Yk, consistency isn't just about "He did that more than twice", but also how the feat itself occurs, if the character is supposed to be that strong, if it doesn't go against the common sense of the verse, etc.
The common sense of DC and Marvel regarding power systems is that their lowkey isn't one, and these characters can perform whatever feat necessary.
Thor's speech in Immortal Thor kinda encompasses this perfectly.
Most of the heroes do not struggle when it's time for them to rise to the occasion against Tier 2 or higher threats.
There's just as much feats and explanations as there are "anti-feats."
For the record, I don't mind the 2-C tiers. It is the insane tiers for regular superheroes of 1-A or similar that I find ridiculous, but that is a much bigger problem for our Marvel pages than for our DC pages.
Marvel heroes scale better to their hierarchy than DC ngl.
Knull, a celestial-level threat, was consistently pressed by herald tiers in the narrative.
Cómics scaling chains are bullshit, especially when people like those exist.
And when not remotely the same level as that, Tier 1 Thor and Hull aren't too far from it.
Not really.
When writing comics, it isn't "random bullshit go" all the time.
There are certain "tiers" and showcases that they (editorial) want their characters in.
Once again, not the point
Clark, and no other hero, is written to be a universe buster practically never, they always make him cap at Tier 5 or 4 when actually going all out, it's not about "They have those feats", but how consistent they're. You're literally ignoring the previous 2 pages of discussion we've had.
Hardly anybody in fiction is...
DC/Marvel are always going to focus on their narrative over what their characters can and can't destroy.
We get countless statements from authors and characters (so authors again) stating their characters will scale and perform they needed depending on the situation.
I agree with giving them "varies" but ignoring their higher scaling, which is usually get performed casually or powercliffed, is disingenuous.
And I DOUBT, not saying it's impossibles, that DB and other verses get judged by same logic, since other verses / that one only have a few (or one) author that keep(s) everything as consistent as possible, while Marvel and DC have 500 authors per year, all of them, and the most important part, they aren't consistent with not just their "older" stories, but they can't keep it even with their current ones.
You're giving Animanga too much credence.
DC and Marvel (at least) are more consistent than you give them credit for.
DBS, since it's mentioned, has one Universal feat that gets chainscaled to evb despite the 2-3 galaxy level anti-feats (more arc) later on in the series and the multiple planetary ones.
This isn't true for the anime continuity, but also you're conflating a lack of feats for anti-feats. You'd admit there's a huge difference between a character who performed a uni+ feat once and then didn't do so again VS a character who performed a uni+ feat and then is stated to be only planetary, to die from planetary attacks, to be in awe at planetary levels of energy, etc.
Very much true for the Anime community
Bleach, Naruto, One Piece, DBZ, and Super are all stellar tier based on one or two feats despite the countless other anti-feats they have.
I understand your position of you believing the anti-feats outweigh the high-end ones, but I'm just pointing that if we lowkey do it for one/two verse(s) we'd have to do it for everyone and Kratos will cap at planetary if we do.