- 13,903
- 5,405
What art thou hath waffleage forAnime Boros seen this:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What art thou hath waffleage forAnime Boros seen this:
WWW Toothless Boros or Toothless Gums?Toothless fight would be pure gums
What art thou hath waffleage for
Just noticed you used google translate instead of DeepL or gpt4, shame on you sirI was wrong, because like a fool a trusted Viz and it was actually much worse
Boros in the raw didn't even saw he fazed Saitama. He said Saitama lied, had strength to spare and called the fight toothless because Saitama was that much stronger.
HOLY SHIT GUYS 4-C CARNAGE KABUTO?!?!?!!!!!11
HE COVERED HIMSELF GUYS!!
HE-HE REACTED GUYS?!?!?!!11 LOOK AT HIS EYES! AND HE STAGGERS!!!
4-C OPM IS REAL
Tier 4 OPM was right in front of us all along and we didn't realize it
Deepl gives thisJust noticed you used google translate instead of DeepL or gpt4, shame on you sir
Fixing the weird grammar it's still horribly bad for Boros "I was outmatched. It wasn't even a fight".It was like we were outmatched. We weren't even in the fight.
It wasn't even a fight.
According to daddy gpt4 the kanji for tooth is used, but not “toothless”Deepl also translates it weird, since Boros in the raw uses Kanji for toothless.
One request
Get me the raws for this page (in text)
手ごたえ あった
Deepl says the followingどうやら勝敗が見えて
So... lmao.I'm getting the hang of this.
Looks like we've got a winner.
I think I see it.
Don't use Chat GPT for translationAccording to daddy gpt4 the kanji for tooth is used, but not “toothless”
Means toothlessまるで歯が立たなかっ
Me on my way to defy authorityDon't use Chat GPT for translation
Agree that gpt3.5 is trash for translations thoughSure, I'll break down the Japanese sentence 手ごたえ あった and translate it into English step by step, focusing on each character/kanji at a time.
The sentence consists of two parts:
Let's start with the first part:
- 手ごたえ
- あった
手ごたえ
This word can be broken down into two components:
Together, "手ごたえ" (Tegotae) means "response" or "feedback", but it often implies a sense of resistance or a feeling that you've touched or affected something. In a more metaphorical sense, it can mean "sign" or "indication".
- 手 (Te) which means "hand" in English.
- ごたえ (Gōtae) doesn't have a direct standalone meaning but when combined with 手, it forms a whole new word with a distinct meaning.
Now, let's move onto the second part:
あった
This is the past tense of the verb "ある" (Aru) which means "to be" or "to exist" for inanimate objects or non-living things.
So, "あった" translates to "was" or "existed".
Now, when we put the two parts together:
手ごたえ あった
Literally, it could translate to "There was a response" or "A sign existed". However, depending on context, it might be more natural to interpret it as "There was a reaction" or "I felt a response". It implies that the speaker felt some kind of resistance, response, or sign from the other party or from what they were doing. It's often used in contexts where the speaker has taken some action or made some effort and is reporting that they could sense its effect.
All you need to do is break it downMe on my way to defy authority
Cmon bruh, I'm just pointing out that Saitama blocking means nothingand recon I have beef with you.
well it's supporting evidence, and I'm using all the supporting evidence I can find, because more of it makes more consistency, that's how it is with like everything in this verseCmon bruh, I'm just pointing out that Saitama blocking means nothing
well he didn't block it, he just destroyed itBut it doesn't support anything Ziller, Saitama blocking an attack means nothing.
It's like saying Sonic with his sword scales to Saitama because he has made an effort to destroy/block the sword instead of just tanking it
As in the statement was actually backed up by the intention of it being true, or else it wouldn’t have been claimed as rivaling abilities in the guidebook, or followed by Boros’ monologueI don't. It was literally a statement that was removed.
First part of your response “because Boros never damaged saitama” which isn’t an argument, because the debate is about if he damaged saitama. “He didn’t damage Saitama” isn’t a real counterpoint to saying he damaged saitama. If you’re going to response saying burden of proof, then it doesn’t really change that this is pointless to sayIt isn't. Because Boros never damaged Saitama and never came close to challenging him.
