• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Instant death revision

Status
Not open for further replies.
Don't know that, although it's also weird when he has no "sense of self", yet he's still just "almost died".
For the context, a big ass rock fell on his head and he was at death's door for a few moments (but was able to come back to reality thanks to healing power)

Point is, if he had truly died or failed to heal himself, he would've lost his sense of self. Meanwhile, in the scene, he still had his consciousness keeping him from truly dying.
 
For the context, a big ass rock fell on his head and he was at death's door for a few moments (but was able to come back to reality thanks to healing power)

Point is, if he had truly died or failed to heal himself, he would've lost his sense of self. Meanwhile, in the scene, he still had his consciousness keeping him from truly dying.
I mean doesn't the scan say that he already had no sense of self as opposed to just almost losing it? Although even being almost is still hilarious since it implies that the falling of a bigger rock would seriously damage on the Yogiri's level.
 
I mean doesn't the scan say that he already had no sense of self as opposed to just almost losing it?
No, the scans say that he had "no sense of self beside his own consciousness", it means that everything else that makes his existence, beside his consciousness, weren't there anymore. Which, I mean, is logical, he was in a "dream-like" state.
Although even being almost is still hilarious since it implies that the falling of a bigger rock would seriously damage on the Yogiri's level.
Not really.

What I mean is that, obviously, if I kill you in body, mind and whatever your existence is made off, obviously your sense of self will crumble away. That's not my doing, however, it's merely how a concept linked to the physical/metaphysical component of reality should work. I think that's what CM type 3 is for? idk. Basically, if nothing remains, you can't have a "sense of self" anymore, since you're not there anymore.

What Yogiri is doing is not "destroying the parts to kill the origin" it's "destroying the origin while letting the parts alone". Exceptions exist, of course, like when he kills the arm of someone, he obviously doesn't kill the sense of self of the person, but merely the "existence" of that arm.
 
No, the scans say that he had "no sense of self beside his own consciousness", it means that everything else that makes his existence, beside his consciousness, weren't there anymore. Which, I mean, is logical, he was in a "dream-like" state.

Not really.

What I mean is that, obviously, if I kill you in body, mind and whatever your existence is made off, obviously your sense of self will crumble away. That's not my doing, however, it's merely how a concept linked to the physical/metaphysical component of reality should work. I think that's what CM type 3 is for? idk. Basically, if nothing remains, you can't have a "sense of self" anymore, since you're not there anymore.

What Yogiri is doing is not "destroying the parts to kill the origin" it's "destroying the origin while letting the parts alone". Exceptions exist, of course, like when he kills the arm of someone, he obviously doesn't kill the sense of self of the person, but merely the "existence" of that arm.
Yeah being in a "dream-like state" in a way that has no ability to feel or see anything seems like perception manipulation to me, it's the most logical way to explain why a normal rock can put a normal person in that state when falls in their head as opposed to damaging them at the conceptual level. That's not something that a normal rock could do, and we know that the same happens when someone gets killed by Yogiri since the darkness is mentioned when UEG is about to be dead as well.
 
Yeah being in a "dream-like state" in a way that has no ability to feel or see anything seems like perception manipulation to me, it's the most logical way to explain why a normal rock can put a normal person in that state when falls in their head as opposed to damaging them at the conceptual level. That's not something that a normal rock could do, and we know that the same happens when someone gets killed by Yogiri since the darkness is mentioned when UEG is about to be dead as well.
You didn't understand what I meant.

I'm not saying the rock was doing "conceptual level of damage". I just mean that, if Hanakawa's heart would've completely stopped, his sense of self and consciousness would've disappeared, and he would've been "truly dead". The difference between this and what Yogiri's is doing is that Yogiri remove the existence of something and doesn't allow it to come back.
It's striving to fulfill a human life, and that's everything to it. It neutralizes and eliminates any entity or concept that jeopardises that. Once something is removed, it's deemed unnecessary and won't come back

And yes, the same happen with UEG because it's just what people see "before dying". Like the "you see a flash of your whole life in front of your eyes before dying" thingy.
 
I just mean that, if Hanakawa's heart would've completely stopped, his sense of self and consciousness would've disappeared, and he would've been "truly dead".
If this happens to everyone death even without Yogiri’s influence then it’s already contradicted to concept imo, like if someone gets killed by a car his concept gets removed too? The difference that you described doesn’t make it conceptual either, just death hax with regeneration negation if he kills someone and they never comeback, the removal of concept is not necessary to do such thing.
 
If this happens to everyone death even without Yogiri’s influence then it’s already contradicted to concept imo, like if someone gets killed by a car his concept gets removed too? The difference that you described doesn’t make it conceptual either, just death hax with regeneration negation if he kills someone and they never comeback, the removal of concept is not necessary to do such thing.
I mean, if you kill me, you'll effectively affect/erase my mind while just affecting my body. We wouldn't give you "mind manip" because you killed me, tho. That's the same case that applies here to me.

