- 432
- 174
@Shadow "OK, and where did I ever say it did? You're still completely missing the point. You're trying to use this example as for why we shouldn't treat the Universes as having different Space-Times... I'm trying to refute this and saying this point doesn't intel one or the other Models".
"The current model is treated as an entire timeline encompassing all 12 Universe, each Universe containing its own Space-Time Continumm." Here. "
Shadow.... This comment: "OK, and where did I ever say it did? " Is in reference to, "the model doesn't automatically prove them being separate space-times "
I never said in this comment: "The current model is treated as an entire timeline encompassing all 12 Universe, each Universe containing its own Space-Time Continumm" that it automatically proved them being separate space-times, I'm saying this is how we currently treat it, so what example does this currently model fail in - You did NOT give one.
"If the universes are sharing a timeline that goes against the notion of them being separate space-times in the first place. A timeline by default is one space-time continuum. "
How does that go against such a notion? Explain to me how it does, please. All I've heard so far is that it goes against it, without someone really explaining why.
"Where? In the OP where I said all the universes are in the same space-time. "
What? This comment was in reference to why does Zamasu becoming one with Universe 7 matter with him affecting Space-Time, instead of the whole world.
"Not inherently. For example, Bender became one with the universe but he's 3-A. And since I'm saying Universe 7 doesn't have its own space-time, that's further reason for Infinite Zamasu not being Low 2-C. "
It still has a Universal size Space-Time nevertheless, so it would still give him a Low 2-C. rating. I'm not saying, "Him saying he's becoming one in the Universe proves he's also affecting Space-Time" It's me saying, "Him saying he's becoming one in the Universe, in conjunction with him being able to affect another Time-Line through his very own existence, means that we should go with him being able to affect Space-Time, and not just affecting the matter."
"The default is that universes would be their own timelines and not share a timeline with other universes. "
Why don't we do that to any other verse? The default position should of course be we treat the Universe as having different Space-Times, it all being encompassed into one huge Time-Line, unless we have evidence to the contrary (An example of where the model fails in).
"
"The current model is treated as an entire timeline encompassing all 12 Universe, each Universe containing its own Space-Time Continumm." Here. "
Shadow.... This comment: "OK, and where did I ever say it did? " Is in reference to, "the model doesn't automatically prove them being separate space-times "
I never said in this comment: "The current model is treated as an entire timeline encompassing all 12 Universe, each Universe containing its own Space-Time Continumm" that it automatically proved them being separate space-times, I'm saying this is how we currently treat it, so what example does this currently model fail in - You did NOT give one.
"If the universes are sharing a timeline that goes against the notion of them being separate space-times in the first place. A timeline by default is one space-time continuum. "
How does that go against such a notion? Explain to me how it does, please. All I've heard so far is that it goes against it, without someone really explaining why.
"Where? In the OP where I said all the universes are in the same space-time. "
What? This comment was in reference to why does Zamasu becoming one with Universe 7 matter with him affecting Space-Time, instead of the whole world.
"Not inherently. For example, Bender became one with the universe but he's 3-A. And since I'm saying Universe 7 doesn't have its own space-time, that's further reason for Infinite Zamasu not being Low 2-C. "
It still has a Universal size Space-Time nevertheless, so it would still give him a Low 2-C. rating. I'm not saying, "Him saying he's becoming one in the Universe proves he's also affecting Space-Time" It's me saying, "Him saying he's becoming one in the Universe, in conjunction with him being able to affect another Time-Line through his very own existence, means that we should go with him being able to affect Space-Time, and not just affecting the matter."
"The default is that universes would be their own timelines and not share a timeline with other universes. "
Why don't we do that to any other verse? The default position should of course be we treat the Universe as having different Space-Times, it all being encompassed into one huge Time-Line, unless we have evidence to the contrary (An example of where the model fails in).
"