Saitama humoring Boros at the end of the fight has no bearing on anything. Him humoring him doesn’t change the fact that the attacks visibly had a slight affect on him, nor does it change the fact that Saitama did objectively consider it to almost be a real fight in his own mind, which directly disproves the idea that he was just hyping Boros up for pity. He didn’t threaten saitama, nobody is saying that, but he did have an affect on him in the same way that any weak guy can hit a strong guy on the back of the head and it would have some small affect.It does. Saitama was humoring Boros. It's why he tries and make him feel alright before he dies. At no point did Boros actually threaten or harm Saitama.
It’s from the BoronerHe has some similar enough to generate a cracking sound effect.
Well Saitama himself said he got scratched.Putting dirt on Saitama isn't the same as actually damaging him. Cosmic Garou with a vast array of powers and copy hax failed to even make Saitama bleed. Boros is no different.
The guidebook is wrong (and has been intentionally wrong in other sections) and Boros' monologs is contradicted by his final monologue where he states he did absolutely nothing to Saitama and it wasn't even a real fight.As in the statement was actually backed up by the intention of it being true, or else it wouldn’t have been claimed as rivaling abilities in the guidebook, or followed by Boros’ monologue
It literally is. Your entire scaling chain hinges on Released Boros hurting Saitama to some minor degree, so he should scale higher than Garou.First part of your response “because Boros never damaged saitama” which isn’t an argument, because the debate is about if he damaged saitama. “He didn’t damage Saitama” isn’t a real counterpoint to saying he damaged saitama.
Because he doesn't hurt Saitama. He said he got a response and then concluded he will win the fight. When it's shown that Saitama was still not tapping into his full power.If we can give it to Boros’ general then I don’t see why we can’t give it to Boros after he’s seemingly met the same criteria of punching above his durability.
He affected Saitama in the same way Bakuzan, Carnage Kabuto or Beefcake effected Saitama. He did nothing real.but he did have an affect on him in the same way that any weak guy can hit a strong guy on the back of the head and it would have some small affect
Which character directly said the fight was fake and Saitama was to powerful? Boros doesn't scale to Garou. He upscales from Tornado which is fine.Take a wild guess, which attack had more of an affect on him just looking at this?
Truly the greatest argumentNuh uh
We already know how you feel damageThis discussion on the hype text editor statements above is pointless.
They will never be accepted. They are by definition non-canon.
You saying for the 100th time that Saitama overpowered him very easily and me saying for the 100th time that it doesn’t matter, because I’m just saying he barely affected him, but it was a level of effectiveness that Monster Garou blatantly couldn’t replicate. Stop repeating the argument that Saitama was way stronger, we know, and it’s really not changing anythingBoros was wrong, as he himself said. He was doing nothing to Saitama and didn't gaze him. Saitama still immediately overpowered him whenever he tried and Boros' super move was stopped without Saitama even tapping into his fuller strength.
Saitama had no killing intent against Garou. Saitama had killing intent against Boros. You should’ve already seen this response coming.For the normal punches Boros was gibbed and turned to mush, while Garou always remained whole. So thst example doesn't really worked
Boros himself said that Saitama’s wounds would gradually increase, never did Boros say that his attacks did nothing at all, he just said he got stomped to shit which is true. Again, being stomped doesn’t mean you’re incapable of affecting them. Boros affected Saitama.He didn't do any damage to Saitama, as Boros himself said.
You also can't use author intent. As the author literally removed the line meaning their intent was thst he did no damage.
Saitama was visibly shaken after his punch connected and got all serious face in the next moment. Boros could clearly tell that he did something to Saitama, at least enough for him to feel it, and it’s very visible that Saitama did feel it.Boros never damaged Saitama in the first place, which is the point. Saitama received no wounds and its relived he was holding back for the entire match.
Oh so you were always like thisI altered OPM scaling far before becoming an admin. I was here back when we scaled Golden Ball above Genos and DSK because he fought Garou. I'm also the one who helped out with the CSRC changes. Overall my stance from three years ago to now hasn't changed.
Boros never stated that nothing happened, and in fact only ever stated the opposite. Being stomped ≠ never affecting himNothing happened to him, as Boros himself stated.
Additional justification is always good when we have so much Boros downplay hereWe already scale Boros above her, so I don't understand why you'd even bring her up.
