That is an assumption that needs context on why also through the ultimate guide were given context that it’s a “giving life”context along with that we are already given context that the bodies of the kids were stuffed into Freddy’s animatronics through the newspapers(common sense but alright)
The Puppet stuffed them in the suits as shown in the "Give Gifts" minigame. This is the first time that stuffing leads to possession, thus, The Puppet couldn't have known that it would work.
That wasn’t my point,the point of the matter was the way it was demonstrated and the passage way to that.LOL
What? "The way it was demonstrated"? What does that even mean? The Puppet finds the souls and throws a party for them. That's literally it. She doesn't even give them the presents.
Ok so take what I said out of context the thinking elements paired with other lines is entailments but alright,not really good arguments but you but it’s all good.
The "full context" is that the Puppet "is always thinking, and can be anywhere". Being anywhere isn't a matter of intelligence, but mobility. I'm also "always thinking". Am I Above Average for that?
Ok so imma be upfront and honest,you need to prove why that is a case in a epistemological way and how those entail to puppet,she is aware of how these others are thinking in bloodthirsty for revenge and even blindness over guards but she is somehow able to bypass this and exist on a level that’s better than them which entails to phone guys lines in fnaf 2.
She "bypasses" it because she isn't as vengeful. Plain and simple. That's not a matter of intelligence. Also, I don't need to be smart to see that the animatronics killing everything in sight are animalistic.
Ok so logically speaking if I’m able to perfect my hiding and make it so that I’m undetectable that would fall under a deductive logic of me being smart enough for that also the methods that these went are unknown and through daytime without being seen by people so these would have to be taken into consider.
Look at it this way: if you can hide in a space (a ball pit, an entire animatronic, etc.) and you just sit there all day, that isn't very impressive. I'm sure literally every inch of the pizzeria isn't being monitored 24/7, so it wouldn't be that difficult to sneak in, relatively speaking. I mean, who's going to examine every single thing in a pizzeria that is
meant to lure these animatronics in in the first place? It's not as though Michael ever searches for them inside of the building.
Prove that puppet is 7 and what even suggest that in the very first place along with that an animatronic writing when others in the series are unable to would be a superiority logically in that sense.
I didn't say that Puppet was 7. I said that a seven-year-old could do most of those things. Also, Molten Freddy (who probably has the mixed souls of the
animalistic originals) can write. Why do you think being an animatronic would make you less capable of writing?
Most of your arguments are flawed and vague and doesn’t really refute mines in the very slightest and disregard how “logic” works but alright I will leave it at that.
Most of my arguments are actually very solid. You're just stubborn and can't accept when someone else has a good point, which is why everyone has so much drama with you. You being a condescending asshole ("common sense but alright", "not really good arguments but you but it's all good") doesn't help you seem any more likable, either. Remember that we
are friends, and that I'm not opposed to the Frights at all; I just
can not composite them if everyone disagrees, regardless of how much I really want to.
