Galactic Gizoid, Master Core: ABIS + Eggman Shuffle Leftovers

[Peptocoptr27]

Bump

 

[LordGriffin1000]

I not familiar with this sonic stuff but 3-C is fine if that is our accepted multiplier and Emerl copies the FEB as a whole, it should be fine. I'm a little hesitant on 3-B (that's not to say I think it's invalid though), it's just a weird feat to me, overall though if no one puts up counter-arguments then I don't have much to say.

Finally, I think all the additions are fine with the exception of the 1 layer for the ice manipulation/status effect inducement. It really just shows that that ice is colder/more durable than the other. It's like trying to give a layer to fire that burns someone that resisted a previous fire. Without context (mainly a statement) we'd assume it's just a hotter fire, not that it's layered. Same goes for ice, at least that's how I understand it. Other than that, everything else looks alright enough.

 

[Peptocoptr27]

I not familiar with this sonic stuff but 3-C is fine if that is our accepted multiplier and Emerl copies the FEB as a whole, it should be fine. I'm a little hesitant on 3-B (that's not to say I think it's invalid though), it's just a weird feat to me, overall though if no one puts up counter-arguments then I don't have much to say.

Finally, I think all the additions are fine with the exception of the 1 layer for the ice manipulation/status effect inducement. It really just shows that that ice is colder/more durable than the other. It's like trying to give a layer to fire that burns someone that resisted a previous fire. Without context (mainly a statement) we'd assume it's just a hotter fire, not that it's layered. Same goes for ice, at least that's how I understand it. Other than that, everything else looks alright enough.

So the description for the abillity can remain the same. I just have to remove the mention of any layer and status effect inducement?

 

[LordGriffin1000]

So the description for the abillity can remain the same. I just have to remove the mention of any layer and status effect inducement?

Yes.

 

[Peptocoptr27]

Got it. We have the necessary votes, so this can be closed.

 

[Peptocoptr27]

@ShakeResounding Is there a way I can edit your power-scalling blog or are you the only one who can do it directly?

 

[ShakeResounding]

@ShakeResounding Is there a way I can edit your power-scalling blog or are you the only one who can do it directly?

Ah, I have a sandbox for it for those interested enough. However, I did you one better and applied the changes to the sandbox myself.

Not only this, I've edited Emerl's page to better reflect the hows and whys through Notes/Stat Values (as well as cleaned up the format of his page a tad). Hopefully this improves the ease of the page/verse as a whole, considering Emerl is where the shift to more cosmic levels of power for the Base cast begins. With that being said, I think this is good to close!

 

[Peptocoptr27]

Ah, I have a sandbox for it for those interested enough. However, I did you one better and applied the changes to the sandbox myself.

Not only this, I've edited Emerl's page to better reflect the hows and whys through Notes/Stat Values (as well as cleaned up the format of his page a tad). Hopefully this improves the ease of the page/verse as a whole, considering Emerl is where the shift to more cosmic levels of power for the Base cast begins. With that being said, I think this is good to close!

Thank you Shake!