Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mind Moving Infinite zamasu to the type 9 stop for large size because of recents crt's he became type 9 large size but on the page for Large size he is still represented as type 8 so can someone fix that?
Why is he considered to be type 9 (multiversal size) instead of type 8 (universal size)?
Because his influence extends to multiple timelines, which is multiversal range 2-C.
@Elizhaa @Dragonmasterxyz @Starter_PackOnly slightly, and Large Size Type 8 includes beings that are somewhat larger than a single universal continuum, but are of less than multiversal size.
Thanks!Okay. I will handle it.
This seems fine to do.@Elizhaa @Dragonmasterxyz @Starter_Pack
What do you think about this?
(AKM sama seems to be missing at the moment.)
Large size type 9 is any character that is bigger than a universal space time continuum, which zamasu is.@Elizhaa @Dragonmasterxyz @Starter_Pack
What do you think about this?
(AKM sama seems to be missing at the moment.)
The type 8 section specifies finite universes when talking about "Characters the size of or larger than a universe", if you see the type 9 section it says, "Characters larger than a universal space-time continuum". This means that type 8 is for finite universal sized characters up to space time continuums, and type 9 is for characters larger than space time continuums and higher. Zamasu fits in the type 9 section.No, from what I recall from reading the Large Size page, type 8 includes being (in this case slightly) larger than universe, whereas type 9 means that you are as big as a multiverse of some size. Zamasu fits much better as the former than the latter.
This is what the text says: "Characters the size of or larger than a universe".
However, we might have to better clarify that a type 9 characters needs to be of some degree of multiversal size, to avoid misunderstandings in the future.
lmao. okay bro.1.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001x
That also happens to me, and it's becoming an issue to recall pastly done standards right now.Idk if this is the appropriate place to post this, but is anyone else unable to search for content before today? My search range seems to be limited to today's date.
Thank you.Fixed.
That sounds reasonable.
Thank you. I will slightly adjust it then.I am fine with the Large Size changes.
Idk if this is the appropriate place to post this, but is anyone else unable to search for content before today? My search range seems to be limited to today's date.
I believe there was an issue where slightly dated threads were showing and not recent ones. Looks like they've created this issue when fixing the previous one.
I have informed our system manager about this.That also happens to me, and it's becoming an issue to recall pastly done standards right now.
This is not my area. Sorry.I would like to ask for a rules clarification for the sake of this thread.
For one-shotting characters, if Character A has displayed feats of one-shotting characters with pure AP, and Character B is at a lower AP than the character that Character A one-shot, Character A can one-shot Character B even if they don’t have a 7.5x AP difference. Is that correct, or no?
And does it matter if they both have AP values without numbers?
Thank you in advance.
Generally I would say so yes, unless there's other factors such as damage reduction, Type 2 immortality or incredible stamina.I would like to ask for a rules clarification for the sake of this thread.
For one-shotting characters, if Character A has displayed feats of one-shotting characters with pure AP, and Character B is at a lower AP than the character that Character A one-shot, Character A can one-shot Character B even if they don’t have a 7.5x AP difference. Is that correct, or no?
I'm not sure I understand. Like, Character A one-shots a baseline 8-C, and Character B is baseline 8-C? I would say yes, B should be one-shot as well.And does it matter if they both have AP values without numbers?
Would that mean that "In Universe One Shots" can disregard "Versus Thread One Shots (At Most A 7.5X Difference)"Generally I would say so yes, unless there's other factors such as damage reduction, Type 2 immortality or incredible stamina.
I'm not sure I understand. Like, Character A one-shots a baseline 8-C, and Character B is baseline 8-C? I would say yes, B should be one-shot as well.
No, that's not as straightforward so I wouldn't say that for sure, you could argue C has the AP advantage honestly.Would that mean that "In Universe One Shots" can disregard "Versus Thread One Shots (At Most A 7.5X Difference)"
Ex. Character A is able to One Shot Character B (100 Megatons) within their own Verse.
But if Character A is put against Character C (200 Megatons), who comes from another Verse, does "A" One Shot "C"?
I asked about it.
I have done so.can someone close this https://vsbattles.com/threads/ultimecia-vs-anos.126670/#post-4262735
Thank you Ant!Okay. I will do so.
So where should I post the request aside from directly on the staff meaaage wall?I replied, but you shouldn't use this request thread for getting input in content revisions discussions.