- 6,203
- 6,183
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@DemonGodMitchAubin ; Could you choose the method? The anime version looks very different from the manga version.
Disagree, you can very much see the clouds being pulled in anytime he uses the spellAfter looking over the feat more closely, it doesn't really look like William is pulling the clouds from the horizon, honestly CAPE should be used for that calc
Mass is 3.7812209e+12 Kg
Since we see no lightning, but the clouds are still very dark, an instability of 2500 Joules/Kg should be fine
This makes our final value of...
(3.7812209e+12 Kg)*(2500 Joules/Kg) = 2.3 Megatons (Small City level)
I agree with dragongamerNot really. Take his first use of it for instance, none of the clouds there just show up, they are all seen moving to the center
so is High 6-B shafted completely 0.0DragonGamer also remade the Clover Kingdom Destruction Calc in a better way
So the High 6-B Calc is now 6-B
I've used another shot (back when Patry was monologuing to Yami and there's a shot of the mountain) and I got similar results. It's pretty consistent all things considered.I disagree with using the mountain. Mountain size is extremely inconsistent
I prefer to use the horizon at chapter ~50-60 (the beach chapter)
With this calc, the god tiers are about Country level+, I'll edit the OP with the scaling for that shortly.so is High 6-B shafted completely 0.0
KkWith this calc, the god tiers are about Country level+, I'll edit the OP with the scaling for that shortly.
The castle is never like that. It's always small compared to the mountain since it rests atop the mountain.In many scenes the castle is almost the same size as than the mountain, and in others the castle is a ant. this is the point
I don't get it. The examples you've shown all literally prove what I'm saying, as I've already said that it's pretty small in comparison. You see the mountain go pretty far down, which is consistent with what I've said. Nothing you said here disproves that.Here the castle is almost the height of the mountain
Here again
Again
And again
And again...
And again.......
There is also the opposite, where the castle is an atom in comparison
The chapter of the same scene that you use to calculate the height of the mountain exists in countless proportions
How is this a consistent size? There is no scene that is consistent with each other. It just doesn't work. Black Clover art is never consistent with sizes
It's the entire Noble Realm, not just a regular mountain. This argument from incredulity doesn't even work here.A mountain with a diameter of 300km and 100km in height, the dude
I chose the one I used because it's a full shot of the entire Noble Realm, as that's the entire focus of the panel in question. Other shots have another focus which is why the size gets altered some (such as some focusing on the peasants looking toward the castle, hence why both would need to be drawn) and then two others are literally shots from within the royal capital, where obviously the castle would look big given that the castle is within the capital.I really don’t see a huge issue with the mountain size TBH, fiction kinda always has ridiculous sizes for stuff
But maybe there is a better shot of the full mountain we can use?
There's no answer, you literally just said "That doesn't belie what I said"I don't get it. The examples you've shown all literally prove what I'm saying, as I've already said that it's pretty small in comparison. You see the mountain go pretty far down, which is consistent with what I've said. Nothing you said here disproves that.
And? I'm not saying the mountain is small, I'm saying it's inconsistent.Every scene you've shown still shows that the mountain is giant
and don't forget it
"The tip of the mountain changes." Okay? That's irrelevant to what's being argued. You didn't even address my reasoning for why I went with what I did. Yes, there is an argument, I made an argument and you can't just dismiss it just because. I've explained everything.Dude, even the tip of the mountain is changed every scene, the demon scene for example shows a full resolution of the mountain, contradicting several scenes (Actually, every mountain scene contradicts each other). There is no argument.
All it took was some very quick pixel scaling for me to see that the mountain's about the same height as in the shot I used. That scan proves nothing in your favor.and don't forget it
Your argument is "This is a scene with the complete mountain, so I'm going to use it". But like... There are other scenes with a full proportion, like here and here, why don't you use these two? Also, the Castle is inconsistent as well, in some scenes it is not many times bigger than a house."The tip of the mountain changes." Okay? That's irrelevant to what's being argued. You didn't even address my reasoning for why I went with what I did. Yes, there is an argument, I made an argument and you can't just dismiss it just because. I've explained everything.
Idk howAll it took was some very quick pixel scaling for me to see that the mountain's about the same height as in the shot I used. That scan proves nothing in your favor.
Do not use the castle and the mountain for pixelscale, because sizes are inconsistentReading this i cant see the problem,
Life_of_king what would your proposal be then?
You don’t see the full mountain in the ones you’ve shown. Most, yeah, but not all of it. As for the castle, you’ll get very similar results if you pixel scale the tower to the castle in that model.Your argument is "This is a scene with the complete mountain, so I'm going to use it". But like... There are other scenes with a full proportion, like here and here, why don't you use these two? Also, the Castle is inconsistent as well, in some scenes it is not many times bigger than a house.
you can just do this. But anyway, this Scan is completeYou don’t see the full mountain in the ones you’ve shown. Most, yeah, but not all of it.
Houses with 500 metersyou’ll get very similar results if you pixel scale the tower to the castle in that model.
Wtf?Well, first off, it's an unofficial scan so that makes the result wack.
Wtf?2Second, it's basically the same as the scan I used.
I don't know how. Because with this scan I got a diameter of 155055 meters with the castle diameter you used, and with this one I got 16467 meters. The mountain always changes with each panel. In these scenes it is shown that the tip of the mountain is "plan" (Like a Conical Frustum), but in these others the mountain is a perfect triangle. You will still just continue with the reasoning "It's scene show the whole mountain, so I'll use it".Third, even using that scan, the result wasn't very different from what I got.
Yes, I continue with a reasoning that makes sense. Just making it sound nonsensical the way you're doing now doesn't actually make it nonsensical.You will still just continue with the reasoning "It's scene show the whole mountain, so I'll use it".