• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Fnaf at freddys discussion thread!

Skill issue + they have the same endoskeleton model + Mimic thing is literaly learn and copy, he acts diferently depending of what It's mimicing, and guess what, he was mimicing willian + what he learn as glitch trap
They have too different endos (Just check Wiki) + Mimic barely acts like William, if at all.
 
r/fivenightsatfreddys - this is not our freddy
 
Why do we assume Fazbear Frights is non canon now?
We always have, there's not really a case to be made for it being canon. If it were, that'd mean that:
  • William Afton died two contradictory deaths
  • There are two VR games (Ruin confirms there is only one)
  • Michael survived the fire
  • Baby survived the fire
  • William survived the fire (Ruin basically confirmed this isn't the case)
  • There is a brand new vengeful spirit named Andrew that was never mentioned prior the games
  • The spirit in Golden Freddy doesn't exist and is merely Andrew. Andrew is just the FF version of Cassidy/TOYSNHK
  • A mound of events that we would be hearing about (Sea Bonnies, Trash Afton, etc)
It would be an absolute mess to try and blend FF and the main timeline into one continuity. Tales from the Pizzaplex are canon (probably?), Fazbear Frights are not. The FNaF wiki doesn't consider them canon, no prominent internet theorists (FuhNaff, Matpat, Id's Fantasy, RyeToast, etc) consider them canon (and they actually read the books lol, they would know), and the general consensus is that it's a different continuity like the novel trilogy

They're described as "hints to fill in the blanks" by Scott himself
 
They have too different endos (Just check Wiki) + Mimic barely acts like William, if at all.

Click on the images for a better look

Mimic had a lot of his parts broken and replaced thanks to the blob atack but you can see they have the same left hand, and the same jaw.

also, if burn trap wasn't the mimic, how gregory would know It need to be keep locked away? if they aren't the same gregory should not even know the mimic exist
 

Click on the images for a better look

Mimic had a lot of his parts broken and replaced thanks to the blob atack but you can see they have the same left hand, and the same jaw.

also, if burn trap wasn't the mimic, how gregory would know It need to be keep locked away? if they aren't the same gregory should not even know the mimic exist
I don't know why people are so hung up on Burntrap's design. Besides that kind of thing change over time.

We have the HQ 8 page made by Gregory. Which has Burntrap and Blob, so in addition to the ending of Burntrap not being canon, we don't even know if it really exists or if it's like that.
 
So, we have entered the higher spheres of arguing.
Mimic is designed to fit every costume, and his head is pretty similiar to human head, that's why Mimic's head fits Burntrap's costume. And another, Burntrap's head is skull, so endo-head propably should be smaller.
And, like we see, Mimic is sealed outside Burntrap's "lair", he was sealed there in first epilogue from tales, long before SB.
Also Burntrap's and Mimic's behavior is not similiar, and Mimic never was described in epilogues as similiar Afton, wearing suits is not becouse of mimicing Afton, he just followed proggraming and mimiced brutality from Edwin Murray.
 
We always have, there's not really a case to be made for it being canon. If it were, that'd mean that:
  • William Afton died two contradictory deaths
Wrong. The FF books take place right aftr Fnaf 6 with the Agony stuff

Even if we ignore that the books still explain the Phantoms which would be added to the profile
  • There are two VR games (Ruin confirms there is only one)
The Jeremy one is not canon since its really really meta
  • Michael survived the fire
  • Baby survived the fire
  • William survived the fire (Ruin basically confirmed this isn't the case)
How do we know Williams dead body is still in Fnaf 6? Its never explained
  • There is a brand new vengeful spirit named Andrew that was never mentioned prior the games
  • The spirit in Golden Freddy doesn't exist and is merely Andrew. Andrew is just the FF version of Cassidy/TOYSNHK
  • A mound of events that we would be hearing about (Sea Bonnies, Trash Afton, etc)
It would be an absolute mess to try and blend FF and the main timeline into one continuity. Tales from the Pizzaplex are canon (probably?), Fazbear Frights are not. The FNaF wiki doesn't consider them canon, no prominent internet theorists (FuhNaff, Matpat, Id's Fantasy, RyeToast, etc) consider them canon (and they actually read the books lol, they would know), and the general consensus is that it's a different continuity like the novel trilogy

They're described as "hints to fill in the blanks" by Scott himself
Which would mean we should use them to understand what Afton does in the games, like it literally explains the Phantoms but you guys are saying instead of using them to explain it we should just write “possibly Illusion Creation” lol.
 
Which would mean we should use them to understand what Afton does in the games, like it literally explains the Phantoms but you guys are saying instead of using them to explain it we should just write “possibly Illusion Creation” lol.
I mean, if the games don't talk about the phantons but the books explain, I can understand using the books on this issue.

As mentioned above, Scott himself said that they can be "hints to fill in the blanks"

It's not like we don't use anything from the books at all, we talk about William Afton or Henry all the time even though they're given in the books.

