- 12,159
- 11,797
Unfortunately, that doesn't fall under genocide according to Oxford; only mass murder.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unfortunately, that doesn't fall under genocide according to Oxford; only mass murder.
He literally did it because they were Quincy, since the Quincy were the ones with his power in them.Unfortunately, that doesn't fall under genocide according to Oxford; only mass murder.
Yhwach didn't kill the Quincy just because, and he didn't do it with the goal of exterminating them; he did it to regain his power. Also, he didn't kill them because they are Quincy, but because it was the way to regain his power. So it fails to meet the criteria of the definition.
The action is equally evil, but the intent is not as malicious as killing them out of hatred or something similar.It was one of my points, not my whole argument. but yeah Yhwach's self-righteousness makes him less evil than the Soul Society. Think of it like a soldier believing they are serving a righteous cause and committing atrocities, even if the cause is not truly righteous, being considered less evil than a soldier who knows they're doing something wrong but keeps doing it anyway. Morality and evilness can be measured in various ways, two of which are the action itself and the intent/reason behind it. Yhwach genuinely believed that his goal was the best for humanity. He initially pursued this goal for both self-preservation and empathy/compassion for the living, which he acquired through absorbing the memories of countless people who feared death.
"The deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular race or nation."Unfortunately, that doesn't fall under genocide according to Oxford; only mass murder.
This is one of the most looking ass statements I’ve ever seenUnfortunately, that doesn't fall under genocide according to Oxford; only mass murder.
The auschwalen was an ethnic cleansing in which Quincy who weren't pure enough were systematically murdered. If that isn't a genocide then who tf knows dude.
But it was not a hate crime, and he didn't kill them because he wanted to exterminate a group of people; he did it to regain his power.He literally did it because they were Quincy, since the Quincy were the ones with his power in them.
The auschwalen was an ethnic cleansing in which Quincy who weren't pure enough were systematically murdered. If that isn't a genocide then who tf knows dude.
"The deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular race or nation."
the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group.
The intent was not to kill them just because they were 'impure' but because 'pure' Quincy are a rarity that could not be disposed of, so they were the alternative. (It was not a hate crime.)was an ethnic cleansing in which Quincy who weren't pure enough were systematically murdered.
But it was not a hate crime, and he didn't kill them because he wanted to exterminate a group of people; he did it to regain his power.
Yhwach ideals towards the Quincy was based on hitlers ideology that’s one of the reason for the Germanic theme the wandereich have. It pretty safe too bet that it was genocideBut it was not a hate crime, and he didn't kill them because he wanted to exterminate a group of people; he did it to regain his power.
The intent was not to kill them just because they were 'impure' but because 'pure' Quincy are a rarity that could not be disposed of, so they were the alternative. (It was not a hate crime.)
His motivation was not to destroy the Quincy; therefore, it's not genocide.
This is one of the most looking ass statements I’ve ever seen
The distinction matters in our judicial system and public perception, It also matters a lot depending on how someone measures evil; therefore, it's an important differentiation.
Dude do you not think racial purity is a motive that qualifies under hate crime?But it was not a hate crime, and he didn't kill them because he wanted to exterminate a group of people; he did it to regain his power.
The intent was not to kill them just because they were 'impure' but because 'pure' Quincy are a rarity that could not be disposed of, so they were the alternative. (It was not a hate crime.)
His motivation was not to destroy the Quincy; therefore, it's not genocide.
That's never confirmed. The manga implies they fell into eugenics due to the rarity of pure Quincy post-genocide. The only ideology you can attribute to Yhwach is the 'unnecessary Quincy' one, which is not based on eugenics but on usefulness for himself.Yhwach ideals towards the Quincy was based on hitlers ideology that’s one of the reason for the Germanic theme the wandereich have. It pretty safe too bet that it was genocide
YesDude do you not think racial purity is a motive that qualifies under hate crime?
No, the distinction is on intent, as I've said multiple times. He didn't want to destroy a very specific type of Quincy; he wanted to regain his power. Since the specific group of Quincy was less useful to him, due to the whole power dilution thing (which is showcased in Blut), it shows that it was not due to 'hate.' This is further emphasized when he used Auswählen on all of Quincy. It implies he never did it because of racial superiority but due to a utilitarian approach, which in this case would not be classified as a hate crime.Nobody cares about the idea of destroying a race entirely when talking about genocide. Yhwach is trying to destroy a very specific type of Quincy, which would still be a genocide when understood by everyone. You can commit genocide on a sect of a larger race for example without intending to destroy the entire larger race. You're just misunderstanding the definition.
He wanted to exterminate them to regain his power. This does not suddenly mean he didn't want to exterminate themBut it was not a hate crime, and he didn't kill them because he wanted to exterminate a group of people; he did it to regain his power.
That's absurd and I struggle to see how you can honestly say that.Yes
No, the distinction is on intent, as I've said multiple times. He didn't want to destroy a very specific type of Quincy; he wanted to regain his power. Since the specific group of Quincy was less useful to him, due to the whole power dilution thing (which is showcased in Blut), it shows that it was not due to 'hate.' This is further emphasized when he used Auswählen on all of Quincy. It implies he never did it because of racial superiority but due to a utilitarian approach, which in this case would not be classified as a hate crime.
And since his goal was not "destroying that nation or group" but gaining power through Quincy, which he deemed as less useful, and it has nothing to do with ethics, then it would not be genocide.
"Genocide is an internationally recognized crime where acts are committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group."He wanted to exterminate them to regain his power. This does not suddenly mean he didn't want to exterminate them
So he just took the power back and didn't know it would kill them? That's the only way he could do it. If he chose to do it despite knowing they would die, he intended to kill them."Genocide is an internationally recognized crime where acts are committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group."
There's a reason the nuclear attack on Japan is not considered genocide, and it's the same reason here. Killing the victims was not the main goal. The victims were killed as a 'byproduct' to achieve the goal. If the international community doesn't consider the nuclear attacks genocide, then it would also not consider Auswählen a genocide.
This isn't at all analagous. It's a technique that specifically targets a group of people for death rather than just a nuke with no racial motive. Yhwach intends to kill everyone he killed for specific reasonsThere's a reason the nuclear attack on Japan is not considered genocide, and it's the same reason here. Killing the victims was not the main goal. The victims were killed as a 'byproduct' to achieve the goal. If the international community doesn't consider the nuclear attacks genocide, then it would also not consider Auswählen a genocide.
Did the US not know that two cities where going to die? Knowledge of the act does not make it genocideSo he just took the power back and didn't know it would kill them? That's the only way he could do it. If he chose to do it despite knowing they would die, he intended to kill them.
Also, the difference between this and the nukes is that one is two cities out of a country, and the other is two planets out of two planets.
The nukes explicitly targeted the extinction of two cities of civilians of a specific ethnicity. Since it's not considered genocide, it emphasizes that the intent behind the targeting is what matters to the definition.This isn't at all analagous. It's a technique that specifically targets a group of people for death rather than just a nuke with no racial motive. Yhwach intends to kill everyone he killed for specific reasons
The international community would consider magic anime attack aimed to destroy a specific minority group for x reason genocide.
The reasons are the degree of usefulness to him. The whole idea isn't intricately tied to ethnicity. If this were a scenario like Dragon Ball where 'impure' Quincy were stronger (as with Uryu), he would not target them after knowing that because they would be more useful for him. It's also the same reason why he used Auswählen on all non-Schutzstaffel—usefulness to him. If anything, you could argue this from a "law of the jungle" mentality more than an ethnic prosecution.Yhwach intends to kill everyone he killed for specific reasons
False equivalence; Frieza didn't have to murder whole villages of Namekians to accomplish his goal. He did it with the explicit intent of killing them just because.I swear these mfs would say Frieza didn't legally commit genocide on the Namekians because he just wanted to be immortal.
Watch.I swear these mfs would say Frieza didn't legally commit genocide on the Namekians because he just wanted to be immortal.
Cities are not the same as racesDid the US not know that two cities where going to die? Knowledge of the act does not make it genocide
"Yeah, but he didn't do it because of their race, he just did it because they annoyed him."False equivalence; Frieza didn't have to murder whole villages of Namekians to accomplish his goal. He did it with the explicit intent of killing them just because.
Self defense.Zaraki's "past deeds of thrill killing" were when he was a literal child being hunted down by ghost cops.
You're not addressing my argument.The reasons are the degree of usefulness to him. The whole idea isn't intricately tied to ethnicity. If this were a scenario like Dragon Ball where 'impure' Quincy were stronger (as with Uryu), he would not target them after knowing that because they would be more useful for him. It's also the same reason why he used Auswählen on all non-Schutzstaffel—usefulness to him. If anything, you could argue this from a "law of the jungle" mentality more than an ethnic prosecution.
Did the US not know that two cities where going to die? Knowledge of the act does not make it genocide
This argument is incredibly dishonest. There's no honest comparison to be drawn here.The nukes explicitly targeted the extinction of two cities of civilians of a specific ethnicity. Since it's not considered genocide, it emphasizes that the intent behind the targeting is what matters to the definition.
The Holodomor wasn't a genocide because Stalin just wanted to enact the five year plan, not necessarily kill all Ukrainians.I swear these mfs would say Frieza didn't legally commit genocide on the Namekians because he just wanted to be immortal.
There's an argument I've heard from some people that the Holodomor was mostly a mismanagement of resources by some higher-ups, kind of a general ****-up on their part.The Holodomor wasn't a genocide because Stalin just wanted to enact the five year plan, not necessarily kill all Ukrainians.
Anos Grandeyhwach vs Anos
(Even without Venuzudonoa) Gaynos >yhwach vs Anos
Voldigordyhwach vs Anos
bro ant doesn't know about thishe even contributed generously to earthquake victims
Who is his pedo friendWhat more ironic is kubo is known for his goodwill, he even contributed generously to earthquake victims while other mangakas like oda are known to be friends with pedophiles
Toriko authorWho is his pedo friend
What did blud doToriko author
Child prostitution.What did blud do