• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Bleach- PTS Speed Downgrade

King, what are you trying to prove with this?
The reason why staff said that "it being a light ray" isn't a qualification is because that's what's being tested.
The first sentence of the laser dodging page is saying that "if it's stated to be light, we need to check these justifications". Why would "it's light" be a justification?

The ray is not stated to be made out of light. There's a difference to be called light and being stated to be made out of light.
 
Bleach is not naruto nor is mask darui

And darui attacks us specifically explained
I'm giving an example on the rule.
You know Yamamoto's fire right?
Is it made out of fire? No, it's made out of Reishi. Are we gonna argue it's actual fire when it's not made out of fire?
0508-002.png
 
Calling something light fits that requirement you know...this shouldn’t be new if you’ve looked at light speed ability thread.
It shouldn't be new but apparently it is now.
Why would it be a requirement if that's what's being tested?

If you go to see if you have real diamonds, is calling it "diamonds" a justification for it being real?
 
KingTempest everything in Soul Society is made of Reishi. Including the Sun. What are you going on about? Everyone knows it’s not actual fire but it might as well be. Same with Toshiro and his ice.
 
prove it is something else, it is called light and we have no reason to assume otherwise
 
I'm giving an example on the rule.
You know Yamamoto's fire right?
Is it made out of fire? No, it's made out of Reishi. Are we gonna argue it's actual fire when it's not made out of fire?
U gonna forget now that everything and everyone (souls) and their stuff is made out of reishi?
 
They don't need to be. You should read the actual page instead. It is clearly mentioned:

This is not a full list of qualities that can qualify/disqualify a feat as a "true laser/light beam"

And Mask's beam is not stated or implied to be made of spiritual matter, making it the same as natural light. Quincies are shown to absorb reishi when they use it for their atks yet Mask's isnt.
 
Then
Why would it be a requirement if that's what's being tested?

If you go to see if you have real diamonds, is calling it "diamonds" a justification for it being real?
Can u prove the contrary?

If I call something a diamond and u say no can u prove it?

If I call something a light atatck and is shown like light is on u to prove it's not light
 
Wouldn't this be solved quickly by posting an inverse explanation as to the composition of reishi
 
KingTempest everything in Soul Society is made of Reishi. Including the Sun. What are you going on about?
Not one person on this page understood the point.

The point is that it being "called" light is not enough, it needs to be stated to be created from, forged out of, or made out of light.
prove it is something else, it is called light and we have no reason to assume otherwise
That's literally your job.
Then
Can u prove the contrary?

If I call something a diamond and u say no can u prove it?

If I call something a light atatck and is shown like light is on u to prove it's not light
I'm not forced to prove contrary, this is your thread and your laser.
You need to prove it's not, which is why we have justifications.
 
Not one person on this page understood the point.

The point is that it being "called" light is not enough, it needs to be stated to be created from, forged out of, or made out of light.

That's literally your job.

I'm not forced to prove contrary, this is your thread and your laser.
You need to prove it's not, which is why we have justifications.
Occam's razor, If something is called light and it meet requirements u have to prove otherwise that it is not light
 
If something is called light and it meet requirements u have to prove otherwise that it is not light
It meets one requirement, reflecting.
It's not stated to be made out of light, so it doesn't meet many requirements.
Please stop. A beam of light is made of light dude. The purpose of the page is to give light in fiction the speed of light.
So why is that a requirement on the laser page? Is it there for decoration?
 
No, I'm asking to just post an explanation as to what makes up that since the topic right now has basically moved on to whether or not the light is even real I guess
Reishi is the same as egular matter but for spirits

The sun works the same, light, water, fire etc.

Photons, spiritons is basically the same but for ghost
 
Not one person on this page understood the point.

The point is that it being "called" light is not enough, it needs to be stated to be created from, forged out of, or made out of light.
Yes the official translation and the others support it being called a beam OF light meaning a beam made out of light.
 
No, I'm asking to just post an explanation as to what makes up that since the topic right now has basically moved on to whether or not the light is even real I guess
Read post 814. Unless u believe natural light is made of matter cuz it is emitted by a construct made of one....then eeesh
 
Because again they all behave the same as the real world lol. A beam of light is made of light.
Light's made out of photons.
If you're in chemistry and they say "what's water made out of", are you gonna say "water"?

Yall are arguing "it should be" or "it must be", it's obviously not if it's a requirement.
 
That’s literally stupid. If something is called a ball of ice would you argue it isn’t really a ball of ice based off nothing? You’re straw grasping here.
 
Back
Top