTUALLY see them. the rest don't matter.
They aren't translucent walls, the barriers are literally the fabric of space and time which we do NOT see. We only "see" it when characters break reality which doesn't even appear as a barrier visually just break space pretty much. And again, its clearly not accurate because we don't see the other realms. So its not accurate.And we can see that dimensional barriers are but translucent walls. Neutral Zone quite literally effects nothing.
Its you who needs to give evidence that it IS actually accurate by showing us where all the other realms are lmfao, spacetime barriers aren't "translucent walls".It is the single time we actually see it. The single, lone, time were the universe is not subject to abstraction. It should be the main frame of reference dude.
"we dont see a miniscule transparent wall here or there in the even bigger translucent space-time wall", so? We're talking about universe sized shit, I pray we can't actually see it
And, this is also just conjecture, I don't want mental gymnastics based on assumptions which in and of itself is just us making assumptions based on arbitrary standards, I want tangible evidence.
Except the realms aren't pocket realities, they are full on universe sized spacetimes, including the kaioshin realms, so if we don't see the afterlife which is literally bigger than the living realm, why is a sphere with one big galaxy shown on it accurate? Its not. And again, the universes appearing finite literally doesn't matter since its from the neutral space, and universal separation always is separate higher dimensions, a 5th axis.Pocket realities my dude. This should be fairly obvious, given, ya know, DBZ is chock full of them?
And prove it? How? "yeah we cant see the microscopic demon realm or kaioshin realm so guess that must not be what the universe actually looks like".
Is this actually your argument "abstractions look different and we dont see alt dimensions (that we wouldnt even be able to tell anyway if they all superimposed in the same space-time bubble) so us straight up seeing the universes must be an abstraction and we should take the actual abstractions as evidence"?
Just to be clear, are you contesting the Neutral Space being higher dimensional in the first place?And we can see that dimensional barriers are but translucent walls. Neutral Zone quite literally effects nothing.
No not really it wouldn’t even be consistent to say that the universe looks exactly like that. As it’s contradicted in the actual show.Dude, this is the SINGLE time it is quite literally shown. It isn't a map, some dude yapping, an artistic representation, it is literally the universe shown directly.
It would be impossible to LITERALLY have two infinity’s on screen at the same time so some artistic liberties have to be taken when showing them off. The scene not only has to show us the universes but the neutral zone. So it’s going to look finite even though it’s not.No they wouldn't? It's just a dimensional wall, we can literally see into them. The fact we can see into them, and the inside is blatantly finite, well sucks ig. And what does it being a higher-D wall matter? It can still be finite in scale, that's what the "space" part entails.
Bulma doesn't even know what she's saying, even her own speech is refuted by sheillong himselfJust in one ear and out the other, huh?
Man, what a stupid thing to say, anyway; that it's just the center of one galaxy... with an innumerable additional galaxies at its core.
Must be one of those nebula the Daizenshuu was talking about.
Space color
There's a map of the DB macrocosm and we can literally see the Snake Way with the naked eye. If we're taking the visual depiction literally for everything, then the universes in DB would be smaller than our solar system, lol.
Jaco's explanation confirmed the existence of a center of the universe, only clarifying that reaching the center is unfeasible due to the distance.Jaco's explanation is worth more than Bulma's own lack of knowledge about the Universe.
No, he says that it is impossible and that there is no such thing, there are countless other galaxies like this, there is no, there is no way, these are his words.Jaco's explanation confirmed the existence of a center of the universe, only clarifying that reaching the center is unfeasible due to the distance.
It really doesn't, if anything, it proves bulma just doesn't know what shes talking about, even jaco said she cant fathom how big the milky way is, let alone the universe. Jaco doesn't confirm it exist, him saying theres no way to get there doesn't mean there is one, especially since if you want to get technical, there really is not center of the universe anyway. And bulma wouldn't know that either.Jaco's explanation confirmed the existence of a center of the universe, only clarifying that reaching the center is unfeasible due to the distance.
if you think that this a literal representations, then the universe, accepted as 2-C(aka 3 space times) wouldn't make sense, you can't zoom out of space times and see them physicallyDude, this is the SINGLE time it is quite literally shown. It isn't a map, some dude yapping, an artistic representation, it is literally the universe shown directly.
No. It'd be fundamentally incompatible as we accept a shared cosmology. Can't have your cake and eat it too.Wait. Even if super shenron feat made it not an infinite universe, there is enough evidence to apply it to toei verse, right?