- 12,669
- 9,618
There is no need for that. It can be explained under existing types.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Okay.Yes.
My apologies, but the issue, as DontTalk explained earlier, is that several of these abilities work based on very different premises. Undoing fusions, creating nuclear explosions, and cutting entities in half on a spiritual level are not really the same thing, so unless somebody can provide a very good definition of a defining mechanic, the page in question does not seem relevant to our purposes.Ant Sir, please you have to understand how this is important. This will solve a lot of issues.
Benefits
1. Further limiting texts without categories on profiles.
2. Further limiting the redundant use of "Durability Negation" in both AP section and P&A section, thus only limiting it to AP section where it is most commonly used.
I understand that a part of it is similar to duplication, but please acknoledge that splitting into unidentical parts also exist in fiction. And we can't ignore that. Have you seen my draft Sir?
That would be great, I don’t think 2 bureaucrats (not to discredit the fact they are extremely trusted, important and knowledgable members of the community) should overrule 9 other people, 3 of those staff, who either don’t have issues with the addition or outright approve it, there’s only so much extra weight you can give to certain votes (again, not to go against the importance of staff and bureaucrat opinion in discussions like these, which is always going to be of extreme importance and influence)Well, with two bureaucrats against the suggested revision and one calc group member for it, it is currently extremely unlikely to be applied, but I can send a notification request to the rest of our administrators if you want to receive further input.
My apologies, but the issue, as DontTalk explained earlier, is that several of these abilities work based on very different premises. Undoing fusions, creating nuclear explosions, and cutting entities in half on a spiritual level are not really the same thing, so unless somebody can provide a very good definition of a defining mechanic, the page in question does not seem relevant to our purposes.
Body, soul, mind, even the underlying concepts like emotions, memories and stuff.The premises all revolve around the concept of fission.
PREMISES THAT REVOLVE AROUND FISSION
- Undoing fusions -fission
- creating nuclear explosions - a mere byproduct of fission, it’s not fission itself. So this will not be a criteria of fission. Splitting atoms* will be considered instead because an atom is a fusion of its respective subatomic particles.
- Cutting entities in half - this isn’t Fissionism, it’s an AP feat. One is destroying an entity not creating a new one. Fission is only relevant to fusions, mixtures and those who can duplication. A solution to this is simply adding a note that cutting entities in half doesn’t count as fusion. Would this be okay?
- Seperating fusions of physiology - One can seperate a being of dragon, demon, human physiologies into 3 seperate entities with each physiology. Perfect.
- Seperating fusions of DNA - In a perfect scenario, separation of a fusion of other different nucleic acids will sometimes cure mutation.
- Seperating a fusion of weapons or machines - eg a user can undo Megazords
- Seperation of body, soul and/or mind - literally seperating the Mind from body, not instinctive reactions. Separating demonic soul from body to undo possession. Etc.
Solution
Add all the “” to limitations or emphasize in definition that it doesn’t count as Fissionism
All the “” added under types to give a general idea of what counts. Because they all fall under the same premise.
@AKM sama @SomebodyData @Celestial_Pegasus @Wokistan @Andytrenom @Mr._Bambu @Elizhaa @Qawsedf234 @ByAsura @Sir_Ovens @Starter_Pack @Abstractions @LordGriffin1000 @Colonel_Krukov @SamanPatou @GyroNutz
Would you be willing to help out with evaluating this thread please?
As long as breaking fusions is still part of it, it's good by me.I didn't see Confluctor respond yet so I'll tag him again and my fellow staff members as well.
@Confluctor @Emirp sumitpo @LordTracer @Planck69 @DemonGodMitchAubin @KingTempest @UchihaSlayer96 @Theglassman12
Cloning doesn't qualify for fissionism, yes.I'm fine with fissionism as a concept. As long as it's clear it's about separating aspects of something making up a whole rather than cloning.
As long as it's clear it's about separating aspects of something making up a whole rather than cloning.
Fissionism
A character's ability to separate anything into two or more parts. The user can undo fusions of objects, powers, emotions, concepts, living beings, etc. turning them into multiple units. Identical units should warrant a Duplication rating instead. Some Fission attacks negate durability.
These two are just biological and body control, for example.2. Bruno Bucciarati (the ability to open zippers in almost anything solid thus splitting the solid into its constituents. He was able to split his own body into its parts)
10. Buggy's Devil Fruit
Well actually with that vote above, 3:1 staff input, 6:1 Overall input, 9 staff have given input, can this be applied?Agree: @KLOL506 @Elizhaa (sans nuclear fission) @Confluctor @LordTracer @Andytrenom @SamanPatou (@Flashlight237 @Arnoldstone18 @Pikaman @Greatsage13th @XSOULOFCINDERX @Axxtentacle)
Disagree: @DontTalkDT @Antvasima
Don’t have an issue with: @DarkDragonMedeus
6:2 (12:2) with DDM not having an issue with the addition
some extra input needed ofc but I think this might just push through and get added
That’s fine, they are just examples I thought up with on the spot.These two are just biological and body control, for example.
