Prove it's an anti feat. The only thing funny here is your lack of self awareness buddy.
How about you first prove that it's not an anti-feat? Because Acausality is more than just resistance, it's essentially nearly an immunity.
Characters with acausality exist differently from time or fate, rendering conventional time and fate manipulation ineffective on them as they aren't tied to a time and fate that conventional time and fate manipulation can affect.
Hence, when someone can affect Acausality type 4 with Causality, it is usually written as "Negation Acausality type 4" and not as layered causality manipulation, as no layered causality is affecting one that exists beyond or differently from the causality they can manipulate.
No characters to my knowledge have Type 1 for that reason. Type 1 is being uneffected by changes in time, being born in a place that has a different system of time =/= Type 1 as they can still be effected by changes in time.
It can be classified as Type 1 as it essentially function as one.
Demons from Devil May Cry and Plants from Trigun do not exist out of time. They simply have it for being born in places with a different flow of time.
So, should all Isekai characters have Type 4 Acausality for being born in a dimension where time differs from their current dimensions? It's either you are not telling the whole story, or you didn't fully understand the reasoning behind their Type 4 Acausality.
The fact that he existed before any concepts in the universe? Life, death and many things weren't around till The Soul King made them into concepts. He existed during a time where everything was different.
This doesn't really prove that it also means he existed before the concept of causality or time existed. Unless you have evidence for it, this is just another form of assumption on your part.
I hate your half of your argument, tbh, because you're essentially just spamming the idea that "just because it doesn't mention causality doesn't mean there is no causality." Get proof, please.
Again it's not wank. You labeling things as wank = You having no further argument.
Buddy pal nobody ever mentioned BC. Literally what the **** are you even talking about at this point?
I quite literally never insulted you, shit I hardly interact with you because you act like an immature 12 year old that talks shit on fortnite all day.
Ah yes aren't you also one of the people who uses my name for not liking my argument? I can literally prove it.
Not reaching at all whenever you can't even explain how it's "reaching."
Rules but you'll know soon enough trust me.
Not seeing how replies to an argument is "weird."
Because you didn't really add anything and made me appear as a bad guy, when all I did was mention the fact that you people are the same ones who keep talking about further explanation.