H3110l12345I20
He/Him- 3,599
- 1,896
^^^; has been disputed here and onwards and I want confirmation by a source of staff confirming this
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thank you for your thoughts.I've seen matches where people argue that since they already faced or have seen what a character is capable of from their verse. SBA shouldn't negate this knowledge. For example, If Danny Phantom came to life in the real world, I and many others would naturally know his history and abilities because I already have watched the series. It's prior knowledge yes but it's not the same as giving a character knowledge of someone
"The characters know the direction their opponent(s) start in. Furthermore, they get knowledge of the character's appearance, equivalent to the knowledge they could have gained if they would have been allowed to briefly observe the form opponent(s) starting in using their senses of sight, hearing, smell, taste and touch (or equivalent). It's assumed that they only get the information necessary to identify the opponent(s), so abilities like Information Analysis can not be used based on this knowledge. Negative effects of the observation, such as those caused by Madness Manipulation Type 3, are assumed to not apply for this knowledge either. Aside from this, the characters have no knowledge of each other."
This section from the Standard Battle Assumptions page I believe is for characters who naturally don't have knowledge on the opponent. We give them a basic description because naturally they don't have one. But in matches I've seen with characters who do know each other do to past experiences, their knowledge is not restricted and is valid, so I don't think a character having prior knowledge on a fictional character from their verse would be considered invalid by Standard Battle Assumptions but those are just my thoughts, I don't know if this has been discussed before so this isn't a fact.