That does not evidence that.
Perhaps it do for some and perhaps it doesn't... If common sense is applied here then it should be noted that 4th dimension worlds cannot co-exist without any additional degree of freedom to separate them. It's not a rocket science anyways. What I did is reinforced it more.
Perhaps a better call would be you explaining how multiple space-times remain non-overlapping within the same dimensional brane. This is of course assuming you either are disagreeing with the idea or the provided evidence for it. Then you can leave this question.
No it doesn't, it doesn't do that in any way.
'Beyond space and time" is no different then saying it "transcends space and time". You’re asserting "it doesn’t do that in any way" but without addressing the claim being made. A realm explicitly described as operating outside the standard space-time model is, by definition, not governed by the same dimensional constraints.
Whether you personally accept "beyond space and time" as transcendence or not, you still need to explain how such a space is meaningfully comparable to an internal universal model. That's besides the fact that the entire chapter is dedicated to introducing Helfilth and his domain whose defining trait is traversing beyond time and space.
This was heavily contested in the past; I wouldn't call it "clear and unambiguous", and even if taken as true, it wouldn't be particularly important, as it would already be infinite by scaling above a timeline.
Whether this description was contested in the past is irrelevant unless you can show why the interpretation is invalid. More importantly, "already infinite by scaling above a timeline" is not the same claim I’m making. The text describes the structure by itself as endless, not merely infinite relative to something finite. This matters because relative scaling does not guarantee absolute infinite nature of the containing space. Now, as I said before in the OP, unless you wish to be inconsistent and treat infinite universe as finite then you have no other reason to not accept this idea. The author is not required to over-specify this any further for the statement to hold. This isn't some XianXia novel.
No it doesn't, that's a gross misinterpretation. It's just typical "light and darkness" stuff that is being twisted into this, beyond any sense.
A universe can't appear as a line. If anything, it's a supporting evidence at worst. It's typical for bulk to contain branes at 4th axis as we can see through Chaos Timeline.
The actual image shown, and any coherent interpretation of the metaphor go against that. So does the broader context of the series pitting the two against each other.
There is no visual panel being interpreted here and thus, the "light and darkness imagery" objection doesn’t apply. What we have is a direct narrative description about an infinite darkness within which a line of light appears and from this separation the Human World and Demon World are established. As for broader context, the only reason it even is pitted against each other is due to their opposing nature which is relevant to the plot.
Besides all this, I don't need personal opinions about some general idea here.
The man who put GoW at Low 1-C already on this site stated clearly why the infinite part is more then enough to reinforce a Low 1-C place which is no different then anything I'm arguing on this thread.