DBH Revision?

[Zamasu_Chan]

So apparently, from what I heard, DBH qualifies for low 1-C.

For the same reason a regular timeline is the equivalent of an uncountably infinite number of "snapshots" of 3-dimensional universes, this "hypertimeline" would be the equivalent of an uncountably infinite number of "snapshots" 4-dimensional space-time continuums i.e. Low 1-C.
I mean, it'd be Low 1-C as long as the regular space-time continuums are bound within this timestream

Basically this ^. Since the universes are 4D the overarching timeline that contains all the universe should be big enough to contain "infinite snapshots" of the universes we treat as 4D. So if this is correct then technically DBH would qualify for low 1-C.

Heres the current DBH blog

 

[UchihaSlayer96]

 

[LightReinh12345]

I personally agree with Low 1-C DBH
But I dont think it will be accepted here come on its DB we are talking about

 

[Lormac_CC]

Following

 

[Zamasu_Chan]

I personally agree with Low 1-C DBH
But I dont think it will be accepted here come on its DB we are talking about

Personally I think this will lead to another wiki wide revision

 

[Dagoth_OwO]

Uhhhh where was this said?

 

[Ottavio_Merluzzo]

Following

Personally I think this will lead to another wiki wide revision

Lmao...

 

[Planck69]

I mean, if you're referring to how the timelines contain 18 universes then this should make sense.

 

[Arcker123]

DBH, first MFTL Low 1-C's.

 

[Dagoth_OwO]

Wait this is fr?

 

[UchihaSlayer96]

Wait this is fr?

Yeah, apparently.

 

[LightReinh12345]

Personally I think this will lead to another wiki wide revision

Lol yes

 

[Dagoth_OwO]

Yeah, apparently.

This is not going to end well

 

[LIFE_OF_KING]

DBH 5D via "OH, there is a world that sees everything as just a game, so it's 5D" or "Oh, it's said to be a dimension outside of time, so it's 5D" is mhe. But this point I never knew, so I am neutral

 

[Gilad_Hyperstar]

Following this

 

[UchihaSlayer96]

This is not going to end well

Naturally. Like Zamasu said, it'll most likely lead to the standards changing AGAIN, if we're being honest.

 

[Dagoth_OwO]

Anyways sorry if I'm repeating myself but, from who this quote comes from? If this is the current accepted standard then DBH should indeed be Low 1-C

 

[CR_Catinho]

Don't quote me on that but i think it has to be infinite on all axes for it to even qualify , and you only got 12 universes on the 5th axis .

If each timeline also had uncountably infinite universes inside it then it could work maybe .

 

[Ottavio_Merluzzo]

Don't quote me on that but i think it has to be infinite on all axes for it to even qualify , and you only got 12 universes on the 5th axis .

If each timeline also had uncountably infinite universes inside it then it could work maybe .

Man, you can have 1 universe in your verse and be 1-A, just saying. Fiction is crazy

 

[Planck69]

Don't quote me on that but i think it has to be infinite on all axes for it to even qualify , and you only got 12 universes on the 5th axis .

If each timeline also had uncountably infinite universes inside it then it could work maybe .

Not quite the logic used. It's basically the same as why destroying matter across all time is Low 2-C, since you're performing a 3-A feat an uncountably infinite number of times. This is that but the 3-A feat is Low 2-C.

 

[VinnyXD]

Oh oh no

 

[TheUnshakableOne]

Contact Ultima and Agnaa lol

 

[VinnyXD]

Personally I think this will lead to another wiki wide revision

You guys laughing like this not a possibility

 

[FluffyCreatureZ]

This is dumb DBH is obviously tier 0 since saiyans have no limits also, following.

 

[Hl3_or_bust]

I'm no DBH guru, but the argument so far, considering the lack of scans, seems to be trying to scale people to the timeline of events that the player experiences, which is ridiculous.

 

[Planck69]

And people, there's a Follow button above. Click that instead of spamming comments.

 

[CR_Catinho]

Man, you can have 1 universe in your verse and be 1-A, just saying. Fiction is crazy

I know , lol that's because 1-A isn't dependent in the cosmology like the rest of the tiers lol

Not quite the logic used. It's basically the same as why destroying matter across all time is Low 2-C, since you're performing a 3-A feat an uncountably infinite number of times. This is that but the 3-A feat is Low 2-C.

Idk man I'm no expert but it just sounds to good and easy to be true , i also saw a staff member say that u gotta be infinite on all axes for tier 2 anyway , let alone tier 1

 

[Planck69]

I'm no DBH guru, but the argument so far, considering the lack of scans, seems to be trying to scale people to the timeline of events that the player experiences, which is ridiculous.

Not quite. OP is talking about a single regular timeline. Since it holds uncountably infinite "12-18 universes" across all of its moments, then it'd be Low 1-C.

Of course, the OP should preferably link to the blog about the nature of timelines in DBH.

 

[Hl3_or_bust]

Idk man I'm no expert but it just sounds to good and easy to be true , i also saw a staff member say that u gotta be infinite on all axes for tier 2 anyway , let alone tier 1

Not really related to this specific CRT, but that entire argument is profoundly stupid.

Using that exact same logic, one could say that humans are 11-A because they are not infinitely large on a 3D scale.

 

[Planck69]

I know , lol that's because 1-A isn't dependent in the cosmology like the rest of the tiers lol

Idk man I'm no expert but it just sounds to good and easy to be true , i also saw a staff member say that u gotta be infinite on all axes for tier 2 anyway , let alone tier 1

You just have to be significant in size, which we treat as starting at universal length on all spatial axes.

 

[Maverick_Zero_X]

I mean, if you're referring to how the timelines contain 18 universes then this should make sense.

Shouldn’t this result in a canon DBS upgrade then

 

[CR_Catinho]

Not really related to this specific CRT, but that entire argument is profoundly stupid.

Using that exact same logic, one could say that humans are 11-A because they are not infinitely large on a 3D scale.

No i don't mean your body gotta be infinite on all axes , I'm obviously talking about the cosmology

 

[Planck69]

Shouldn’t this result in a canon DBS upgrade then

I guess. I doubt anyone would scale except maybe Zeno.

 

[Ottavio_Merluzzo]

I guess. I doubt anyone would scale except maybe Zeno.

Infinite Zamasu would "eventually become Low 1-C"

 

[Dagoth_OwO]

Of course, the OP should preferably link to the blog about the nature of timelines in DBH.

I mean it's pretty much the same as DBS + infinite timelines soooooo

 

[CR_Catinho]

You just have to be significant in size, which we treat as starting at universal length on all spatial axes.

I know that i don't that , I don't mean that the universe's size has to be infinite, I'm reffering to the number of universes , since they are just 12 of them .

I could be entirely wrong, as i said I'm no expert, just Stating smtg i saw in the previous tier 2 CRT

 

[Planck69]

Well, let's just wait for other staff.

Also, @Zamasu_Chan, I think you should link the blog about DBH timelines at the very least.

 

[Planck69]

I know that i don't that , I don't mean that the universe's size has to be infinite, I'm reffering to the number of universes , since they are just 12 of them .

I could be entirely wrong, as i said I'm no expert, just Stating smtg i saw in the previous tier 2 CRT

The reasoning is irrelevant to the number of universes though, only the relationship of whatever universes are present in comparison to an overarching timeline.

 

[LIFE_OF_KING]

I doubt anyone would scale except maybe Zeno.

It scares me

 

[Ovy7]

Seems uncontroversial enough, I agree.