And a youtuber I follow also says that he doesn't think the books are canonical (I mean before the mimic thing), but uses some of their stuff that better explains some of the game's blank spaces.

So personally I'm not totally against it.
 
I mean, if the games don't talk about the phantons but the books explain, I can understand using the books on this issue.

As mentioned above, Scott himself said that they can be "hints to fill in the blanks"

It's not like we don't use anything from the books at all, we talk about William Afton or Henry all the time even though they're given in the books.

And a youtuber I follow also says that he doesn't think the books are canonical (I mean before the mimic thing), but uses some of their stuff that better explains some of the game's blank spaces.

So personally I'm not totally against it.
Basically either we use games only and have a funky “Possibly Illusion Creation” or we use the Books and learn how they do it in depth, theres also several abilities that the characters get by simply having Remnant such as Immortality 1
 
My opinion on the entire Mimic and Afton stuff is

Glitchtrap might be Afton which we might see more in HW2 while Burntrap and other physical stuff might be Mimic
 
We always have, there's not really a case to be made for it being canon. If it were, that'd mean that:
  • William Afton died two contradictory deaths
  • There are two VR games (Ruin confirms there is only one)
  • Michael survived the fire
  • Baby survived the fire
  • William survived the fire (Ruin basically confirmed this isn't the case)
  • There is a brand new vengeful spirit named Andrew that was never mentioned prior the games
  • The spirit in Golden Freddy doesn't exist and is merely Andrew. Andrew is just the FF version of Cassidy/TOYSNHK
  • A mound of events that we would be hearing about (Sea Bonnies, Trash Afton, etc)
It would be an absolute mess to try and blend FF and the main timeline into one continuity. Tales from the Pizzaplex are canon (probably?), Fazbear Frights are not. The FNaF wiki doesn't consider them canon, no prominent internet theorists (FuhNaff, Matpat, Id's Fantasy, RyeToast, etc) consider them canon (and they actually read the books lol, they would know), and the general consensus is that it's a different continuity like the novel trilogy

They're described as "hints to fill in the blanks" by Scott himself
FF is alternative universe/timeline. It have similiarities to games universe, but is not identical or same. Like original Novels trilogy, but on larger scale.
Also Eleanor is not Baby, it's something different.
 
My opinion on the entire Mimic and Afton stuff is

Glitchtrap might be Afton which we might see more in HW2 while Burntrap and other physical stuff might be Mimic
I wish Glitchtrap was at least Afton.

I don't like him still being "alive" in a way, since it makes it seem like the whole ending of fnaf 6 was for nothing, however, I think it's even worse that all this (Glitchtrap/Burntrap and etc) is an animatronic thing that "appeared now", which he only had in the books, and which he is imitating Afton.

Glitchtrap is too good a thing in both design and execution (perhaps) to be wasted on a character I don't think anyone cares about.

Like mortal games 3, they killed John Kramer, and they kept bringing a million imitators of him with various flashbacks of him.
 
I wish Glitchtrap was at least Afton.

I don't like him still being "alive" in a way, since it makes it seem like the whole ending of fnaf 6 was for nothing, however, I think it's even worse that all this (Glitchtrap/Burntrap and etc) is an animatronic thing that "appeared now", which he only had in the books, and which he is imitating Afton.

Glitchtrap is too good a thing in both design and execution (perhaps) to be wasted on a character I don't think anyone cares about.

Like mortal games 3, they killed John Kramer, and they kept bringing a million imitators of him with various flashbacks of him.
I feel theres still hope. We still have no idea what happened to Glitchtrap so hopefully Hw2 might get down to the route of william being a side villian thats lurking in the dark which fits him very well.
 
Just came a trough to me, Mr.hugs is able to break 100 bones of a children and is literally just a vacuun cleaner with some features placed on It...

Considering that the other animatronics have a actuall way to do damage like functional arms, claws and jaws shouldn't every FNAF animatronic upscale from Mr.hugs?
 
The legitimacy of the ffps lawsuits is very doubtful. I think it was something about inconsistemcy or something like that.
Meh, I really don't see It, It's like saying that the hability of monsters in games to kill the protagonist can't be used beacuse It's didn't "cannonically" happened

Thouse lawsuits are just as cannon ends as you getting jumpscared

IDK what would be inconsitent about them trough, will give It a look
 

here are all the Lawsuits, I don't see how they are inconsistent, unles the problem is that Mr.Hugs can break the 100 bones, but this don't really a inconsistence. there is "ant feats" for Mr.hugs after all
 
The inconsistency I think is that the kid didn't notice the 100 broken bones until he got home
It's just a little joke and It's fiction, there is no reason to use It to remove the feat from beingh real

Just the fact You can lose this lawsuit should be enough to be considered areal feat (sinse they can just check if the kid is all broken or not)

Again, I don't see this beingh a problem, a feat is a feat
 
Change the topic a bit

I made a GDT for other mascot horror games overall if anyone want to give a look

 
Back
Top