• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

If there's an ability that's distinct and overpowered in comparison to humans, but not to a group of things, should it be on a profile?

3,615
1,922
FYI, I'm trying to follow an unwritten rule. But I'm having trouble due to grey areas in logic.

Examples: All IRL organisms are immune to hacking and EMPs, but that's nigh irrelevent and shouldn't be on profile. And we also have IRL invertabrates resistant/immune to bone manipulation.

We also have animals that have weaker abilities than people that still have their powers because they're distinct and different than people. Like animals with weaker bites and not very sharp teeth still having bodily weaponry due to low surface area. And small size is a superpower that can be added.

So what about cases like IRL tools? They're immune to life and death-based abilities since they're inanimate. That immunity can be argued to not be on there like organisms' immunity to EMPs and hacking. What about abilities like small size, inorganic physiology and self-sustenance to IRL weapon profiles?
 
Back
Top