- 43
- 1
Something in the vs battle wiki has caught my attention, and it's the fact that Infinite speed and inaccessible speed are regarded as one and the same, which I consider to be logically flawed.
There should be a fairly pronounced distinction between the two as the difference between one and the other seems big enough to make it its own speed tier independent from the other and not one and the same. Since 0 overwrites infinity, it would be regarded as an inaccessible cardinal, doesn't matter how many 0's you stack on top of eachother, you will never get any numerical value beyond Zero, same happens with multiplication, and in scientific notation if we were to for example: 1.23x10^0. You would obviously see that all numbers are canceled and reduced to 0. Same would happen if you multiplied infinity by 0, it still would produce 0.
It is an inaccessible cardinal.
So going back to speed, the distinction using the speed formula would be so simple as saying:
Infinity speed = infinite distance/time
Inaccessible speed = any distance/0 time
An infinite speed being still needs a time frame to travers and infinite distance, though this might not be the case or give the illusion of not being the case if you put an infinite speed being traversing a finite space.
The being that has inaccessible speed still holds an advantage that is beyond infinite on top of the infinite speed one.
If we put the in an infinite space, the inaccessible speed being would travers the distance in 0 every time, while the infinite speed being would still require a timeframe to complete the race.
This proves that there is a clear distinction, it wouldn't matter if the infinite speed being were to complete the race in 0.0000000000000000000000000000000001 of a second, it would still take him time to do so, as opposed to someone who has inaccesible speed who will always be infinitelly faster, since there is no number that is right before Zero, it's just an inaccessible cardinal.
So for these reasons I consider that, the distinction between the two speed tiers should be specified and inaccessible speed should be accepted as a spees tier, thank for your time.
There should be a fairly pronounced distinction between the two as the difference between one and the other seems big enough to make it its own speed tier independent from the other and not one and the same. Since 0 overwrites infinity, it would be regarded as an inaccessible cardinal, doesn't matter how many 0's you stack on top of eachother, you will never get any numerical value beyond Zero, same happens with multiplication, and in scientific notation if we were to for example: 1.23x10^0. You would obviously see that all numbers are canceled and reduced to 0. Same would happen if you multiplied infinity by 0, it still would produce 0.
It is an inaccessible cardinal.
So going back to speed, the distinction using the speed formula would be so simple as saying:
Infinity speed = infinite distance/time
Inaccessible speed = any distance/0 time
An infinite speed being still needs a time frame to travers and infinite distance, though this might not be the case or give the illusion of not being the case if you put an infinite speed being traversing a finite space.
The being that has inaccessible speed still holds an advantage that is beyond infinite on top of the infinite speed one.
If we put the in an infinite space, the inaccessible speed being would travers the distance in 0 every time, while the infinite speed being would still require a timeframe to complete the race.
This proves that there is a clear distinction, it wouldn't matter if the infinite speed being were to complete the race in 0.0000000000000000000000000000000001 of a second, it would still take him time to do so, as opposed to someone who has inaccesible speed who will always be infinitelly faster, since there is no number that is right before Zero, it's just an inaccessible cardinal.
So for these reasons I consider that, the distinction between the two speed tiers should be specified and inaccessible speed should be accepted as a spees tier, thank for your time.