- 18,393
- 14,323
And I do hope you realise that I never claimed this at all. Stop being dismissive with me, you are being like that for weeks.I do hope you realize that a private discussion with a non-staff doesn't in itself resolve a revision.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And I do hope you realise that I never claimed this at all. Stop being dismissive with me, you are being like that for weeks.I do hope you realize that a private discussion with a non-staff doesn't in itself resolve a revision.
It's fine for me what the majority thinks, I offered a solution and it got rejected, not worth arguing for it.I'd rather wait to see what Dread thinks on the matter.
Well Planck is kind of right to be fair, but it's not wise to start an argument over nothing here... The majority thinks that the other one is better which is fine.And I do hope you realise that I never claimed this at all. Stop being dismissive with me, you are being like that for weeks.
Dread, you misunderstood him, he just said that regardless bob's points are valid and has been almost agreed upon, the draft still needs to be reviewed properly by staff as it concerns major changes, I also saw what plancks said but honestly it doesn't look like anything directed towards anyone but just what a staff member should be saying usually in these kinds of situations and infact after his proposal got accepted by majority he insisted on taking further advise by more staff members and specifically by you and Bob among regular user, it seems rather him respecting your opinions than anything else.And I do hope you realise that I never claimed this at all. Stop being dismissive with me, you are being like that for weeks.
Then i apologize as well.And to nip this in the bud, for what it's worth, I apologize if I make you feel targeted. I'm rather coarse with my words at times.
Sure.Then i apologize as well.
Friends?
May I know which paragraphs should be merged?That page looks disorganized as **** with the different paragraphs, some of them need to be merged.
Friends?
Cringe, but test subjects 001 is a successSure.
Happy birthday DreadIt's my birthday, no war thank you.
We should probably just rewrite it to fit what seems to be agreed upon in this thread. Here's my draft of it, you can edit it to fit better.
Or which of these options should we apply?ImmortalDread/deathhax
vsbattles.fandom.com
Done, discussed with @Bobsican privately, and it seems fine
This is just vibration manipulation at best. Heck, it just might be an attack potency and control feat, depending on context.forgive me as this is a staff thread but, if for example. Character A barks and suddenly Character B's face and internal organs inside its head was blown off with the exception of the body which was left unharmed. would that considered deah manipulation or vibration manipulation according to altered standards for death manipulation?
It's mostly just a matter of conciseness than any overt issues. The ability doesn't need to be too complicated or long in explanation, it just needs to cover the core idea of the power and its qualifier well.Planck, I do not object to your draft. However, I am uncertain about the exact issue with my draft, even though both drafts share similarities. Therefore, I was anticipating feedback to improve my draft.
Nonetheless, it is acceptable for me. You may proceed to apply your draft.
It is fine, then. I will take the feedback to heart. A bit of improvement is needed, I am nowhere perfect. I appriciate it! :3It's mostly just a matter of conciseness than any overt issues. The ability doesn't need to be too complicated or long in explanation, it just needs to cover the core idea of the power and its qualifier well.
The feat mentioned. additional context on why it might include death is because of the very delayed effect that happens after the bork was heard.This is just vibration manipulation at best. Heck, it just might be an attack potency and control feat, depending on context.
It's just Sound Manipulation. In any case, this isn't the thread for which feats do or don't qualify.
no amount of sound is capable of blasting of the head but not the body without something supernatural.It's just Sound Manipulation.
fair enough.In any case, this isn't the thread for which feats do or don't qualify.
Your message duplicated.no amount of sound is capable of blasting of the head but not the body without something supernatural.
fair enough.
OopsYour message duplicated.
To suggest a really just very minor change to this draft: I think it should say that it can possibly affect abstract forces and concepts. Just so that people don't misunderstand that to be the default assumption.We should probably just rewrite it to fit what seems to be agreed upon in this thread. Here's my draft of it, you can edit it to fit better.
Death Manipulation is the ability to directly induce death in beings, objects or even concepts via supernatural means. This can manifest as the inexplicable death of an individual, the direct cessation of biological functions, dispersal of life force and more, being able to affect anything from plant and animal life to possibly even abstract forces and concepts.
It is important to note that just causing death via other abilities or indirect means (such as soul destruction, physical damage, deconstruction etc.) in itself does not qualify for Death Manipulation unless it is specified or portrayed to be a direct inducement of death in its targets with these being aftereffects of that.
Yeah, that works.To suggest a really just very minor change to this draft: I think it should say that it can possibly affect abstract forces and concepts. Just so that people don't misunderstand that to be the default assumption.
So: