- 2,490
- 229
Ram already cleared that up. I'm sure It was just a misuse of words on Gargoyles part.AguilaR101 said:
Although yea it is pretty wanky otherwise aha.
EDIT: 5-1 Gil?
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Gilgamesh vs 001 (TwistedGears)
- Thread starter Sir_Ovens
- Start date
- Status
Although yea it is pretty wanky otherwise aha.
EDIT: 5-1 Gil?
- 1,673
- 289
suffer the pain of never reaching enough votes wahahaha
- 19,249
- 2,646
is it bad that i know where the face is from?
- 19,249
- 2,646
- vietnam flashback-ception*
- 63,487
- 8,486
Spongebob?
- 12,224
- 1,111
Don't hug me I'm scared .
- 2,355
- 270
One more.
The Lord will grant, hopefully.
The Lord will grant, hopefully.
- 11,444
- 1,997
@Aguila
I don't understand why Concept Erasing Ea is wanky when:
1) It's the authority that created the World, as in its concept.
2) It has shown itself to be capable of ripping apart the Reality Marble that forms the concept of the Earth and all subsets of it.
3) It's by and far away the most powerful Noble Phantasm in existence amongst traditional Heroic Spirits. The vast majority of Noble Phantasms (like Excalibur and Gáe Bolg) are Conceptual Weapons, as are the nigh-infinite weapons in the Gate of Babylon.
001's mind hax does not seem to be strong enough to affect Gil, since he laughed off 3 billion curses, each designed to make you experience every kind of depravity at once and make you sink into the depths of despair to the point of wanting to eat yourself to end it as it melts your body, mind, and soul into it. Brief exposure is enough to blacken Servants as brave and legendary as King Arthur and Hercules.
I don't understand why Concept Erasing Ea is wanky when:
1) It's the authority that created the World, as in its concept.
2) It has shown itself to be capable of ripping apart the Reality Marble that forms the concept of the Earth and all subsets of it.
3) It's by and far away the most powerful Noble Phantasm in existence amongst traditional Heroic Spirits. The vast majority of Noble Phantasms (like Excalibur and Gáe Bolg) are Conceptual Weapons, as are the nigh-infinite weapons in the Gate of Babylon.
001's mind hax does not seem to be strong enough to affect Gil, since he laughed off 3 billion curses, each designed to make you experience every kind of depravity at once and make you sink into the depths of despair to the point of wanting to eat yourself to end it as it melts your body, mind, and soul into it. Brief exposure is enough to blacken Servants as brave and legendary as King Arthur and Hercules.
- 63,487
- 8,486
Thank you Repp
- 2,490
- 229
Good guy Repp
- 1,872
- 288
@Reppu Ea just shaped the world it didn't actually create the concept. Reality Marble? That's just the World/reality that Ea as a authority can rip apart.
- 1,673
- 289
There is a difference between specifying it could create/destroy the very concept of the world/reality marbles and vaguely referencing to be able to destroy concepts.Reppuzan said:
the latter comes across as an attempt to give Ea an ability to erase the concept of whoever it hits.
regardless it still ignores conventional durability because it's using a space-time dislocation to attack the opponent and likely also hurting him with its pocket reality destroying capabilities.
- 1,872
- 288
It's just a weapon that tears apart reality/world the side effects are the laws not working because reality is rupturing and getting ripped apart. Enkidu just channeled the counter force and stiched it back together. It was even stated that that Enuma Elish lacked the sheer magnitude compared to during the Age of Gods which Enkidu could deal with. So really the Counter Force didn't have to worry to much.
Yes but it did not create the concept of the world it simply shaped it and cultivated it for life.
Also we are kind of derailing now.
Yes but it did not create the concept of the world it simply shaped it and cultivated it for life.
Also we are kind of derailing now.
- 11,444
- 1,997
@Ram
Enkidu himself is explicitly stated to be a Conceptual Weapon
"Namely, Enkidu was born as the concept of a god-forged weapon to pierce Gilgamesh's hostility and return the Chisel to the gods' own hands."
He would simply puncture the World and stitch it back together. If a wall existed in the chasm between Heaven and Earth, he existed to pierce that concept."
But yes, we're derailing.
Enkidu himself is explicitly stated to be a Conceptual Weapon
"Namely, Enkidu was born as the concept of a god-forged weapon to pierce Gilgamesh's hostility and return the Chisel to the gods' own hands."
He would simply puncture the World and stitch it back together. If a wall existed in the chasm between Heaven and Earth, he existed to pierce that concept."
But yes, we're derailing.
- 1,872
- 288
I'm not saying Ea isn't a conceptual weapon, I'm just saying it's not a conceptual eraser.
- 1,872
- 288
Because Ea is a conceptual weapon that rips apart the world/reality while Enkidu is a conceptual weapon that pierces pierces the concept of the world. They are different. Based on what I know right now there is nothing that indicates that Ea is a conceptual eraser. But it does do conceptual damage.
- 7,681
- 996
Votes Gil FRA.
- 63,487
- 8,486
A person argues in favor of a character throughout the entire thread. The following happens.Reppuzan said:
Either you count their vote, "I didn't vote lol", but don't count their vote (See your quote above)
It is considering that not everyone on this wiki votes or wants to vote even if they argue in their entire thread (Looking at Weekly), and a quick two second response saves the OP the trouble getting either of the two.
- Status
Similar threads
