- 2,510
- 462
NopeDidn't Jaime squire for Barristan?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
NopeDidn't Jaime squire for Barristan?
You know physical strength is one of the most important things in a sword fight, right…?It was about a sword fight, he never talked about strength.
So what ?You know physical strength is one of the most important things in a sword fight, right…?
So no, that doesn't mean that Barristan has equal strength to Arthur.Especially since GRRM said Prime Barristan was comparable to Arthur Dayne iirc, and Jaime considered Arthur stronger than him.
And Jaime said he can also beat Arthur with his speed and skill, so that proves even more what I said.and Jaime considered Arthur stronger than him
If Barristan and Arthur are equal in a sword fight, they need to be comparable in strength. Being able to beat someone stronger than you has literally nothing to do with what I’m saying.So what ?
In ASOIAF, some characters can beat other characters stronger than them.
Cool skill feat, doesn’t have anything to do with what I’m saying though.At 61 or 62 years old, Barristan killed in single combat Mero, better known as the Titan's Bastard, effortlessly, a taller, stronger, younger character, armed with a sword and who described by Jorah as a good fighter. Barristan had just a staff and no armour.
But what are you saying ? I don't really understand.Being able to beat someone stronger than you has literally nothing to do with what I’m saying.
The point I’m trying to make is that the 9-B via scaling to Maelys just seems random. If they’re 9-B for other reasons, that’s fine, but with Maelys, I don’t think anyone should scale to him but Prime Barristan and Arthur Dayne.But what are you saying ? I don't really understand.
You're talking about the tier in general ?
I literally said it’s fine if they’re 9-B for other reasons, just not via scaling to Maelys…All fighters in ASOIAF are logically in the same tier. Some are slightly stronger than others, but otherwise they are all in the same tier.
If Barristan Selmy is Wall level with his feat with Maelys, the other fighters in ASOIAF are too.
Saying that Barristan Selmy and Arthur Dayne are 9-B and the other fighters aren't doesn't make sense, because otherwise no other character would be able to block their attacks and no one could fight with them (which is wrong, because they can all fight each other in ASOIAF)
Yes I knowI literally said it’s fine if they’re 9-B for other reasons, just not via scaling to Maelys…
Why would there be a need for a feat or a statement in this case? As in real life, the characters can all fight each other, hurt each other, etc. A human being in ASOIAF would be Wall level and another Athlete level? It seems weird to meAlso “everyone scales to everyone” is not valid reasoning for scaling unless the characters actually fight each other or have statements of scaling to each other.
To be blunt, it being weird is not an argument. If Character A doesn’t fight Character B, isn’t stated to be capable of fighting Character B and never fought anyone that scales to Character B, then they simply do not scale.Why would there be a need for a feat or a statement in this case? As in real life, the characters can all fight each other, hurt each other, etc. A human being in ASOIAF would be Wall level and another Athlete level? It seems weird to me
Except that in real life the fighters are all Athlete level, there is no Wall level, and the difference between a Human level and an Athlete lvl is small, compared to that of a Wall level and an Athlete level. If a Wall level faces an Athlete level in a sword fight, the latter would end up with his arms torn off at the first clash of sword against sword, something that has never happened in ASOIAF, no one has been the victim of this, even if a 15 year old kid faced an adult who has wall level featsEvery human wouldn’t scale to every human just because it’d be weird if they didn’t.
That is incorrect, Street level is also a thing in real life. Also being the same tier =/= everyone scaling to each other for no reasonExcept that in real life the fighters are all Athlete level
This doesn’t change the fact that we don’t scale everyone to everyone without solid evidence. I never said anyone should be downgraded to Athlete level or whatever, so your argument doesn’t really mean anything.and the difference between a Human level and an Athlete lvl is small, compared to that of a Wall level and an Athlete level. If a Wall level faces an Athlete level in a sword fight, the latter would end up with his arms torn off at the first clash of sword against sword, something that has never happened in ASOIAF, no one has been the victim of this, even if a 15 year old kid faced an adult who has wall level feats
Jaime when he was 15 he crossed swords with the Smiling Knight, who himself fought with Arthur Dayne. So a 15 year old teenager is wall level, so it would make sense that any other adult fighter in ASOIAF would be wall level too right? Is this solid evidence?This doesn’t change the fact that we don’t scale everyone to everyone without solid evidence
Crossed swords in what way? Did Jaime actually contend with the Smiling Knight?Jaime when he was 15 he crossed swords with the Smiling Knight, who himself fought with Arthur Dayne. So a 15 year old teenager is wall level, so it would make sense that any other adult fighter in ASOIAF would be wall level too right? Is this solid evidence?
YesDid Jaime actually contend with the Smiling Knight?
Jaime never said "Arthur at his prime", because Arthur was already at his prime when he died.And aside from the fact that Arthur is stronger than Jaime in his prime, as admitted by Jaime himself
If A can fight B, but is overall weaker, then A simply downscales from B.how does the tiering system work in this kind of case?
I didn’t mean Arthur in his prime, I meant Jaime in his prime.Jaime never said "Arthur at his prime", because Arthur was already at his prime when he died.
Exactly what US69 said. Downscaling.But the question now is, how does the tiering system work in this kind of case?
Downscales? What does it mean ?If A can fight B, but is overall weaker, then A simply downscales from B.
Maelys has one-shot a horse with a punch, and from what I understood (because I didn't do the calc), the KE of a horse was calculated with the force needed for one-shot a character https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Horse, https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/One-Shot (something like that)Actually, now that I’m looking closer, where does the 929,450.25 joule value on Maelys’ page come from?
Ah… that 7.5x value for one-shots is only useable for versus matches, not scaling characters.Maelys has one-shot a horse with a punch, and from what I understood (because I didn't do the calc), the KE of a horse was calculated with the force needed for one-shot a character https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Horse, https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/One-Shot (something like that)
BumpWhat do you think ?
So I downgrade to 123928.7327872 joules ?Ah… that 7.5x value for one-shots is only useable for versus matches, not scaling characters.
Downscaling means that a character scales to another, but to a somewhat lower degree because they’re shown to be weaker.But otherwise what does downscaled mean?
Oh ok I see.Downscaling means that a character scales to another, but to a somewhat lower degree because they’re shown to be weaker.
For example, let’s say Character A is baseline 9-B. Character B can hold their own against Character A, but is clearly weaker. Character A would then downscale to 9-C+.
And thanks for the info btwDownscaling means that a character scales to another, but to a somewhat lower degree because they’re shown to be weaker.
For example, let’s say Character A is baseline 9-B. Character B can hold their own against Character A, but is clearly weaker. Character A would then downscale to 9-C+.
And possibly for the Lifting strength too.Oh ok I see.
A revision for the ASOIAF profiles (about the tier) is necessary in this case.