"Removing" something from the Ultimate Ensemble World seems more prone to affect the most fundamental aspect of a being or an object. The "Existence" of something here would need to be conceptual at least.

In any case, we're already two pages in and for nothing much tbf, in any case, if we need to discuss it, it's better to be on a CRT about his change from Death Manip to EE rather than here.
 
1st Gate:
Resistance Negation: Those he kills are 3-D beings so it's natural for him to overwhelm their resistances with 1-B hax potency as opposed to negating resistances.
Disagree with Resistance Negation.

Yogiri's hax being 1-B is an invalid reason to remove it.

Yogiri killed UEG and Gorbargion with his 1st seal, they're are higher dimensional than the Celestial foundations, and using current scaling for ID, both UEG and Gorbargion are also 1-B.

The concept of death doesn't apply to UEG, due to her being a superior god, and Yogiri was able to kill her with his 1st seal.
 
Causality Manipulation: Lacking causality is acausality and not causality manipulation, considering this same justification is literally used to explain his acausality type 4 (in The End key) I think the removal is self-explanatory.
Disagree with Causality Manipulation.

It's stated multiple times in the series that Yogiri abilities function with cause and effect.
 
Have read the profile and can't find anything about him killing information of the world, and I don't remember him doing something like that as well. I guess killing nonexistence comes from him killing UEG, but her nonexistent state only appears when her physical body gets destroyed, and considering Yogiri kills her when she is still physical rather than nothingness, which is why her final moment was losing her form and falling from the sky, I believe it's better to be removed. Also even UEG's NEP state is questionable because the profile says that she lacks mind, soul, concept; does anyone have scan for this? If not then her NEP should be removed then.
Disagree with Non-Physical Interaction.

Yogiri had interacted with UEG, Luu and Alexia, they're superior gods and they don't need a physical body and they're non-existent, so using Sion as an example, when Sion teleported back to her place after seeing Yogiri, and he was able to attack her from there.

So Yogiri can know where trio goddess are, even if they are in non-existent state.

All God/Goddess have NEP 1, this was shown to us when Malna a lower tier god, got erased and died, she was then sent to the Sea of Darkness, where Malna non-existent state can't influence her former world and interact with any worlds in the Celestial foundations.
 
Immortality Negation (All Types): Killing characters with type 1 and type 2 doesn't count as immortality type 1 and type 2 negation, it's something that even normal person without any supernatural ability could do.
Disagree with Immortality Negation.

Your reason isn't that good. We know that Yogiri negated beings with his hax that have most immortality categories.
 
Regeneration Negation (Mid-Godly): Is there any scan that shows UEG can return after having not only the physical body, but also her mind and soul getting erased? If there isn't then it should be Low-Godly instead.
Disagree with Regeneration Negation Mid-Godly.

Mitsuki have an EE hax, which the ability is stated that it will erase things from the past, present and future at the same time.

But it's useless against trio goddess, that's the reason why he had to use a special sealing ability on UEG and Luu to seal them away.

Mind you, UEG and Luu don't need physical body, soul and mind to exist, because they are superior god and Malna in Sea of Darkness realm feat.
 
Resistance:
Resistance to Power Nullification: The person and the technology who said that power nullification doesn't work on him are 3-D beings, so obviously they can't negate a 1-B attack, Yogiri doesn't need to resist anything.

Resistance to Probability Manipulation: Has this character ever shown to use her probability manipulation to influence the 1-B attack and render it missing her? If not then obviously Yogiri killed her because of higher potency hax
Disagree with Power Nullification, and Agree with Resistance to Probability Manipulation.
 
Disagree with Resistance Negation.

Yogiri's hax being 1-B is an invalid reason to remove it.

Yogiri killed UEG and Gorbargion with his 1st seal, they're are higher dimensional than the Celestial foundations, and using current scaling for ID, both UEG and Gorbargion are also 1-B.

The concept of death doesn't apply to UEG, due to her being a superior god, and Yogiri was able to kill her with his 1st seal.
Show the scan about UEG having resistance to 1-B death manipulation and Yogiri negates her resistance as opposed to straight up killing her, which is just simply layer hax instead. And no scan says that the concept of death doesn’t apply to her, and even if such statement exists, it’s immortality type 5, not resistance to death manipulation.
Disagree with Non-Physical Interaction.

Yogiri had interacted with UEG, Luu and Alexia, they're superior gods and they don't need a physical body and they're non-existent, so using Sion as an example, when Sion teleported back to her place after seeing Yogiri, and he was able to attack her from there.

So Yogiri can know where trio goddess are, even if they are in non-existent state.

All God/Goddess have NEP 1, this was shown to us when Malna a lower tier god, got erased and died, she was then sent to the Sea of Darkness, where Malna non-existent state can't influence her former world and interact with any worlds in the Celestial foundations.
They don’t need physical bodies but Yogiri killed them when they still have physical bodies, and send the scan about Malna lacking soul, mind and concepts otherwise her NEP would not qualify just by lacking physical bodies alone.
Disagree with Causality Manipulation.

