Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ok . Just asked to clarify this so there won't be misunderstandingsRicsi-viragosi said:No, that would lead to the inflation it warns about.
Yeah we do when there's sufficient evidence and the difference is very small, and getting a + sign should not be any different. I agree with that part. But we don't use a fixed difference in AP as a requirement. If we decide to apply that to the + sign, we'll also have to do the same for tiers.Ricsi-viragosi said:We already do that tough. Upscaling tiers I mean. Not from baseline obviously, but still.
Isn't that moreso in the case of exact multipliers, or are you referring to something else?Ricsi-viragosi said:We already do that tough. Upscaling tiers I mean. Not from baseline obviously, but still.
Ricsi-viragosi said:"A + can only be added without a direct calculation above the arithmetic average if there is one very close to it, and characters scale above the calculated feat by a wide margin, like being able to defeat enemies on such levels with a single attack. Jumps greater than X1.5 in power should not be assumed, as it would lead to potentially large power jumps, inflating the rating of certain characters."
This can't be stacked though. Storming ten people won't give 1.5^10.Mindovin said:If we use 1.5x or any number I'm afraid it going to lead to one-shotting / stomping chain.
So you mean that if there are Characters A,B and C, where A AP stomps B, B AP stomps C, and C is twice below the "+" requirment, is it possible for character A to have a plus rating based on your words?Therefir said:The 1.5x is certainly a bit arbitrary, but I think it was made to avoid any tier+ character to upscale to the following tier.
So if you want to upscale to a higher tier, you would need to stomp characters with feats already very close to the next tier, and not any character with a barely tier+ feat.