Wait I realized you copied BrunoThese two are just biological and body control, for example.
This is definitely the strongest attempt at Fissionism as an ability. Where would it go? I wouldn't know.
I'm fine with fissionism as a concept. As long as it's clear it's about separating aspects of something making up a whole rather than cloning.
A lot of powers have variations in their mechanism and working but are united by the general concept. Such as mind manipulation having the possibility of being biological or metaphysical. So I don't see that point being very relevant.
That said it shouldn't be worded in a way that these seem like general abilities people with Fissionism have, but rather that they are different varieties of Fissionism that appear in fiction
Just cases like nuclear fission sound like matter manipulation and seem redundant as Fissionism.
If such redundant cases are taken care of, I am fine with Fissionism. I guess characters like Rimuru and Yuuki would be good examples of ability via Venom's ability.
Well, if somebody can write a draft in which all of the above concerns are taken into account, I suppose that it is probably fine.Seems good, as it applies to quite a lot of situations, and currently the wiki doesn't even have a solution to things like this, and even similar cases of people splitting fusions, materials etc.. end up being circumveneted by half-solutions.
We must be careful to not mistake blatant examples of matter manip, body control and duplication for this, but I think quite some characters can just split people, materials, entire locations and immaterial things via an ability that either doesn't really qualify for other powers we have or is covered by something else just because we don't have a clear answer.
I meant 'red object manipulation' in my example if you wanna get nitpicky.Vegeta
He can literally undo fusions. That is literally fission.
Bruno Bucciarati
Bruno literally splits solid and himself using a zipper. WHAT ABILITY WOULD YOU CALL THIS? There is nothing on the P&A to describe his ability on his page so a text was used instead. This problem is easily solved with "Fissionism".
Captain Atom
His ability is literally nuclear fission.
Ben 10
The Omnitrix can literally split and extract DNA from a literal hybrid made up of fused DNAs. It is the fission of biological fusion.
Ydrat people
They taught Vegeta fission
Josuke
capable of reverting mixtures back into their constituents. Like food into its ingredients.
Wonder Woman (Capable of splitting atoms with her sword)
Can perform atomic fission with her sword. What else would you call that if not fission?
Dr. Manhatten
Can literally perform atomic fission too.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of these characters perform fission.
None of the examples fulfils this definition of the power, as none of them can do all of the listed applications. In general saying 'separate anything' is hasty generalization waiting to happen.A character's ability to separate anything into two or more parts. The user can undo fusions of objects, powers, emotions, concepts, living beings, etc. turning them into multiple units.
What about Vergil?Personally I still not like it. I think it makes as much sense as having a "destruction" page.
I meant 'red object manipulation' in my example if you wanna get nitpicky.
To your examples:
Vegeta: I call it powernull of fusions.
Bruno: Zipper creation? His zippers don't simply split things apart. Their effect is more complex, like how he can make a zipper on a floor and slip inside.
Atom: Matter manipulation, as splitting atoms is a primary effect of that ability.
Ben: Biological Manipulation.
Josuke: That is actually misrepresenting his ability, which is actually to revert thing to their prior state, not to split things.
Wonder Woman: Matter manipulation.
Dr. Manhattan: Matter Manipulation, too.
Buggy: I call it body control.
By what's suggested here I can claim that I have fissionism for my ability to separate an egg into egg white, yolk and shell.
Also
None of the examples fulfils this definition of the power, as none of them can do all of the listed applications. In general saying 'separate anything' is hasty generalization waiting to happen.
Oh, Souls are conceptual in nature in DMC.Devil May Cry's Vergil, especially his Yamato, also comes to mind, which is straight up conceptual, since he separated his two halves, human and demon, to gain more power in DMC5 by stabbing himself with the Yamato. The Yamato can even separate power from heart, and restore people from being melted into with other souls, it also straight up allows changing of one's memories and even gives them a full physical body and form.
Concept Manipulation for splitting concepts I guess? Given, I'm not really sure what I'm supposed to imagine under splitting concepts. Splitting himself into a demon part and a human part would be biological manipulation, I guess.
That works perfectly for how the ability works, thanks.Concept Manipulation for splitting concepts I guess?
Nah, if anything fissionism gets the "conceptual nature" boost as it works on concepts and all that shit. Idk about ya'all but I rather have a very good explanation of the ability and how it works than let parts out.Also, counter question: Would having fissionism mean that his concept manipulation gets deleted form the page and characters who resist the blades concept splitting stuff will not have resistance to concept manipulation, but just fissionism resistance instead? And, if we do replace it, would you say Fissionism is self-explanatory enough that parts of the explanations can be left out?
