@Agnaa
"Also, notice how you've completely ditched your claim of the brain having a higher dimensionality in its vacuum state, to merely retreating to defending using the term "vacuum state"
I already said my reasoning in
The 6th comment up from here says "A brain in a calm state in essentially it's own "vacuum" state.... It's a classic example of the brains limited information structure aka the real component applying to an imaginary component, which creates well.... Never ending fractals showing all possible probability states as a direct result of laplace transformation
watch
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2y7n6jw5d0&list=PLIQsj-TfQLN3yeMHWnGrVTxM09gM8k1pZ&index=10 and
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_u18uFEoN0&list=PLIQsj-TfQLN3yeMHWnGrVTxM09gM8k1pZ&index=8
to actually understand crap"
Soooo, I didn't change points, you just ignored me and was hyperfixated on 1 thing rather then the whole point like a BOT
"A vacuum state is the lowest possible energy that space can hold. A brain never reaches that state because matter existing in a space puts that space at above the vacuum state"
There is a thing called relativity
"Your summary of special relativity was mostly fine until you said that multiple relative observers see each other as moving faster than the speed of light. This never happens in reality, time and space dilation exist to account for this."
I'm saying within a euclidian perspective, aka seeing this spacetime minowalksi as a whole as you claim we need LMFAO... It's actually the reason there is faster then light illusions with diagonal moving angles for photons
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YlpiV4suBNA
"What do you mean by an imaginary access being necessary for relativity?" "What are "imaginary dimensions" as you define them and why do they need to be considered? Again, because I'm on mobile I can't check that link just yet." .... Once again this is a result of un observance and ignorance debunking your said knowledge LMFAO, i already said "Therefor we can comfirm different relative positions = imaginary numbers", this means imaginary dimensions is a result from the illusion of space created by spacetime dialation, and even more likely looking at different relative components.
"I never said you implied a mystical connection. I said you used pseudoscience."
ahem ahem do you even know what psuedoscience means???
"I'm pretty sure it's true that you use a Fourier transform to switch between observer' perspectives, but I have no idea how you linked that to "relative positions =imaginary numbers". Could you explain that link to me?"
LOL I thought you knew ****, XD it's called a factorial function.
"That "therefore" there doesn't connect those thoughts at all. Even if I gave you that special relativity implies imaginary dimensions (which I don't grant you), that does not make quantum physics automatically apply to every fictional verse."
Once again the mere act of you thinking about it just debunked you LMFAO, saying "it doesn't apply to fictional verse" is essentially you saying that you can't even think about it but okie. Also "(which i don't grant you)" and with the mere fact i just debunked you even with simple school courses says alot about your big ego LMFAO. You clearly don't know ****
"How does that imply higher dimensions?" "A fifth dimension does not require the existence of other realities and all possible realities. You also cannot know that Star Wars is a possible reality."
It's called spacetime diagrams, which are needed for wormholes (which are comfirmed to exist in a lesser form known as quantum entanglement) but okie....
"We can envision information spaces that can't exist, and depending on what you mean by "envision" we can't even envision all possible information spaces that exist."
Not all at once, but we can access/understand all possibilities one by one, using the base maths, LMFAO how do you think we calculate quantum mechanical probabilities
"Again another personal attack claiming I have no knowledge yet you haven't shown me any facts I've stated that we're wring..."
- looks up see's bunch of math* Stop playing dumb and ignoring for no reason XD, at least i listen to you
"If you think my argument is against the rules please report me. I can link the rule violation reports thread if you need me to." It's mainly a formatting violation
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/VS_Battles_Wiki#Members "Valid reasons for contributions and power-scaling should be displayed, and if possible, calculation links for feats."
"I have given evidence against you. I have pointed out things you've said that weren't substantiated by your sources, yet you just ignored those points and went on a tirade about something else (jumping from quantum mechanics to special relativity,, two incompatible theories)."
Uuum Yeeeeeeah once again ignorance and more ignorance read up on
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AdS/CFT_correspondence and
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bekenstein_bound
Soooo, Yes they are compatible, just only at information limits like black holes, wormholes/quantum entanglements, and holographic bounds like the one presented by the minowalski spacetime diagrams.
