- 944
- 660
It....doesn't. The literal words aren't "galactic level super destroyer" It's Galaxy Plus Super Destroyer. Galaxy is baseline, then plus means above baseline. Is it POSSIBLE that it means "causes a level of destruction so big it reaches galaxy level and beyond"? Sure. But that would need to be clarified.It says galactic level, not the same as literally a galaxy buster. If so, show me a scan of him actually destroying a galaxy, something that supports your evidence of it being an actual galaxy buster just because it was called a galactic destroyer, especially since that can also be used as a level of devastation so big that reaches galactic levels.
That makes no sense. I've never seen anything described as a "Planet plus super destroyer" not literally mean it can oneshot planets. Example here where a weapon is called a planet killer and it literally oneshots a planet. Is it possible? Sure but it's not the standard. Again, I'm simply taking it literally because that's all we're told. Is your take possible? Sure, but again, until it's contradicted, I'm going with the literal statement that fits the escalation of The Green Lantern Season 2That'd only mean he can devastate planet, not literally disappearing them, reason why some feats are interpreted like that.
My friend, it's...sort of exactly the point. The entire point of The Green Lantern Season 2 is Hal preparing for Ultrawar. It makes no narrative sense for him to go down a power level from fighting a Type Omega species if he's prepping to fight bigger threats.Not the point remotely.
If you really think that having the same density as a star means having the same mass, which is completely necessary to have a solar system level of destruction, you're completely wrong.
Solaris wasn't as big as a star, meaning he wasn't as strong as a supernova.
So, I'm not sure where we're having a disconnect.
Solaris has Solar Mass, explictly stated and Neutron level gravity, implying solar density. Again. a third statement. As for "He wasn't as strong as a supernova"....it's explictly stated his supernova was going to be the exact nova event of a red giant going nova. The comic is very clear on this. It's meant to be an actual Solar System level Supernova event.
Um, my friend? Did you not read my reply carefully? This isn't supporting evidence for Tier 3, it's supporting evidence for lower tiers and rookies. Quote mineAnd funny you mention this as support evidence, since Kyle almost suffered an hemorrhage from the effort, needing Superman to come to his aid.
What a support evidence for the Tier 3 to need help to contain a Tier 4 energy.
Not sure how you missed that..For low ends and rookies, we have the planet and star level stuff such as:
Again, low ends and rookies. I'm not sure where the disconnect is coming from.Two tier 4 and tier 5, great.
And if we go by this, there are more than enough anti feats of that
Last edited: