Downgrading Ben 10 because I'm bored

[StrymULTRA]

Large Size (Type 10; Contumelias are 5th dimensional beings)

This does not work because Type 10 is only for beings that are infinitely bigger than any 4D construct due to them being Higher-Dimensional.

However, they clearly aren't Multiverse sized. Yes, they mention that 3D beings cannot perceive their true form, but that's more a reference to HDE beings not being able to be fully perceived from lower beings due to them lacking the senses necessary to see those higher dimensions, than them being literally bigger than infinite timelines.

We don't give Type 9 Small Size to stuff like Mr. Game & Watch or Bill Cipher simply because they're 2D, given that they're still comparatively the same with 3D stuff in size and existence, so I don't see why Contumelias should be either.

Especially when Type 10 Large Size is objectively giving Tier 1 physicals off sheer size beyond 4D things, but it's not the case in their profile. Remove that.

 

[ByArrow]

I agree

 

[TheGreatJedi13]

feeling a bit whimsical
i may just downgrade this random fictional story out of boredom

also agree

 

[Dark_Soul20189]

Looks good, I agree.

 

[CodeCCLL]

This does not work because Type 10 is only for beings that are infinitely bigger than any 4D construct due to them being Higher-Dimensional

Not from any 4-D construct, but specifically from Low 2-C construct.

 

[StrymULTRA]

Not from any 4-D construct, but specifically from Low 2-C construct.

We go give Type 9 Large Size to 2-A sized stuff don't we?

Unless we somehow make 2-A > Low 1-C.

Regardless the Contumelia still don't have any evidence for being Universe-sized either, so I don't know why bringing this up.

 

[CodeCCLL]

We go give Type 9 Large Size to 2-A sized stuff don't we?

Unless we somehow make 2-A > Low 1-C.

Regardless the Contumelia still don't have any evidence for being Universe-sized either, so I don't know why bringing this up.

I really have no idea what you're trying to say here.

Being infinitely larger than any 4-D structure is just 5-D. Being infinitely larger than Low 2-C structure is Low 1-C (baseline level of larger structures than the conventional multiverse).

Why are you talking about 2-A?

 

[Dark_Soul20189]

I really have no idea what you're trying to say here.

Being infinitely larger than any 4-D structure is just 5-D. Being infinitely larger than Low 2-C structure is Low 1-C (baseline level of larger structures than the conventional multiverse).

Why are you talking about 2-A?

That is no longer enough sadly.

Low 1-C: Low Complex Multiverse level​

Characters or objects who can significantly affect, create and/or destroy higher-dimensional structures that are one uncountably infinite level<a href="https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Tiering_System#cite_note-2">[note 2]</a> above Low 2-C structures. In ordinary distribution, this corresponds to R^5 (5-dimensional real coordinate space).

Equivalently, this tier can be reached by affecting/creating/destroying/embodying an uncountably infinite number of universes (More specifically, as many universes as there are real numbers).

it's not "infinite larger" but rather "infinite^infinite larger

 

[StrymULTRA]

I really have no idea what you're trying to say here.

Being infinitely larger than any 4-D structure is just 5-D. Being infinitely larger than Low 2-C structure is Low 1-C (baseline level of larger structures than the conventional multiverse).

Why are you talking about 2-A?

That stuff was changed around a year ago. Simply being infinitely larger than Tier 2 things is no longer Low 1-C (thank God).

 

[Baabasaplar95]

of fource I Agree

 

[Reiner04]

Agree

 

[CodeCCLL]

it's not "infinite larger" but rather "infinite^infinite larger

By infinitely larger than Low 2-C, I mean the equivalent of uncountably infinite number of Low 2-C structures.

Simply being infinitely larger than Tier 2 things is no longer Low 1-C

This isn't 2-A either, though.

Also, didn't you use the phrase "infinitely larger than any 4-D structure" to mean that an uncountable infinite number of 4-D structures would be equivalent to a 5-D structure? Low 2-C structures already have an Infinite 4-D volume due to the space-time continuum occupying an infinite volume in the 4th dimension.

 

[TheGreatJedi13]

That is so pedantic.
Everyone here knows what he really meant when he said infinitely bigger than 4D construct by to the point of being higher dimensional

what you are arguing isn't even necessary for this CRT. do it in his wall if you want him to be "More correct"

 

[StrymULTRA]

By infinitely larger than Low 2-C, I mean the equivalent of uncountably infinite number of Low 2-C structures.

This isn't 2-A either, though.

Also, didn't you use the phrase "infinitely larger than any 4-D structure" to mean that an uncountable infinite number of 4-D structures would be equivalent to a 5-D structure? Low 2-C structures already have an Infinite 4-D volume due to the space-time continuum occupying an infinite volume in the 4th dimension.

Blud is seriously overthinking.

Of course I meant that it's Uncountable Infinitely larger, I don't have to namedrop it to make it clear, lmao.

Besides you're derailing this, so drop this talk.

 

[CodeCCLL]

That is so pedantic.
Everyone here knows what he really meant when he said infinitely bigger than 4D construct by to the point of being higher dimensional

Rest assured, not everyone understands this. The content of the questions and answers in the forum proves this. Since when is it pedantic to want to avoid misunderstandings, especially when talking about higher dimensions?

 

[StrymULTRA]

Rest assured, not everyone understands this. The content of the questions and answers in the forum proves this. Since when is it pedantic to want to avoid misunderstandings, especially when talking about higher dimensions?

Ok lil bro.

How is this relevant to this thread? How does it answer to my CRT? Is it an agreement or disagreement? Or just random derailment?

 

[CodeCCLL]

How is this relevant to this thread? How does it answer to my CRT?

I wanted to make a small correction to avoid misunderstandings, and since I've replied to a few people who have replied to me on this issue, I'm not affecting a small crt that only contains one ability. If you see this as a reportable derailment, don't hesitate to report it.

How does it answer to my CRT? Is it an agreement or disagreement?

I remember I already mentioned this in another Ben10 crt, yes this is a agreement.

 

[Lort15]

Looks simple enough, Agree!

 

[Hellformer]

Agree

 

[OrangeFR]

Agree

 

[Speedblitzer50]

Agree

 

[Lort15]

Omg the attention when it's a ben 10 downgrade

 

[TheOrangeGuy09]

Shion is out and Strym makes sudden Ben 10 downgrade, interesting

Agree anyways

 

[ABSOLUTE-ABSTRACT-KING]

First time I agree with a Ben 10 downgrade
Agree coz why not