You can still be bigger than countable infinity without being low 1-C; Like, infinity x infinity is still just regular infinity, you'd need something like infinity^infinity.
Now i think i need to jump in, where did you get the idea that you can be bigger than countable infinite without being uncountable infinite (or Low 1-C in this case), infinite x infinite = infinite and no it isn't bigger than infinite. Set theory is all of about the size of infinity, the moment you bigger than countable infinite (which is natural number or Aleph-0), you must ne uncountable infinite (which is real number or Aleph-1), no way you can be bigger than countable infinite while still being countable infinite itself, especially the word bigger is a word that describe the size of something
Can we like, not do whataboutism here for once?
So to be clear, this is low 1-C? No whataboutism here, genuine curiosity.
Technically, the correct point: infinity ^infinity... or the powerset of aleph null or countable infinite, which is aleph 1 or uncountable infinite. But, from the comparison, all infinite less than uncountable infinite would be the same size; if something infinite is finite or insignificant, to another realm, it suggests uncountable infinite or Low 1-C in this case.
Except that's not even the case here; The context is "a ray of light against endless darkness", which DOES indicate an infinite size difference, but not much else.
Idk about Touhou contexts, also iirc there is a Low 1-C upgrade thread for Toubou in the past??
There was, but the logic is different here. But seeing the context of "here's a realm that is infinite, and here's a realm that is larger than it", do you think that this is low 1-C?
Bruh honestly by continuum hypothesis there are no set of number that bigger than aleph 0 and smaller than aleph 1. So the bigger one must be aleph 1 or uncountable infinite
...So about the Low 1-C thing, there's an argument Gilver brought up concerning Low 1-C that I have noticed but seemingly no one else has been bringing up and I want to ask an important question to Gilver to answer to confirm my interpretation. But since it's a staff thread I want to confirm if I can speak up. Is that fine with you?
Then it is hard for argue if demon world have uncountable infinite size
It's a standard Low 2-C universe
When the Human world was fusing with the demon world from Argosax, it seemed an infinite space-time was created [From past thread, The World Energy is capable to warp the space-time in a Universal scale,can create time paradoxes,can affect not only the present, but also the past and future and is capable to warp the entire of the universe”]; I guess it suggests the human world could have been at least infinite regarding the ray of light quote which can support Low 1-C.
No? That doesn't meant the Human World is infinite, it was just warped spatially to be infinite. That doesn't retroactively apply to the ray of light statement. Like, this just serves to support the DW being infinite, since it fusing with the HW made a part of it infinite.
Can i comment further on this thread??
vsbattles.fandom.com
vsbattles.fandom.com
vsbattles.fandom.com
Time is not space. As far as i understand the reason of demon world be low 1C, is about higher space not higher timelineTiering System FAQ
A: Whether higher-dimensional entities qualify for such high tiers or not depends on several different factors, which may take root both in and out-of-verse. To explain this situation, we must first clarify what exactly being higher-dimensional entails. In a way, yes, though not how most would...
"Note that timelines, per default, are assumed to be infinitely long i.e. it’s assumed that there is no end to time."
Universe
The Universe is all of space and time and their contents, including planets, stars, galaxies, all forms of matter and energy. Due to the unknown spatial size of the universe, we use the size of the observable universe as a baseline for universal feats. The observable universe is currently...
It should be noted that timelines are assumed to be infinite in length
I don't want to interfere, DT denied that here. But it's still your decision.
Maybe not on its own, but with statement(s) that suggest qualitative superiority; my point was more so with it and the couple statements that could suggest qualitative superiority in DMC.
i don't looked other context or statements, but I can say that, this is not tier 1 alone.
Which statements are those, exactly?
Site standards keep changing every five minutes I look away. One verse doesn't get it despite meeting most of the requirements, another gets it no opposition from Ultima and DT while having little to no evidence. I don't keep track anymore.
No, I'm not saying that qualitative superiority isn't tier 1. I'm saying that this statement(being infinitely larger than an infinite universe or seeing an infinite universe like a small point) are not enough for qualitative superiority and Tier 1. That's why you should need a statement that reference to qualitative superiority. And don't twist my words lmao
Yes, thank you, jfc. This is what I've been saying for 3 pages.
G1 recently debunked their old arguments, so the tier 2 feats are still valid afaik
So your only argument is "people disagreed with you back when tier 1 had more evidence going for it". K. I've called Agnaa and DT here so hopefully this'll be resolved with a bit of patience.
You wouldn't catch us dead engaging in your 2hoe threads with that attitude you are showing.
To add onto this, you're obviously overlooking
Good. I rarely take pleasure in making my own verse OP just to trample over someone else. But I'll gladly make an exception here. See you in a year or so~
Stop trying to spite eachother, be civil lol
, Disagree with the CRT