And that's kinda the thing isn't it? Fissionism is so vague, we will need to retain all the explanations we currently have on the pages when adding the ability. It's questionable if it should replace the existing abilities at all and it makes the resistance situation more complicated.Nah, if anything fissionism gets the "conceptual nature" boost as it works on concepts and all that shit. Idk about ya'all but I rather have a very good explanation of the ability and how it works than let parts out.
From my PoV is like how other abilities can achieve similar results. Law hax and concept hax to mind hax people for example. If anything us, like the indexing forum we are supposed to be, should have this ability and apply it to the verses that fit the bill to what is proposed.And that's kinda the thing isn't it? Fissionism is so vague, we will need to retain all the explanations we currently have on the pages when adding the ability. It's questionable if it should replace the existing abilities at all and it makes the resistance situation more complicated.
In other words we kinda gain nothing by having such a page.
Not necessarily. From what I understand the page isn't about an ability that just splits stuff into baser components.And that's kinda the thing isn't it? Fissionism is so vague, we will need to retain all the explanations we currently have on the pages when adding the ability. It's questionable if it should replace the existing abilities at all and it makes the resistance situation more complicated.
In other words we kinda gain nothing by having such a page.
Splitting atoms is supposed to be part of this. Splitting an atom into two halfs is literally just cutting in small. Heck, anything that splits something into two halfs splits it into two self-contained objects. Cutting a hand off of someone splits it into the two self-contained objects of person and hand.Not necessarily. From what I understand the page isn't about an ability that just splits stuff into baser components.
It does it in such a say that resultant products are their own self contained objects/characters.
That example still just sounds like nullifying a fusion to me.Say for example if you split Gogeta or Vegito into Goku and Vegeta, then that would be Fissionism. Since the baser parts have their own physical form/attributes, souls, minds, identities etc. A simple type of matter separation, soul cutting and/or mind fracturing combined wouldn't achive this feat for example.
There is such a thing as being to general. As said, by that logic "red object manipulation" should be a thing because lots of characters can manipulate red objects and there even are some red objects that are somewhat hard to precisely fit into other abilities (red balloons for example). Or take sphere manipulation as an example that would be equally (in)valid.From my PoV is like how other abilities can achieve similar results. Law hax and concept hax to mind hax people for example. If anything us, like the indexing forum we are supposed to be, should have this ability and apply it to the verses that fit the bill to what is proposed.
I just woke up, and I have a ton of stuff to do today.Personally I still not like it. I think it makes as much sense as having a "destruction" page.
I meant 'red object manipulation' in my example if you wanna get nitpicky.
To your examples:
Vegeta: I call it powernull of fusions.
Bruno: Zipper creation? His zippers don't simply split things apart. Their effect is more complex, like how he can make a zipper on a floor and slip inside.
Atom: Matter manipulation, as splitting atoms is a primary effect of that ability.
Ben: Biological Manipulation.
Josuke: That is actually misrepresenting his ability, which is actually to revert thing to their prior state, not to split things.
Wonder Woman: Matter manipulation.
Dr. Manhattan: Matter Manipulation, too.
Buggy: I call it body control.
By what's suggested here I can claim that I have fissionism for my ability to separate an egg into egg white, yolk and shell.
Also
None of the examples fulfils this definition of the power, as none of them can do all of the listed applications. In general saying 'separate anything' is hasty generalization waiting to happen.
The premises all revolve around the concept of fission.
PREMISES THAT REVOLVE AROUND FISSION
- Undoing fusions -fission
- creating nuclear explosions - a mere byproduct of fission, it’s not fission itself. So this will not be a criteria of fission. Splitting atoms* will be considered instead because an atom is a fusion of its respective subatomic particles.
- Cutting entities in half - this isn’t Fissionism, it’s an AP feat. One is destroying an entity not creating a new one. Fission is only relevant to fusions. A solution to this is simply adding a note that cutting entities in half doesn’t count as fusion. Would this be okay?
- Seperating fusions of physiology - One can seperate a being of dragon, demon, human physiologies into 3 seperate entities with each physiology. Perfect.
- Seperating fusions of DNA - In a perfect scenario, separation of a fusion of other different nucleic acids will sometimes cure mutation.
- Seperating a fusion of weapons or machines - eg a user can undo Megazords
- Seperation of body, soul and/or mind, other fused entities etc - literally seperating the Mind from body, not instinctive reactions. Separating demonic soul from body to undo possession. Etc. This also includes fission of fused memories, emotions, and other concepts
Solution
Add all the “” to limitations or emphasize in definition that it doesn’t count as Fissionism
All the “” added under types to give a general idea of what counts. Because they all fall under the same premise.