Anything wrong with the tiering system

[Artorimachi_Meteoraft]

Look this post is not about hating vs battle wiki.

I like this place but the idea of outerversal and stuff really drives me crazy occasionally.

I do feel like the tiering system is not always accurate.

Does anyone agree with me that there are a few problems with the tiering system.

Also the idea of feats for omnipotence is really kind of dumb for a tiering system

 

[Antvasima]

We do not use omnipotence, but we do rate characters from the degree of reality that they transcend.

 

[Antvasima]

Anyway, there are some potential problems with the system, but we will hopefully work them out in time.

 

[Artorimachi_Meteoraft]

It's good to be skeptical about the system right antvasima.

Is that bad or no

 

[Antvasima]

Well, I am open for improvements, but they must be very well considered.

 

[Setsuna_tenma]

well 2C is named low multiversal now.Multi universal was much better than low multiversal.Low multiversal would best fit 2B

 

[The_King_of_Prudence]

Low 2-C should be "High Universal+."

 

[Mand21]

Please, it's weird enough that a tier without a "Low" is called "Low" and you wanna give a name with "High" to a tier called "Low"?

 

[The_King_of_Prudence]

"Universe Level+" implies that it is the high end of 3-A.

 

[Mand21]

Yeah, it could be multi-universal. Not "high universal+"

 

[Antvasima]

This thread seems kind of pointless. Perhaps we should close it?

 

[Mand21]

Probably.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay.