• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Arthur Fleck's social influencing

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jackythejack

They/Them
20,008
1,717
The reasoning for his social influencing is like, not even accurate and ignores all context. He himself didn't start the movement on purpose, nor did he ever convince people about starting a movement. They interpreted him wrong and thought he had some kind of message. It's literally an accident that any of this happens and he openly stated he didn't want to start a movement in the movie.

And being on the Murray Talk Show. ...really? He only got on the Murray talk show because people found him pitiful and funny. Murray only invited him on the show to make fun of him more, and Arthur certainly didn't influence his way to be on the show. This is blatantly ignoring context for the movie. Please remove.
 
But his final kill of Murray was social influencing.

Though you could argue that the whole movie was implied to be a dream so Arthur should have no profile at all.
 
Though you could argue that the whole movie was implied to be a dream so Arthur should have no profile at all.

Considering we have a verse where the vbw relevant part explicitly did not happen and I've been told that we'd just tier that section as itself, I don't think this is going to happen. Also when was that even implied?
 
Agree with the removal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top