It's stated multiple times in the series that Yogiri abilities function with cause and effect.
Send me that scan and I will remove both his causality manipulation and acau 4 rather than just causality manipulation then. Functioning with cause and effect is natural for any existence, why does someone need to manipulate cause and effect to do that? Do I have causality manipulation since I’m bound to cause of effect as well?
Yogiri negated beings with his hax that have most immortality categories.
This is not an argument, for example to have type 1 immortality negation he needs to make a character no longer having eternal life, so they can eventually die by old age, something that Yogiri has never done before.
Disagree with Regeneration Negation Mid-Godly.

Mitsuki have an EE hax, which the ability is stated that it will erase things from the past, present and future at the same time.

But it's useless against trio goddess, that's the reason why he had to use a special sealing ability on UEG and Luu to seal them away.

Mind you, UEG and Luu don't need physical body, soul and mind to exist, because they are superior god and Malna in Sea of Darkness realm feat.
Give me the scan about Mitsuki erased them with such attack and those goddesses resurrected after that, otherwise it’s just EE resistance. Also gives me scan about Malna lacking soul and mind too.
 
The End
Attack Reflection, Time Stop, Time Manipulation, Spatial Manipulation: The reason apparently is because The End can replicate common powers in the Sea but I don't remember since when The End has ever shown power mimicry and it's also not listed anywhere as an ability on his profile. But assuming he can do something like that, saying that he has replicated these abilities just because lots of characters can access them without proper explanation is not persuasive for me
The last statement of THE END topics, I agree with you
 
Show the scan about UEG having resistance to 1-B death manipulation and Yogiri negates her resistance as opposed to straight up killing her, which is just simply layer hax instead. And no scan says that the concept of death doesn’t apply to her, and even if such statement exists, it’s immortality type 5, not resistance to death manipulation
Scan of UEG erased Touichiro and defeated him.

in UEG backstory, she fought against Alexia and Luu for ruling the world many times. They all were relative to each other at that time, which means UEG had resistance to Luu & Alexia death manipulation hax.

After the power balance shifted to Alexia, because of Mitsuki actions.

Alexia defeated UEG and Luu, after that it's stated that they sealed them.

Scan of Trio goddess fight and Alexia came out on top.

scan of Death concept doesn't apply to UEG.
 
Scan of UEG erased Touichiro and defeated him.
in UEG backstory, she fought against Alexia and Luu for ruling the world many times. They all were relative to each other at that time, which means UEG had resistance to Luu & Alexia death manipulation hax.

After the power balance shifted to Alexia, because of Mitsuki actions.

Alexia defeated UEG and Luu, after that it's stated that they sealed them.

Scan of Trio goddess fight and Alexia came out on top.
It does say that they get erased, but no further statements about any other aspect getting erased, which is Low-Godly at best.
scan of Death concept doesn't apply to UEG.
already adress this
even if such statement exists, it’s immortality type 5, not resistance to death manipulation.
So he simply negates type 5, not resistance negation.
 
Give me the scan about Mitsuki erased them with such attack and those goddesses resurrected after that, otherwise it’s just EE resistance
Mitsuki does indeed have such an EE, but again, there is no proof he used it on the goddesses or even if it works on Gods of the same level (or Gods as a whole tbf).

 
"Made sure to thoroughly erased him* and the person who did this can erase the concept of being. It’s not hard to connect the dots. Honestly, what have ID fans here been doing? Did something happen that made them lose interest in the verse?
 
they're busy complaining about the downgrades on discord and social media.
I'm talking about the ID fans here who passionately defended the verse back then, like that Oblivion guy. And I'm confident that half of those who complained off-site hadn’t actually read the novel, and some simply don’t have access here.
 
"Made sure to thoroughly erased him* and the person who did this can erase the concept of being. It’s not hard to connect the dots. Honestly, what have ID fans here been doing? Did something happen that made them lose interest in the verse?
I'd have to check, but I'm pretty sure those two cases are different from one another. This is a problem with the English translation, but that's another topic.

In any case, it's not like it was ever shown that this type of erasure works on gods
 
I'd have to check, but I'm pretty sure those two cases are different from one another. This is a problem with the English translation, but that's another topic.

In any case, it's not like it was ever shown that this type of erasure works on gods
If someone has the ability to destroy the concept of their target and then erased someone, and claimed they made sure to thoroughly erase them, then it's fair to assume that they did. But I don't know the full context so I guess?
 
If someone has the ability to destroy the concept of their target and then erased someone, and claimed they made sure to thoroughly erase them, then it's fair to assume that they did. But I don't know the full context so I guess?
In general, I would agree with you, but the fact that NO GODS in the story were shown to die from something else than physical attack or physical means (erasure) is problematic for me (along other stuff).
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top