"I've done much more than appeal to stone. I've pointed out the incorrect things you've said, and the incorrect conclusions they lead to. Yet your only response to those criticisms is vaguely calling me uninformed and accusing me of fallacies, instead of directly approaching my arguments." Because, The reasoning behind your arugments is based on arugment from ignorance, base rate fallacies, straw man fallacies and quoting out of context fallacies (ignoring and misrepresenting arugments based on your non existent "knowledge"),
"Again another personal attack claiming I have no knowledge yet you haven't shown me any facts I've stated that we're wring..."
Of Course imma be harsh if you pretend to have authority based on having knowledge when in reality you never had knowledge in the first place it's called a false authority fallacy, and is quite and egotistical jerk move down to the fundementals. Soooo, Yes i will smack you hard with a mathbooks worth of info if i need to and make fun of you if you use hypocritical, egotistical, illogical, and bias reasoning... Just sayin.
"Information dictates reality =/= we should apply our physics to every fictional universe. You're asserting otherwise without sound logic to back it up."
Ahem Ahem Then how are you thinking about the fictional verse?? The answer is there is NO way you can, unless information truly dictates reality which includes quantum entanglement and minowalski derived holographic principles.
"How am I applying ignorance and opinion here?"
- Claims Knowledge in area*
- Gets debunked with basic school courses proving no knowledge exists*
- Ignores most things that are said and apparently makes no logical connection cause of ignornce in underlying maths*
- asks where ignorance, bias, and likely opinion comes from*
LOLOLOLOL That is a hard facepalm right there
ƒñú
"Hey I do know shit about science and maths, that's pretty mean. I never claimed you don't know science or math. You know it, but you build unfounded things on top of it."
Gets debunked by basic relativity school courses, LMFAO yeeeeah that classifies as not knowing ****. And, I am being mean because using False Authority against others in debates is not ok...
It's equivelant to me being a fake doctor and messing up someones surgery and asking why others are being mean to you LOL
"We can think about Star Wars. That doesn't mean that the author wrote the story to include Quantum Mechanics."
They don't include it, but the mere idea of it is created by it in the first place soooooo.... This kinda forces a basic information connection.... Saying an author doesn't include it, is like me saying "the universe doesn't directly dictate the true speed of light, and it is only based on minor variables, therefor the speed of light doesn't exist" lmfao... It's pretty easy to see were the problem is in this type of arugment
"How is not applying quantum mechanics to Star Wars rejecting the nature of physics, math, and the human brain?"
Because, Physics, math, and the human brains biology is what allows you to think about the verse in the first place.... The idea of abstracta actually is bassically the same thing definition wise to higher dimensions and information spaces... .Sooo, We can't use abstracta and information to deny the existence of information LOL.
CONCLUSION: Eh m8 if your gonna go around pretending shit and using it against others you will get the logical and social backhand.... It's the golden social rule, treat others how you want to be treated, LMFAO you want me pretending i am an co author of star wars just to try to debunk you??? I think not LOLOLOL, sooo don't pretend you have knowledge in physics when you don't even know the basics of special relativity, and probability wavefunctions.
And, Yes i have listened to you.... AAAAND, That's the reasoning i pointed out fallacies, because i'm sorry if your gonna pretend knowledge when there is non even down to the basics, this clearly is an arugment of ignorance fallacy, which lead to many many other fallacies coming apparent, soooo when i nailed you i wanted to make these fallacies deriving from this one basic issue be noticed..... Since, Once again if your gonna claim fake shit, imma hit you with the effects this fake shit has. Since it is an honestly illogical and quite a rude way of approaching things especially when talking to others like me who actually grinded for 9+ years to understand most of this crap, just to end up having a debate be shat on by someone who doesn't even know even there fundementals.
This is why i have been an asshole to both you and asura, because your walking into an arugment essentially spouting random **** out yo ass, just because the sheer ignorance. Welcome to social life and debating boiii's....
ƒÿ£
