And i'm trying to explain that you are in the wrong but you don't understand
Watch what you say, it could get you banned.
Not really? "You big brain" is such a minor offense Bro.
You be correct yeah, the line of thinking is not valid.
You really not. All you arguments involve you Affirming a disjunct. You say that the site is wrong doing things a way, Person01 explain WHY we do things that way, but you don't explain what's wrong with the argument, and just say it is wrong, and say we should go the other way, when the way we do things already works fine.
I wouldn’t say it’s a minor offence. That phrase has negative connotations and I’m pretty sure the definition itself is opposite to what it conveys. It’s insulting someone’s intelligence is it not? But more of in a sarcastic tone. IIRC the user has said it more than once and needs to stop since he could be warned. Might not be ban worthy but it’s still highly disrespectful.
What do you mean "you just say it is wrong"
That is the same. They are saying that the king vegeta thing is not filler, and is canon. You are saying that it is filler, and it’s not canon. So you are saying they are wrong.
This is better, but you have to admit that he still haven't confirmed that King Vegeta's feat scene is CANON. We don't knows exactly what are Toriyama's ideas (except for few like Gregory's character)
You're talking about the Future Trunks who could already fight Future Gohan, who didn't easily outmatched him,? This same Future Gohan who pushed Android 17 to fight seriously?
After rereading the chapter, mmm, you're right.
He is literally treating Trunks like a baby in the image you embedded. Trunks, as an able-bodied Super Saiyan with both functioning arms, could hardly keep pace with Gohan, who only had one arm to fight with, without nearly exhausting himself. You can compare the difference in the number of sweat beads, if you want.
whatever that's supposed to mean
Trunks is attacking and Gohan is defending. That's all. Gohan himself is saying that Trunks is doing good
Mate, the only thing you need to understand is that these original episodes you call "filler" are Akira's ideas and they are all canon to the work, unless you bring some evidence proving that they are not or make a CRT to change that, your opinion is not worth much here without a CRT.
Again. Nobody said or proven that ALL the fillers are Toriyama's works. There are some inconsistencies in the additions, particularly regarding power levels, such as Kid Buu being considered the strongest of the Buus in the anime, even though it's clear that he isn't.
Once again... you have no evidence for your endless fallacies. Kid Buu has always been stronger, which is even confirmed by the manga and Daima.
Again, it's because you guys have no proofs that i don't have one. I'm only answering your takes.
The problem is you keep calling those scenes "filler" how are they filler in the first place especially when you admitted this↓↓
Idk what form of mental gymnastics bro will pull
You guys just don't understand
You don't understand explain why they are "fillers" in the first place while taking account for
"You yourself admitted Manga and Anime were different continuities long ago on this very thread" i never said that
You keep dodging the obvious question , the thing you keep calling fillers why are they fillers.
He keeps saying it's filler because it didn't appear in DBS anime again, so it must be filler.
so anything that isn't referenced in dbs is "filler" even though it happened? Help
Why do you keep implanting every fillers in DBS anime? DBS Anime IS canon. If you want to make a filler scene/flashback canon to DBS, then this must be PRESENT IN THE ANIME and that's not the case for King Vegeta's scene.
Bro what this is why I wanted you to define what filler was because you clearly don't know how filler works , since when does a sequel dictate what's "canon" and what's "filler" in it's prequel you’re saying super rewrites the whole of z which makes no sense , by your logic things that happened in harry Potter book 3 can be dismissed as "filler" because in book 7 everything wasn't referenced? That's not how continuity works
yeah i said myself later that i was wrong in this, but that's make no difference. That would've be worse, that's all.
fillers are non-original works. King Vegeta's scene is a FILLER. This is not in the manga and this is not Toriyama's idea until proven otherwise.
There is no need to waste his time now he's claiming the OG manga and anime are same continuity so just let him be
