H3110l12345I20
He/Him- 4,918
- 2,468
I have faith in a 9 ft tall patagonian, but anything above that & the person's already dying. Even if we did say that 12 - 15 ft giants existed in Argentina, the Tehuelches & the fantasies of Europeans attributed to the myth. The former peoples lived in the patagonian plains, which were temperate usually.
Even with the cooler temperatures of the little ice age, we're forgetting the limits of human biology & natural selection. The square-cubed law limits the person's theoretical max height. In order to surpass the 9 ft height, the human would need to have a different physiology to handle their circulatory system problems & at that point, they wouldn't be a homo sapien anymore & thus CH wouldn't involve a patagonian.
With natural selection as a limit, I don't think we'll see giant homo sapiens anytime soon due to their circulatory, mobility & disease problems.
So by example of my analysis of these feats, there's 2 reasons why we can't use Jesus. We can't scientifically test or prove some of his feats' validity (as it's hard to do so), & that we'll argue over him because many people just love Jesus so much.
Even with the cooler temperatures of the little ice age, we're forgetting the limits of human biology & natural selection. The square-cubed law limits the person's theoretical max height. In order to surpass the 9 ft height, the human would need to have a different physiology to handle their circulatory system problems & at that point, they wouldn't be a homo sapien anymore & thus CH wouldn't involve a patagonian.
With natural selection as a limit, I don't think we'll see giant homo sapiens anytime soon due to their circulatory, mobility & disease problems.
Jesus is another story, "Seth can't say it better than I could" as I quote. He was a miracle worker, but he's stated to be god & an incarnate of him. Both of these statements can't really be tested scientifically since he died a long time ago & god is more subtle & expected to be followed by faith than direct. Science just has materialistic for the subtle ways so it's unfortunately another Schrodinger's cat here.
Some of his miracles would be in the territory where science can't explain or prove that he did the feats even if the sources were trusted. Some of the sources should most importantly be the most trusted here. Akin to Terminal Lucidity & the IRL Annabelle doll.
People have been pseudo resurrected days in colder temperatures but the true details of his resurrection are contradictory or scarce at best.
His cures are usually with spit & mud & surprisingly, spit & mud can help heal wounds but on the level of giving a paralyzed person the ability to move instantly & touching a man & saying faithful words to cure illnesses is... impossible scientifically without Jesus's power.
Some of his miracles would be in the territory where science can't explain or prove that he did the feats even if the sources were trusted. Some of the sources should most importantly be the most trusted here. Akin to Terminal Lucidity & the IRL Annabelle doll.
People have been pseudo resurrected days in colder temperatures but the true details of his resurrection are contradictory or scarce at best.
His cures are usually with spit & mud & surprisingly, spit & mud can help heal wounds but on the level of giving a paralyzed person the ability to move instantly & touching a man & saying faithful words to cure illnesses is... impossible scientifically without Jesus's power.
So by example of my analysis of these feats, there's 2 reasons why we can't use Jesus. We can't scientifically test or prove some of his feats' validity (as it's hard to do so), & that we'll argue over him because many people just love Jesus so much.
Last edited: