- 8,173
- 2,212
I mean if you close the thread it doesn't change anything, the calc is still fine and we've supported the assumption. I rather not go in circles again with the same people again who refuse to provide any hard evidence.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Bleach: Speed upgrade
- Thread starter USklaverei
- Start date
-
- Tags
- bleach
- Status
- 20,729
- 3,679
This is a pretty absurd statement to make, you don't need a calc to debunk a calc, you simply need to debunk the assumptions and values used by it.
How can we have a calc when there is NO feat here? there's literally nothing to calc and that's the problem
I was on the assumption that the calc was fine. Nothing else.
My dood.
How can we have a calc when there is NO feat here? there's literally nothing to calc and that's the problem
I was on the assumption that the calc was fine. Nothing else.
My dood.
- 2,939
- 1,400
- Thread starter
- #323
I really do not know why Liltotto's talent was addressed here, but that's okay.
- 2,684
- 317
Is everyone gonna ignore what I proposed ?
- 2,684
- 317
...Shit is gonna hit the fan in just a few moments
Or not... I really hope not
Or not... I really hope not
- 8,173
- 2,212
Doubt it, nothing will happend to this feat since they can't debunk it. I already stated I was okay with Ant's suggestion.
- 8,173
- 2,212
The ones who posted evidence from the manga.
- 2,684
- 317
Can we please reach a agreement to get everybody happy ?
- 1,673
- 289
There is no solution that can please everyone, people are going to have to accept one side has better arguments and the other will have to deal with that.Dangai Ichigo said:
- 2,684
- 317
I know that but it just feels bad seeing this derail like this
- 8,173
- 2,212
No.
- 16,214
- 11,660
This seems fine from first glance.
- 8,173
- 2,212
Nothing to apply since it won't increase speed tier anymore xD.
- 7
- 0
Ichigo's top speed should at least be FTL+, as he should be many thousands, if not millions of times faster than Soul-Society arc Shuhei Hisagi, who dodged light. Kubo has also stated that when Ichigo and Byakuya were fighting, they were moving at lightning speeds. Now I know somebody will start spouting some "return-stroke" bullsh*t, so let me get this perfectly straight: LIGHTNING MOVES AT THE SPEED OF F*CKING LIGHT!!! Therefore, weak-as-piss (pardon my french) Soul-Society arc Ichigo was at least sub-relativistic to light speed. Ichigo with his true Bankai is 10x stronger than Mugetsu Ichigo. With his merged hollow form (Vasto Lorde), which is approximately a 1000x multiplier as VL can be scaled to SE Ulquiorra, who was 1000x stronger than pre-timeskip bankai Ichigo.
And honestly, if someone says that Soul-Society arc Bankai Ichigo is even relative to Mugetsu, then they are beyond help. Long story short, he's way, way faster than light. I can't tell you how much faster because I do not know the exact immense power gap between Soul-Society arc Bankai Ichigo and Mugetsu.
If you want to see my proof of Shuhei Hisagi dodging light, here is the clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGSX2JVSbPo&t=28s
Watch from 0:55.
And honestly, if someone says that Soul-Society arc Bankai Ichigo is even relative to Mugetsu, then they are beyond help. Long story short, he's way, way faster than light. I can't tell you how much faster because I do not know the exact immense power gap between Soul-Society arc Bankai Ichigo and Mugetsu.
If you want to see my proof of Shuhei Hisagi dodging light, here is the clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGSX2JVSbPo&t=28s
Watch from 0:55.
- 31,608
- 28,109
> Lightning moves at the speed of light
Not according to the standards for lightning on VS Battles wiki from what I recall. It is at around 440 km/s.
Not according to the standards for lightning on VS Battles wiki from what I recall. It is at around 440 km/s.
- 31,659
- 34,724
Lightning is only 440,000 m/s and Light is 299,792,458 m/s. Also, that was the Anime and there was a discussion that that wasn't real light a long time ago.
- 2,684
- 317
Who is that lost child
- 6,014
- 2,122
Small Rectification:
Lightning itself isn't really 440.000m/s, it's an average value, it can varie from much lower than 440K to at least 1/3 of the speed of light.
Lightning itself isn't really 440.000m/s, it's an average value, it can varie from much lower than 440K to at least 1/3 of the speed of light.
- 2,939
- 1,400
- Thread starter
- #347
So the result has changed again and now to the greater.
I saw some "similar" calculations and realized that everyone was using arm + sword, so I went to confirm this with calc members (here and here ). And, in fact, arm + sword is used, but in my calculation this was not considered, but I corrected it.
I saw some "similar" calculations and realized that everyone was using arm + sword, so I went to confirm this with calc members (here and here ). And, in fact, arm + sword is used, but in my calculation this was not considered, but I corrected it.
- 31,608
- 28,109
Just to check, but how do we know that his sword was used? The feat was off-panel.
- 1,673
- 289
You should only include sword length into the calc if it's extended forward.
- 8,173
- 2,212
They were already drawn out in combat stance lol.Damage3245 said:
- 10,079
- 9,397
He was using his sword the entire fight, i see no reason for to sheath them and start using his hands or whatever.Damage3245 said:
- 31,608
- 28,109
They really weren't.Sigurd Snake in The Eye said:
- 10,079
- 9,397
I don't know what you saw, but they clearly where.
- 2,939
- 1,400
- Thread starter
- #354
@Damage3245
Here Ichigo is shown with both swords waiting for the Sternritters to attack and here , shows him with both of them close to his face.
@AguilaR101
I do not think so, since everything moves, even if they move 10 degrees.
Here Ichigo is shown with both swords waiting for the Sternritters to attack and here , shows him with both of them close to his face.
@AguilaR101
I do not think so, since everything moves, even if they move 10 degrees.
- 8,173
- 2,212
Sure they weren't bud, whatever you say.
- 31,608
- 28,109
I think I see where I got mixed up. This was Ichigo right before the arrows hit him, and his swords weren't in sight, so I assumed they were holstered on his back.
- 8,173
- 2,212
It does look like that but his larger sword doesn't have a holster, it was wrapped up on his back. Only the smaller one did.
- 1,461
- 764
Huh, well if calc members confirmed it that makes sense to me.
And yes, in that panel right as the arrows are about to land, Ichigo's arms are limp at his sides but he has unsheathed his swords and is holding them at rest.
I see no reason to combat the calc since it was already-accepted given the original values, and USklaverei merely updated it to be more accurate with calc members' input.
And yes, in that panel right as the arrows are about to land, Ichigo's arms are limp at his sides but he has unsheathed his swords and is holding them at rest.
I see no reason to combat the calc since it was already-accepted given the original values, and USklaverei merely updated it to be more accurate with calc members' input.
- 31,608
- 28,109
Well, well. This is a genuine upgrade thread now. Ichigo's feat was already the most impressive speed feat in the verse, but now it is Relativistic.
- 1,461
- 764
The interesting thing, to me, is that it was already accepted but one simple error in the math was wrong so now it is an absurdly higher value than originally stated due to a legitimate mistake.
Would it be wrong for persons to go against the calc now that it has been turned to an upgrade with support from calc members, simply because it's a drastic upgrade? I've not experienced this, so am curious for input
Would it be wrong for persons to go against the calc now that it has been turned to an upgrade with support from calc members, simply because it's a drastic upgrade? I've not experienced this, so am curious for input
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
