• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Hyperdimension Neptunia High Outer Scan?

Status
Not open for further replies.
the dimensional coordinate thing are just talking about alternate dimensions iirc
No they're not, did you even read the scans I linked?
Nepgear: I said this before, but that number stands for Zero Dimension's coordinates within multidimensional space.
They're the coordinates for where a dimension resides within a larger space that contains all the other dimensions
 
unknown.png

the scans in rebirth are talking about altnernate dimensions bro
 
unknown.png

the scans in rebirth are talking about altnernate dimensions bro
1. That isn't even from the Re;Birth trilogy, that's from the Super Neptunia RPG page so try again lol
2. "Infinite dimensions" is not referring to numerical or spatial dimensions, it's referring to universes. There's a very clear differentiation between the "Dimensions" of the series, aka the universes (Hyper Dimension, Super Dimension, Ultra Dimension, so on and so forth) and the "dimensions" of the space they are all confined in.
 
1. That isn't even from the Re;Birth trilogy, that's from the Super Neptunia RPG page so try again lol
but why does that matter tho??
2. "Infinite dimensions" is not referring to numerical or spatial dimensions, it's referring to universes. There's a very clear differentiation between the "Dimensions" of the series, aka the universes (Hyper Dimension, Super Dimension, Ultra Dimension, so on and so forth) and the "dimensions" of the space they are all confined in
ohhhhh ok
 
If you really want a debunk:

There is no proof in this statement that numerical dimensions are qualitatively superior to one another, which is the basis for higher-dimensionality. The term "transcended the concept of numerical dimensions" is vague and meaningless when there is no proof they are superior to each other. Basically: We aren't giving them High 1-A for existing here because it's vague and meaningless.
Flowery language
 
i thought numerical dimensions would include all cardinals or som shit. correct me if im wrong plz
No, we don't assume that, also cardinal is about set of infinity and infinity is not a number. Lastly if including all cardinal then it is well several layers above baseline tier 0, let alone High 1-A
 
coz 5 is bigger than 4, 6 is bigger than 5 and so on
This.... is not.... how it works.... in this context...

In tier 1 shittery, you need to prove that a dimension in question is qualitatively higher than the regular 3D space, that's why if someone said that a plane is 5D without context, it's not enough for it to be a 5D structure, you need more proofs that this space is indeed qualitatively superior than the regular 3D space
 
This.... is not.... how it works.... in this context...

In tier 1 shittery, you need to prove that a dimension in question is qualitatively higher than the regular 3D space, that's why if someone said that a plane is 5D without context, it's not enough for it to be a 5D structure, you need more proofs that this space is indeed qualitatively superior than the regular 3D space
If it is stated 5D and nothing contradicts it that’s enough to say it’s 5D and 5D is inherently above 3D
 
If it is stated 5D and nothing contradicts it that’s enough to say it’s 5D and 5D is inherently above 3D
No, that's not how it works and that has never been how it works. You want 5D? Prove 5D. You want 100D? Prove 100D.

I'm gonna ask for this thread to get closed because OP is already bunk.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top