• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

God of War: Ragnarok Discussion Thread

Also, why doesn't Kratos have resurrection? He, after dying to Zeus, was able to be resurrected and even gets a trophy that he was resurrected, It's also similar to God Of War 1, where Kratos was impaled by a giant stone from Ares, and was able to regenerate your body (God Of War 2 proves this)
 
LuffyRuffy46307 said:
Also, why doesn't Kratos have resurrection? He, after dying to Zeus, was able to be resurrected and even gets a trophy that he was resurrected, It's also similar to God Of War 1, where Kratos was impaled by a giant stone from Ares, and was able to regenerate your body (God Of War 2 proves this)
Click to expand...
Gaia revived him.
 
Eseseso said:
Doesn't seem like Dante losing Low 1-C is gonna pass through, and Fuji's antagonistic behavior isn't helping their case.
Click to expand...
Fuji is generally like this, but right now everyone is waiting for the staff's decision on Tier 1 standards. And yes, there will be no more tier 1 nonsense like "infinitely larger than an infinite universe" or "being infinitely larger than 2-A and seeing it as a small piece".
 
Georredannea15 said:
Fuji is generally like this, but right now everyone is waiting for the staff's decision on Tier 1 standards. And yes, there will be no more tier 1 nonsense like "infinitely larger than an infinite universe" or "being infinitely larger than 2-A and seeing it as a small piece".
Click to expand...
I have no beef with KH, but they kinda got lucky with the Ocean Between being infinitely larger than the universes within it.

They'd still be Low 1-C without it thanks to time-axis dimension stuff, but still.
 
Eseseso said:
I have no beef with KH, but they kinda got lucky with the Ocean Between being infinitely larger than the universes within it.
Click to expand...
That's where things like "being infinitely larger than universes(or whatever)" won't cut it.
Eseseso said:
They'd still be Low 1-C without it thanks to time-axis dimension stuff, but still.
Click to expand...
I guess they would have been 5-D then. Of course, how true this "extra temporal axis" thing is is a matter of debate.
 
Fixxed said:
What is that exactly? Is that nothing or something?
Click to expand...
Well, i argue in the past yggdrasil has at least NEP 1 characteristic due to Voids and formless statement. Also RBR created due to existence of it branches ?
 
Last edited:
Andika_CL_atmadja said:
imo in next GoW, SMS should take inspiration from modelling/animations software when it comes to hax and abilities.
Click to expand...
maybe this is too abstract but just think it's like canvas for creating any logical/illogical construction and super advanced causality/acasuality manipulation. For example : "able to constrain anything to "NULL Object" " <<< this is just very basic example.
 
Last edited:
Andika_CL_atmadja said:
maybe this is too abstract but just think it's like canvas for creating any logical/illogical construction and super advanced causality/acasuality manipulation. For example : "able to constrain anything to "NULL Object" " <<< this is just very basic example.

fun fact : GoW 2018 and ragnarok created using Maya and other software similar like that.

284299b6b85d342ee2af903a259e1831d46d5cf0.jpeg

Maya%202020.jpg
Click to expand...
As "fun" as weeb hax will be, this'll never happen lol.
 
Georredannea15 said:
Fuji is generally like this, but right now everyone is waiting for the staff's decision on Tier 1 standards. And yes, there will be no more tier 1 nonsense like "infinitely larger than an infinite universe" or "being infinitely larger than 2-A and seeing it as a small piece".
Click to expand...
Like DT say if you can show the larger structure is significantly large, you will get it, if not then no. Yeah what i see dante will not lose his low 1C rating
 
Fixxed said:
Like DT say if you can show the larger structure is significantly large, you will get it, if not then no. Yeah what i see dante will not lose his low 1C rating
Click to expand...
What DT says is "to be significantly larger" =/= to be infinitely larger than infinity, to see like a point, to see like a line, or to see like a bubble.

DT rejected all of these situations.
Well, depends on whether you can use the universes as measuring sticks for distances in the depiction or not.
Usually, you can not, because they are depicted as floating bubbles or lines or whatever which don't really depict proper size, and in that case I would say no to all of them. If you can use them in a way to measure the size of the 5D space to prove it's significantly large, then you could get somewhere. But... yeah, depicting 5D space in a way that conserves size is just pretty hard.

Space being infinite in itself doesn't matter, as space at that level is infinite in some sense anyway. You would need to be told that either specifically its 5 dimensional volume is infinite or that specifically the 5th dimensional axis (the one you add to the standard timelines) is infinite (or very large) for that to work. But I figure if you have information that specific then you wouldn't need this thread. In general, infinite could mean infinite by 3D or 4D standards, or in the sense of countably infinite times larger than a spacetime continuum, so that is just not enough.

And of course, countable x countable = countable, so infinite infinite multiverse structures do nothing to enhance 2-A.
Click to expand...
As you can see, being infinitely greater than infinity, seeing like a point, a line, or a bubble is definitely not the same as “seeing as insignificantly small.”

And yes, DT said "NO" in all of these situations. So, these situations are not Low 1-C. NOT ANYMORE.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

MrLuk2000
Atreus goes to the past to fight his dad
Replies
14
Views
735
MrLuk2000
MrLuk2000
Eseseso
The Multiverse and its Destiny...ARE MINE TO CONTROL! (Odin vs Xehanort)
Replies
1
Views
375
Eseseso
Eseseso
Mizuki67
  • Locked
The Commoner's Thread: Removal of God of War's "Type 1 Concept Manipulation"
Replies
8
Views
1K
Georredannea15
Georredannea15
Planck69
  • Locked
God of War CRT: Norse Cleanups and Changes
Replies
14
Views
2K
Planck69
Planck69
Livinmeme
9th Strongest 5-D nonsmurf (Yang Kai vs Kratos)
Replies
35
Views
2K
Livinmeme
Livinmeme
Back
Top