In my opinion I believe we should remove what’s written on Animal Mans wall as it’s wrong
In what way is it wrong?
and the person who wrote it admitted to not even having read Animal Man.
Lol. You don't need to be familiar with source material to recognize an error in a logical conclusion. If someone who
has read the source material suggests something, they need to provide evidence. That evidence should demonstrate their point clearly. None of the reasons provided to upgrade Animal Man were coherent in that regard.
Bohm Theory is not just referenced throughout Animal Man, It’s explained to be how the in-universe cosmology literally
works multiple
times. Additionally we even see The Writer creating the in-universe cosmology from Comic Book Limbo while
using a book about Bohm Theory.
None of those scans demonstrate "how the in-universe cosmology works." The guy is waxing philosophical about drops of rain, comparing them to telepathic powers in comic books, coffee cup stains, and the implicate order.
There's no confusion that Bohm and his work has been mentioned in Animal Man, but the extent to which it literally applies to the world at hand isn't explained in any significant detail and it's mentioned alongside various other cosmological concepts which themselves have an unclear application to the cosmology. It's also incompatible with the rest of DC, which is why it's not being used for DC tiering.
The cosmology presented in Animal Man consist of basically The Red which is comprised of something called The World Tree. This World Tree consist of three kingdoms.
The first kingdom is the domain of quantum physics/spirit. The second is our reality/the universe.
Where is the Red equated to this World Tree? Also, this scan does not say the World Tree consists of those three worlds, it says it links them. These are very different things. Also, this is the hierarchy the scan gives:
First World: Hell -- the domain of quantum physics
Second World: Three Dimensional world that humans live in
Third World: Heaven
There is nothing connecting quantum physics to the spirit in that scan.
Your scan does not say this. It says "the explicate unfolding from the implicate." Also, what exactly do you mean by "unfolding from" in the context of a universe?
The symbol of David Bohm’s Implicate Order theory. The vision of vast and interconnected universe with each part containing the whole. Where the universe is a mirror reflecting itself.
Nothing about this statement suggests that is how the world works. He's just reminded of the theory when looking at raindrops.
There's nothing connecting the term "Imaginal realms" specifically the third kingdom. The Shaman experience references both the higher and lower kingdom.
The imaginal worlds are archetypal.
There is a lot of ambiguity in this statement. He says Keel would say you're in an Imaginal world of archetypes. An ant mystic might reference the world soul. He doesn't know if either of those interpretations are correct.
There is maybe an infinite amount of imaginal worlds within the third kingdom. Worlds within larger worlds within larger worlds.
The scan does not say this. In fact, it doesnt reference the third kingdom at all. Someone in the 2nd Kingdom opened the door to the place outside space and time (which is described as separate from all three kingdoms) and that allowed him to enter the mind of men. He realized that the world he was a part of was within a larger world,
maybe infinite worlds. He doesn't know. It's not a description of the Third Kingdom.
Where is it stated that this is the World Soul?
These worlds beyond the third kingdom must be even greater in size than the World Soul for them to be able to contain it.
This depends on the notion that the world soul encompasses the three kingdoms, but that's never stated in any of these scans.
is the manifestation of the Implicate Order known as The Clear Light. Taking things to even higher level than The World Soul, The Clear Light is a state of pure mind where even one’s very sense of self and identity vanishes.
Where is this described as the "background to reality" and a "manifestation of the implicate order?" It's not in the scan.
How did you determine these two were the same thing? These are completely different parts of the comic. If the only part that connects them is being called a "light" then that's not really proof.
It also doesn't say it "separates the implicate order."
Transcending all of what I’ve mentioned so far is the Implicate Order/Comic Book Limbo.
What evidence is there to equate the Implicate Order to Limbo?