Hans Moleman regeneration removal

[DxGenesis]

I feel like there's something more important I should be working on instead

Okay, so, this is very brief, this guy has Low-High regeneration based on coming back from being eaten by roombas. The problem is it happens offscreen, and as such, it is an invalid feat and the ability should be removed from his profile. Immortality type 3 and resurrection should also be removed because they either have no justifications or are based on the same feat. That's all.

 

[GyroNutz]

I dunno, he shows up minutes later fully "regenerated". There's not really another explanation for it, and iirc we accept off-screen regen for characters who come back in short time periods without other feasible ways of coming back. Resurrection should go though if there's no other justification for it.

 

[DxGenesis]

and iirc we accept off-screen regen for characters who come back in short time periods without other feasible ways of coming back.

You do? Well, I trust your judgement.

 

[Thelastmlg]

Yeah we do, mostly those cartoons that get burned in one scene than are healed when they appear again

 

[Imaginym]

I dunno, he shows up minutes later fully "regenerated". There's not really another explanation for it, and iirc we accept off-screen regen for characters who come back in short time periods without other feasible ways of coming back. Resurrection should go though if there's no other justification for it.

As opposed to assuming "negative continuity"?

 

[DxGenesis]

I was pretty sure it didn't work that way but the thread where it was discussed is kind of a mess and I didn't participate on it. So I'm willing to believe it was a misunderstanding from my part.

 

[Imaginym]

I was pretty sure it didn't work that way but the thread where it was discussed is kind of a mess and I didn't participate on it. So I'm willing to believe it was a misunderstanding from my part.

Forgive my asking, please, but didn't work which way?

 

[DxGenesis]

Work in the way Gyro says.

 

[GyroNutz]

As opposed to assuming "negative continuity"?

I don't get what you mean

 

[Imaginym]

I don't get what you mean

Negative continuity. Presuming that since the show continues on as if it didn't happen, it in fact, is not a canonical event, despite its depiction.
Similar to how episodes of some shows like Family Guy or Unikitty may end in one way, then it's back to status quo the next episode, among other tropes.