A “retconned” statement that was confirmed in the databook laterFor the 20th time we aren't scaling Boros to Garou based off of a retconed statement, a passage that is mostly wrong and reading into author intent without knowing the author and ignoring the actual example of author intent.
You are completely making shit up. As I have already told you, there is no statement where Boros said he did absolutely nothing, all we have is a statement saying he did do something, likely a scratch in the same manner he was scratched by Garou. Boros’ plan was explicitly supposed to be a war of attrition by wearing him down with chip damage, which of course only failed so quickly because he decided to burn up all of his energy on a few attacks soon after. And for the love of god STOP SAYING it wasn’t a real fight, we literally know that, the whole point is that it was almost a real fight. It doesn’t have to be a real fight for Boros to do a very minor amount of damage against Saitama.The guidebook is wrong (and has been intentionally wrong in other sections) and Boros' monologs is contradicted by his final monologue where he states he did absolutely nothing to Saitama and it wasn't even a real fight.
Responding to a claim with an opposing claim isn’t a counterargument, it’s just a disagreement. I say Boros was able to affect saitama because of this expression and this statement and this Garou scene and this deep sea king moment and etc. you say “that’s not true, because he never took damage”It literally is. Your entire scaling chain hinges on Released Boros hurting Saitama to some minor degree, so he should scale higher than Garou.
But Boros didn't harm Saitama and was so thoroughly outclassed he states the entire fight was fake at the end.
Him not knowing Saitama’s full strength has no bearing on the fact that he simply witnessed his attack having an affect on Saitama. Sure he was holding back massively, but that’s something he couldn’t have precisely accounted for, but he did objectively witness that he was doing chip damage, and therefore concluded that he could outlast himBecause he doesn't hurt Saitama. He said he got a response and then concluded he will win the fight. When it's shown that Saitama was still not tapping into his full power.
Boros until the very end underestimated Saitama at almost every point.
Bakuzan literally didn’t change his expression:He affected Saitama in the same way Bakuzan, Carnage Kabuto or Beefcake effected Saitama. He did nothing real.
Boros didn't replicate it either since Saitama was giving him a fake fight the entire time. Saitama also got serious face against Garou and like Boros wasn't trying in any capacity.was a level of effectiveness that Monster Garou blatantly couldn’t replicate.
Saitama was willing to lie to Boros and humor his goal. Him being killed at the end doesn't change that Boros accomplished nothing against someone who was given bare minimum effort.Saitama had no killing intent against Garou. Saitama had killing intent against Boros. You should’ve already seen this response coming.
He didn't because Saitama is quadrillions of time stronger than Boros and was so vastly above his pay grade that Boros couldn't even quantify the sheer gap between them.Again, being stomped doesn’t mean you’re incapable of affecting them. Boros affected Saitama.
We don't downplay Boros, you just high ball him. Boros is currently rated as the fifth strongest person in the franchise behind Saitama, God, Blast and Garou.Additional justification is always good when we have so much Boros downplay here
It's not ""retconned"" in quotation marks. It was literally removed. Ziller the statement is unusable so drop it from your arguments.retconned” statement that was confirmed in the databook later
And the “mostly” part of the passage wasn’t even wrong, because they were phrased as questions instead of statements.
You just have fan blinders on.You are completely making shit up.
It is an actual counterargument, it's just one you don't like because it Ruins your weird scaling ideas.stop pretending that it’s an actual argument and just stick to everything else you’ve been talking about. You might’ve forgotten, but this isn’t a crt, so you don’t get to shut me down by staff disagreeing and then not give further reasoning.
You're arguing that Boros should be 4-A here. We're not doing that when Boros himself acknowledged the fight was entirely fake and he did nothing.was doing chip damage
Boros is stronger than anyone Saitama fought up to thst point. That doesn't mean he comes close to Saitama's full strength and it certainly doesn't mean he's scaling to Cosmic Fear Garou or Blast.The fact that he could even tell that Boros was close to being a real fight at all proves definitively that he did feel something very slightly stronger than everyone else.
Have you been under this impression the whole timeYou're arguing that Boros should be 4-A here.
Yes. Dinner your line of reasoning is that or Blast scaling.Have you been under this impression the whole time
well no I was just saying that he should be > extreme fa jin garou...that's really itYes. Dinner your line of reasoning is that or Blast scaling.