- 5,668
- 4,897
- Thread starter
- #201
That bullet argument isnt comparable
as for dangai, citation?
as for dangai, citation?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
in fiction it happens@Dangai, holy shit that’s an actual fact?
Do you mean in regards to the bullet after its fired?@Cyber, no I’m pretty sure it’s comparable.
You can practically see anything if you have the right angle. If you were in a space station you would be able to see a light speed movement around the earth@Dangai, holy shit that’s an actual fact?
this. I don't even know why normal people being able to see light is at all relevantPeople lost me on this seeing light speed stuff. They don’t need to be seeing the light speed object in question, just the effects of its travel.
ok soAnd people going FTL would absolutely destroy the surroundings and nuke the entire Seireitei as a result. There being greater effects irl doesn’t and has never discredited a feat, it’s what gets called AOE fallacy. Planetary characters swinging full force and barely toppling a building without the lovely staff explanation of Ki control is a thing in fiction but we still accept them as planetary or what have you.
There is no expansion. The beam has never expanded and it’s on you to prove that it just so happened to expand in this instance when there is a valid point in explanation for the change in shape. Expansion also doesn’t explain why the shape of the star is different, only that it is bigger than it was originally.
Edit: Dunno why it says staff in the first paragraph. Staff got nothing to do with what I was saying lmao
I'm getting more confused by people wanting it the other way around.@Damage, you’re still confusing me man. For example, if like 5 people threw baseballs at me at different times I would focus on the last one throwing it and deflecting that and consider that my speed instead of how fast I hit the other 4 away? I’m lost.
What are you arguing exactly? Because it seems like you are saying the beam isn’t star shaped from the very beginning when it clearly is. Look at the forehead of his mask where it comes from. That is where the beam comes from and is emitted from all of the star. The beam has always been star shaped.ok so
We never get a shot of the end point of the beam before it hits something. All we know is that upon firing, the beam lacks a star shape initially, at least from that angle
Same issue here
Its already in star esqe shape in the next panel
so it either:
expands upon contact
or expanded on the blade
It doesnt reflect, as ive pointed out before. I remains flat and expands out.
Sound breaks the light barrier – Physics WorldCan't Sound move faster than light? I saw a video by Andrew Sosa and there was that
Lets go with that, sure. It still doesnt reflect so we still have the same issueWhat are you arguing exactly? Because it seems like you are saying the beam isn’t star shaped from the very beginning when it clearly is. Look at the forehead of his mask where it comes from. That is where the beam comes from and is emitted from all of the star. The beam has always been star shaped.
mach cone was specifically to show what i would consider a real nitpick. Im just weirded out you brought bullets in a discussion regarding light speed@Cyber, I feel like you’re trying to be as realistic and scientific as possible, and there’s no one in the world who can react to a bullet getting shot at them from a close distance, therefore no manga can accept a character moving faster than normal speed. Correct if I’m wrong though, that’s just what I personally feel like you’re trying to argue along with your other points
about the Mach cones from ichigo, that’s just Kubo telling us that ichigo is traveling fast. He made a Mach cone at the beginning of his journey and I’m pretty sure you can’t break the speed of sound again and make another cone if you’re already traveling faster than that. Which is another reason why I think you’re trying to be way to realistic about this
uhhh that is not a good thing. That is what I am arguingThe klang sound is obviously from the light hitting renjis sword
Is this sarcasm or? Because we already proved it’s not a klang.The klang sound is obviously from the light hitting renjis sword
refer to my post and citations hereNo. You are asserting it doesn’t reflect as fact. What we see is that the beam hits the sword and at the point of contact the shape of the beam changes. Now we have to ask ourselves “why?”.
Well what do we know about the beam? Mask calls it a laser, it is star shaped, it causes burns and vaporisation.
What do we know about the sword? The sword doesn’t have a flat surface and said surface is reflective.
Conclusion, the beam changes shape at the point of contact because said sword has properties that would change the shape of said beam. What properties are those? Not flat and reflective.