- 5,717
- 3,243
"They moved into non existance".Shake - tremble or vibrate
Vibrate - move or cause to move continuously and rapidly to and fro.
This blanent proof, like I said, debunk the English language, they moved non existence.
No buddy, they didn't. They didn't directly shown harm/interact with it (touch It, manipulate, warp it), in fact, you have to prove if they even would be able to touch nothingness. And shaking something isn't any kind of harm.
Show me a Ki blast of Jiren making contact with the WoV. Show me any of his punches making contact with the WoV.
Again, you are using the burden proof fallacy, but It won't work.
They can still use their Hax buddy, and changing color isn't any kind of harm, like would be destroying it, manipulate it, or outright erase it.If you warp someone in the physical realm, can they still move around and act normally without other powers? No, why would it be different for people with nep.
No, I didn't, what are you talking about??.The point is you're trying to say since goku and jiren didn't do anything later. But hakai itself was shown not affecting the environment. You're logic would mean anyone who blew up a universe for example, that launched an attack that didn't blow up a city. Would not be universal and its contradiction, you need to be logically consistent.
Hakai energy didn't directly shown warping the environment with it's aura, untill Toppo had the brilliant idea to lounch it at the void. In which we could see how the Hakai energy warped the sky.
And you too have to be logically consistent, becouse cases like when SSG Goku and Beerus were going to fight serious (well at least Goku) they went up on the space, becouse they knew that the Earth wouldn't handle for much long their battle. And also, their punches were going to destroy the universe, can you prove there that they were using their Ki control at it's max?.
And can you prove Jiren was?..., was it even stated that he was controling and holding back himself???You never proved he was not controlling his ki. Actually address this, it was never stated. The burden of proof is on you.
Last edited: