• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Galactic Gizoid, Master Core: ABIS + Eggman Shuffle Leftovers

Firstly, wrong timestamp in the 2nd link.
It shows Eggman's Amy clone wielding a hammer of her own, as it should, so I assume you mean the third one.
Secondly, she & several other of the Fighters cast already got that in their pages(albeit a few still missing it). Only Metal, Bark & Eggman don't have the Weapon Steal move.
They have the move on thier profile, but no hammerspace manipulation in their P&A, right? I do remember it being there for Fang, but no one else for some reason.
Edit: Nope I was wrong. Guess this can be removed then. My bad

Also, kind of funny that the main vilains are the only ones seemingly above theft.
 
It shows Eggman's Amy clone wielding a hammer of her own, as it should, so I assume you mean the third one.
Ye mb, I meant 3rd
They have the move on thier profile, but no hammerspace manipulation in their P&A, right? I do remember it being there for Fang, but no one else for some reason.
Edit: Nope I was wrong. Guess this can be removed then. My bad

Also, kind of funny that the main vilains are the only ones seemingly above theft.
I think only Espio, & Knuckles are missing that rn.

KEK
 

This video has some info on almost every playable character in the game.

That was a fun video. The spin dash can apparantly reflect weak projectiles with its start-up. That's all I got from it.
Ye mb, I meant 3rd

I think only Espio, & Knuckles are missing that rn.

KEK
Only Espio and Honey, actually.
I agree with Fireld on this, but I thought Eggman already had duplication on his page, too.
Weren't you the one who brought up to me that he didn't? I was just as surprised as you. I checked for the third time, and nope. He doesn't. Not that duplication at least.
 
Would one of them happen to be Maverick? Cuz Mav is back now, he should be of assistance.

Also, to comment on the multipliers; I'm fine with 128x for several reasons
  • Firstly, it sticks strictly to the stated multipliers we're using for Power Cores of being a 2x multiplier (2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 = 128). No guesswork needed, and this is still technically a lowball, as the Chaos Emeralds boost exponentially rather than linearly.
  • Having all 7 Chaos Emeralds is verbatim said to grant tremendous power, being treated as a narratively trump-card.
  • Simply holding them shouldn't be enough to activate the multiplier, the character MUST know how to harness their energy for the purpose of AP increases and such.
So I don't think they break any guidelines, as the multiplier is neither reasoned nor guesstimate. And I can't recall a time this would be contradicted, exactly.
 
Would one of them happen to be Maverick? Cuz Mav is back now, he should be of assistance.

Also, to comment on the multipliers; I'm fine with 128x for several reasons
  • Firstly, it sticks strictly to the stated multipliers we're using for Power Cores of being a 2x multiplier (2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 = 128). No guesswork needed, and this is still technically a lowball, as the Chaos Emeralds boost exponentially rather than linearly.
  • Having all 7 Chaos Emeralds is verbatim said to grant tremendous power, being treated as a narratively trump-card.
  • Simply holding them shouldn't be enough to activate the multiplier, the character MUST know how to harness their energy for the purpose of AP increases and such.
So I don't think they break any guidelines, as the multiplier is neither reasoned nor guesstimate. And I can't recall a time this would be contradicted, exactly.
Just reached out to her too. Should have thought of it earlier. That's a solid breakdown. Do you agree with the other stuff in the OP as well?
 
There isn't a single move in the clone's moveset which isn't perfectly copied from the original's, regardless of which character is cloned.
Move = Ability proof? Kicking isnt an ability for example, I am also iffy on the weapons part
 
Weird hax, but Ig its fine. Though shouldnt there be a limit? Or do we assume Eggman can just copy outerversal weapons for example
 
Weird hax, but Ig its fine. Though shouldnt there be a limit? Or do we assume Eggman can just copy outerversal weapons for example
Abillities like these already have implied limits. They don't need to be directly stated on the profile. That's why the No Limits Fallacy has its own page.
 
I gave the Chaos Emeralds 1-C durabillity scaling from the death ball they tanked from The End. Everyone ok with that?
 
If the emeralds have 1-C durability, wouldn't that make Knuckles and everyone 1-C, since he shattered the master emerald...? Yeah I don't think that's gonna work.
 
That creates problems when Eggman shattered the emeralds in Battle with a hammer lol.
He did that??? Holy shit nevermind. Maybe thier durabillity varies along with thier AP, but I'm not gonna add it to the OP anymore.
If the emeralds have 1-C durability, wouldn't that make Knuckles and everyone 1-C, since he shattered the master emerald...? Yeah I don't think that's gonna work.
I specifically said that this should not aply to the Master Emerald.
 
The Emeralds are really inconsistent, you also have Gens where a single Emerald could knock back the Time Eater
I know, but this was about thier durabillity. No longer of relevance though. I removed it because it's too complex for this thread
 
Back
Top