-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Composite Organism Part 3: The Venom Saga
- Thread starter Niarobi_(Formerly_Hadou)
- Start date
- Status
Agnaa
VS Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Translation Helper
Human Resources
Gold Supporter
- 15,678
- 14,063
Why is it rejected? You said on the blog that it's because it's a colony, but the 7-A calc is based on a clonal colony as well. CT's profile is also based on a clonal colony of trees. Sorry that I'm responding to your comment on the blog here, but I didn't realize it was there until now, clonal colonies are mentioned multiple times on CT's profile (age, classification, range), and in its battles. I think CT's AP is only what it is because it can't really use that colony for AP; trees can't punch.Kepekley23 said:
I just want some clarification here. Changing CT's profile and reconsidering some of its victories, and going back to something else for these calcs, maybe like using extinct whales/dinosaurs/trees for the size/weight instead of clonal colonies?
Also, on the antimatter bacteria, that is blatantly out of our technological capabilities. iiirc it was a huge achievement just a year or two back to create a few molecules made out of antimatter, to think that someone could create bacteria, which is many orders of magnitude more complex and larger, almost 10 years ago is ludicrous to me. Especially when it isn't mentioned anywhere else.
I agree that this profile has a lot of wank, but that's because composite profiles in general are wanked. Poisons can't ACTUALLY combine like they do on this thread, but we pretend that they can for the sake of having the profiles be interesting.
- 15,332
- 7,563
Changing CT's profile is actually the best course of action. This is supposed to be an organism; clonal colonies aren't one organism, they are a group of genetically identical organisms. It makes no sense for us to get an AP based on that.
Speed might be fine, although it'd get a downgrade
Speed might be fine, although it'd get a downgrade
- 15,332
- 7,563
Update: After a bit of reading on 'em, clonal colonies might be fine to use, but let me see.
Agnaa
VS Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Translation Helper
Human Resources
Gold Supporter
- 15,678
- 14,063
I went back to look for calcs that didn't use a clonal colony, but since the start Pando (clonal colony of trees) and A. Solidipes (clonal colony of fungus) were used, meaning we'd need an entirely new calc, and certainly a downgrade. However, these articles argue that since it's a being made up of identical cells that communicate, have a common purpose (or can at least coordinate themselves), that it should be considered as one organism.
As far as I can tell, this definition should spread to the sea grass as well. The question is, do we use that definition, or do we have a different definition for organism?
As far as I can tell, this definition should spread to the sea grass as well. The question is, do we use that definition, or do we have a different definition for organism?
- 184
- 8
what part is wankMatthew Schroeder said:
- 184
- 8
and just use the most common organism if you care that much
- 5,618
- 392
I mean this profile is not even out yet, still not too late to improve its quality.
- 3,706
- 316
- Thread starter
- #249
You guys can remove the antimatter stuff until I get confirmation from the author that what he was speaking of was a real thing and not just a theoretical organism.
As for a picture, this thing should have sufficient enough camouflage to just not have a picture.
As for a picture, this thing should have sufficient enough camouflage to just not have a picture.
- 184
- 8
or just do a https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eukaryote type picture
- 2,463
- 928
What about the image of RuBisCO? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rubisco.png
It is one of the most common proteins...
It is one of the most common proteins...
- 184
- 8
either could prob work
- 3,706
- 316
- Thread starter
- #254
As I said, this thing has good enough camouflage to where it would basically look invisible and not need a picture.
- 184
- 8
i think it would have a form naturally.
- 5,618
- 392
Unfortunately it's invisibility is not good enough to avoid this wiki rules, so it's still need a picture.
- 3,706
- 316
- Thread starter
- #257
Fine. ;-;
It probably looks pretty Eldritch. I'm not sure if one picture can cover this abomination. We can probably put like several pictures in a tabber, like one for each domain, and then a virus picture.
It probably looks pretty Eldritch. I'm not sure if one picture can cover this abomination. We can probably put like several pictures in a tabber, like one for each domain, and then a virus picture.
- 2,748
- 178
I vote for slime mold.
- 184
- 8
yeah, a pic for each three domains might work
- 184
- 8
slime mold? i guess yeah. you could do that
- 2,463
- 928
Is this image ok for rendering and blackening?RRTheEndMan said:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fuligo_septica_bl1.JPG
- 184
- 8
hmm, idk. maybe try something more animal-like or bacteria-like
- 2,463
- 928
Musca domestica (house fly)?Unimportantalt said:
Escherichia coli?
About your idea:
I can try to combine these pictures: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Halobacteria.jpg; https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EscherichiaColi_NIAID.jpg (I'll try to render and blacken first two pictures); https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Musca.domestica.female.jpg (I've already rendered and blackened it); https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/File:Virus-VERT-PSD_-_Edited.png (I hope that ArbitraryNumbers won't beat me for using his work...)
- 184
- 8
that could work actually. a fly is a good example of an organismSkalt711 said:
- 5,618
- 392
^Unimportantalt said:
- 2,463
- 928
Unimportantalt said:
Based on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Musca.domestica.female.jpg
Here's my work. Bad quality, but it can be fixed.
- 5,618
- 392
I mean it is a fly..not really resemble CO.
- 184
- 8
maybe combine that fly with other features with photoshop
- 2,463
- 928
Am I correctly interpreted your idea, Unimportantalt?
Sources: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Halobacteria.jpg; https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EscherichiaColi_NIAID.jpg; https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/File:Virus-VERT-PSD_-_Edited.png; https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fuligo_septica.jpg
Sources: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Halobacteria.jpg; https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EscherichiaColi_NIAID.jpg; https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/File:Virus-VERT-PSD_-_Edited.png; https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fuligo_septica.jpg
- 5,618
- 392
I like that.. maybe replace one of the 2 virus images with animal images to somewhat represent animal too?
- 8,377
- 3,045
An animal and a plant, maybe?
- 5,618
- 392
Personally i'm ok with 4, just need to replace 1 of the images to represent animal as well.
example
example
- 5,618
- 392
Well i forgot about plant too...TriforcePower1 said:
- 5,618
- 392
I think we can use the fly pic above, human(maybe) and 1 plants for a total of 6 life forms.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
