- 11,910
- 4,281
To be honest, I've used GPT to find various results many times, and often GPT gives me inaccurate calculations.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To be honest, I've used GPT to find various results many times, and often GPT gives me inaccurate calculations.
Gpt3.5 is awful yeahTo be honest, I've used GPT to find various results many times, and often GPT gives me inaccurate calculations.
In other words, the same damn value Kachon gotFirst, let's find the final velocity (v). Ignoring relativity, we can use the formula:
v = 0.9 * c
where c is the speed of light (approximately 299,792,458 m/s).
v ≈ 0.9 * 299,792,458 v ≈ 269,813,212.2 m/s
Now that we have the final velocity, we can find the acceleration (a) using the formula:
a = v^2 / (2 * d)
where d is the distance (1.25023382 meters).
a = (269,813,212.2)^2 / (2 * 1.25023382) a ≈ 3.09286479 * 10^16 m/s^2
Now we can find the force (F) using Newton's second law:
F = m * a
where m is the mass of the object (70 kg).
F = 70 * 3.09286479 * 10^16 F ≈ 2.16500536 * 10^18 N
So, approximately 2.165 * 10^18 Newtons of force would be needed to accelerate a 70 kg object to 90% of the speed of light in 1.25023382 meters
If the speed of the launch itself at the point of impact is 0.9c, meaning after the kick the velocity can only go down due to deceleration, and the initial velocity is Boros's leg at rest, this makes no sense.In other words, the same damn value Kachon got
Pretty damn neat, huh?
I'm just gonna post the chatgpt log from the beginning of the entire calc, starting from the energy.We start with Saitama being launched at 0.9c
You misspelled Kachon as well**** I misspelled Saitama
You also misspelled BorosI made a version using F=MA instead of work
Also I got a larger size for Boros's leg than Katchon
Boros Kicks Saitam to the Moon
vsbattles.fandom.com
**** I misspelled Saitama
It's on purposeYou also misspelled Boros
ohI think 3.5
Honestly I didn't even read the blog before I said "you misspelled boros" that was just a lucky guessIt's on purpose
Your GPT explicitly stated it ignored relativity, which might have something to do with it. I trained mine before/during the process to perfect the accuracyoh
uh the thing is, gpt3.5 is actually incredibly stupid, and only really excels at doing simple stuff insanely quickly
in terms of logic, gpt4 is like unironically at least 5 times better
so it's weird that it got 10^20 multiple times, when gpt4 got 10^18 consistently on my end.
well relativity would change the force, not the speed (it being ftl was the main thing that matters) but here ya go, it does some shit I do not understand at all, it's above my paygrade right nowYour GPT explicitly stated it ignored relativity, which might have something to do with it. I trained mine before/during the process to perfect the accuracy
this was confirmed after reflexion to increase accuracy as well.As I mentioned earlier, calculating the force required to accelerate a 70 kg object to 90% of the speed of light in 1.25023382 meters while considering relativity involves solving a transcendental equation, which typically requires numerical methods. I will attempt to provide an approximate solution using a simplification of the problem. First, let's calculate the rapidity (ϕ) required to reach 90% of the speed of light. Rapidity is an alternative measure of velocity in special relativity and is additive, unlike velocities themselves. It can be calculated using the following formula: ϕ = arctanh(v/c) where v is the desired velocity (0.9c), and c is the speed of light. ϕ = arctanh(0.9) ϕ ≈ 1.47221949 Next, let's find the proper acceleration (a') required to cover the distance (d) in the object's rest frame. This can be calculated using the following formula: d = (c^2 / a') * (cosh(ϕ) - 1) Solving for a': a' = (c^2 / d) * (cosh(ϕ) - 1) a' = (299,792,458^2 / 1.25023382) * (cosh(1.47221949) - 1) a' ≈ 3.20620227 * 10^16 m/s^2 Now we need to calculate the force (F) in the object's initial rest frame, which can be found using the following formula: F = m * a * γ where m is the object's rest mass (70 kg), a is the proper acceleration (a'), and γ is the Lorentz factor, which can be calculated as: γ = 1 / sqrt(1 - (v^2 / c^2)) For 90% of the speed of light: γ = 1 / sqrt(1 - (0.9 * c)^2 / c^2) γ ≈ 2.29415734 Finally, we can calculate the force (F): F = 70 * 3.20620227 * 10^16 * 2.29415734 F ≈ 5.125 * 10^18 N Please note that this is still an approximate solution, as it does not fully account for the complexity of the problem. The force required to accelerate a 70 kg object to 90% of the speed of light in 1.25023382 meters while considering relativity is approximately 5.125 * 10^18 Newtons.
