- 4,299
- 2,800
Just gonna preface this as I saw this thread and know nothing on either D&D and Bloodborne, so I'll be basing this off the argument I've seen brought up.
I agree with Bambu that simply out-ranging Vitreous Drinker is a valid win-con, since bullet spamming should eventually kill even with the durability difference, and this is easier since Drinker has a ton of eyes, so internal damage is inevitable. And no, Type 2 isn't invincible, and it depends on how potent it is.
For speed equalization standards, the page specifically notes:
"The combat speed of that faster character is assumed to be equalized to the combat speed of the slower character. Every other speed the faster character has is reduced by the same multiplier. This includes the speed of any attacks, projectiles, reactions, perception, flight etc."
From the way it emphasizes multiplier, it can be assumed that only combat speed is directly equalized, with every other form of speed being reduced proportionally by how much the faster character was nerfed, i.e. the multiplier in which there combat speed was reduced. From the wording, Drinker should have massively faster movements. It should probably be noted that speed equalization includes movement speed in this match, since I think its stupid that it doesn't naturally.
The Hunter should easily be able to sneak on Drinker by sniping the crows and moving behind, considering the image of Drinker itself has them wearing a massive cloak behind them, so their vision isn't even omnidirectional naturally if you wanted to argue it. Prep time for The Hunter should also count if the Drinker really does just not prefer to go into CQC and watches the opponent for days.
And one more thing: Can you two stop this childish squabbling for 5 seconds? I don't care who started it, I don't care that you two have a history, I don't care if Weekly got things wrong, stop acting like two third-graders. I'd assume your both adults, so start acting like you matured in life. The sheer spite for each other you two radiate is confounding.
Drinker fra btw, I do not believe this is a stomp (it's very close to one however).
I agree with Bambu that simply out-ranging Vitreous Drinker is a valid win-con, since bullet spamming should eventually kill even with the durability difference, and this is easier since Drinker has a ton of eyes, so internal damage is inevitable. And no, Type 2 isn't invincible, and it depends on how potent it is.
For speed equalization standards, the page specifically notes:
"The combat speed of that faster character is assumed to be equalized to the combat speed of the slower character. Every other speed the faster character has is reduced by the same multiplier. This includes the speed of any attacks, projectiles, reactions, perception, flight etc."
From the way it emphasizes multiplier, it can be assumed that only combat speed is directly equalized, with every other form of speed being reduced proportionally by how much the faster character was nerfed, i.e. the multiplier in which there combat speed was reduced. From the wording, Drinker should have massively faster movements. It should probably be noted that speed equalization includes movement speed in this match, since I think its stupid that it doesn't naturally.
The Hunter should easily be able to sneak on Drinker by sniping the crows and moving behind, considering the image of Drinker itself has them wearing a massive cloak behind them, so their vision isn't even omnidirectional naturally if you wanted to argue it. Prep time for The Hunter should also count if the Drinker really does just not prefer to go into CQC and watches the opponent for days.
And one more thing: Can you two stop this childish squabbling for 5 seconds? I don't care who started it, I don't care that you two have a history, I don't care if Weekly got things wrong, stop acting like two third-graders. I'd assume your both adults, so start acting like you matured in life. The sheer spite for each other you two radiate is confounding.
Drinker fra btw, I do not believe this is a stomp (it's very close to one however).