this machine is talking about transcendentals and rapidity, its doing way too much for this featwell relativity would change the force, not the speed (it being ftl was the main thing that matters) but here ya go, it does some shit I do not understand at all, it's above my paygrade right now
this was confirmed after reflexion to increase accuracy as well.
but absically it's about double the force
K so now it's 2.21587615*10^18 Newtons (Class P)It's on purpose
I call him Broccoli at the end
Also now that I'm looking at it I thing a 90 degree rotation makes more sense here
brb
shit gets serious real quick when you ask about relativitythis machine is talking about transcendentals and rapidity, its doing way too much for this feat
When considering relativity, the calculations become more complex. As an object's velocity approaches the speed of light, its mass increases due to relativistic effects. This means that the force needed to continue accelerating the object also increases.
To account for this, we use the concept of relativistic mass (m_r), which is given by the formula:
m_r = m / sqrt(1 - (v^2 / c^2))
where m is the object's rest mass (70 kg), v is its velocity, and c is the speed of light (approximately 299,792,458 m/s).
Since the object's mass increases with its velocity, the acceleration will not be constant. Therefore, we can't directly use the classical equations of motion to find the force. Instead, we can refer to the work-energy theorem, which states that the work done (W) on an object is equal to the change in its kinetic energy (ΔK):
W = ΔK = K_f - K_i
where K_f is the final kinetic energy, and K_i is the initial kinetic energy (0, assuming the object is initially at rest). The kinetic energy of a relativistic object is given by:
K = (m_r - m) * c^2
We want the object to reach 90% of the speed of light (v = 0.9 * c). So, we can find the relativistic mass (m_r) at that velocity:
m_r = 70 / sqrt(1 - (0.9 * c)^2 / c^2) m_r ≈ 153.93 kg
Now we can find the change in kinetic energy (ΔK):
ΔK = (153.93 - 70) * c^2 ΔK ≈ 1.259 * 10^19 J
Since work (W) is equal to the force (F) multiplied by the distance (d) over which it is applied:
F = W / d
where d is the distance (1.25023382 meters).
F = 1.259 * 10^19 J / 1.25023382 m F ≈ 1.007 * 10^19 N
Therefore, approximately 1.007 * 10^19 Newtons of force would be needed to accelerate a 70 kg object to 90% of the speed of light in 1.25023382 meters when considering relativity. Keep in mind that these calculations are still a simplification of the problem, and a more rigorous treatment would involve solving the equations of motion in the context of special relativity.
What would you like to change it to?K so now it's 2.21587615*10^18 Newtons (Class P)
Is there anyway at all to change the blog's title?
I want to add the a to SaitamaWhat would you like to change it to?
Oofshit gets serious real quick when you ask about relativity
Here’s what it said in its initial response, which it later claimed that it corrected by doing that more complex stuff, but I’ll just leave it here anyways for documentation
I want to add the a to Saitama
Boros Kicks Saitam to the Moon
vsbattles.fandom.com
Can you change the name of this blog please
Ftl acceleration isn’t allowed if the feat actually accelerates to ftlYou should probably make a Calculation Group Thread for the acceleration thing, I wasn't really given a reason why FTL acceleration wasn't allowed, I was just told it isn't.
ChatGPT said we goodRemember: the feat was 90% sol, so it being accelerated to ftl was never a risk to begin with
We derive the timeframe and force from the 90% sol, not deriving ftl from the timeframe and force
Not really a loopholeWhy do I get the feeling that this is a strange loophole that you are using to get around?
This thread turned into a theory thread; I would recommend when all is said and done, we make a new thread using the agreed upon calcs so it is neater. This thread is a wasteland lmao
I'm currently on mobile, so I can't seem to do it. I'll change the name when I reach home, sorryCan you change the name of this blog please
average human being discussion tbhaverage opm thread tbh
average human being discussion tbh
how long till gpt4 takes over the debating part too?
Yeah just use Kachon or mines for RN
I'm literally learning Relativistic Mechanics so I can calc this bitch
You could probably check after I finish cause I'm probably gonna screw something upIf only I wasn't in the middle of my 3 week exam period, I'd be able to do more stuff here.